Sosialisme (Indonesian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sosialisme" in Indonesian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Indonesian rank
1st place
1st place
6th place
2nd place
3rd place
6th place
803rd place
470th place
9,546th place
7,582nd place
40th place
36th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2nd place
4th place
5th place
7th place
2,106th place
4,025th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,008th place
2,797th place
614th place
254th place
3,341st place
4,261st place
low place
low place
6,917th place
2,381st place
low place
low place
18th place
44th place
low place
low place
293rd place
771st place
low place
low place
8,379th place
9,942nd place
268th place
301st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
321st place
1,257th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7th place
35th place
8,545th place
7,857th place
12th place
49th place
low place
low place
28th place
70th place
5,363rd place
7,991st place
low place
low place
5,752nd place
5,144th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,648th place
1,594th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

acracia.org

aljazeera.com

america.aljazeera.com

alternet.org

archive.org

books.google.com

britannica.com

chomsky.info

  • Noam Chomsky (1986). The Soviet Union Versus Socialism. chomsky.info.
  • "The Soviet Union Versus Socialism". chomsky.info. Diakses tanggal 22 November 2015. Libertarian socialism, furthermore, does not limit its aims to democratic control by producers over production, but seeks to abolish all forms of domination and hierarchy in every aspect of social and personal life, an unending struggle, since progress in achieving a more just society will lead to new insight and understanding of forms of oppression that may be concealed in traditional practice and consciousness. 

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

commondreams.org

dictionaryofeconomics.com

  • Nove, Alec. "Socialism". New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition (2008). A society may be defined as socialist if the major part of the means of production of goods and services is in some sense socially owned and operated, by state, socialised or cooperative enterprises. The practical issues of socialism comprise the relationships between management and workforce within the enterprise, the interrelationships between production units (plan versus markets), and, if the state owns and operates any part of the economy, who controls it and how. 

doi.org

feministezine.com

fordham.edu

free.fr

joseph.dejacque.free.fr

google.de

books.google.de

greenleft.org.uk

harvard.edu

hup.harvard.edu

  • Mancur Olson, Jr., 1965, 2nd ed., 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Description, Table of Contents, and preview.

hetsa.org.au

iaf-ifa.org

infoshop.org

jrank.org

science.jrank.org

luc.edu

orion.it.luc.edu

  • Schweickart, David (2006). "Democratic Socialism". Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 17 June 2012.  "Social democrats supported and tried to strengthen the basic institutions of the welfare state—pensions for all, public health care, public education, unemployment insurance. They supported and tried to strengthen the labour movement. The latter, as socialists, argued that capitalism could never be sufficiently humanised, and that trying to suppress the economic contradictions in one area would only see them emerge in a different guise elsewhere. (E.g., if you push unemployment too low, you'll get inflation; if job security is too strong, labour discipline breaks down; etc.)"

marx.org

  • Rosa Luxemburg as part of a longer section on Blanquism in her "Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy" (later published as "Leninism or Marxism?"), writes: "For Lenin, the difference between the Social democracy and Blanquism is reduced to the observation that in place of a handful of conspirators we have a class-conscious proletariat. He forgets that this difference implies a complete revision of our ideas on organisation and, therefore, an entirely different conception of centralism and the relations existing between the party and the struggle itself. Blanquism did not count on the direct action of the working class. It, therefore, did not need to organise the people for the revolution. The people were expected to play their part only at the moment of revolution. Preparation for the revolution concerned only the little group of revolutionists armed for the coup. Indeed, to assure the success of the revolutionary conspiracy, it was considered wiser to keep the mass at some distance from the conspirators.Rosa Luxemburg, Leninism or Marxism?, Marx.org, last retrieved 25 April 2007

marxists.org

mutualist.org

natustar.com

newyouth.com

nytimes.com

ourfuture.org

pageabode.com

anarchism.pageabode.com

panarchy.org

pitzer.edu

dwardmac.pitzer.edu

raforum.info

spaz.org

  • French individualist anarchist Émile Armand shows clearly opposition to capitalism and centralised economies when he said that the individualist anarchist "inwardly he remains refractory—fatally refractory—morally, intellectually, economically (The capitalist economy and the directed economy, the speculators and the fabricators of single are equally repugnant to him.)""Anarchist Individualism as a Life and Activity" by Emile Armand

theanarchistlibrary.org

  • "In a society developed on these lines, the voluntary associations which already now begin to cover all the fields of human activity would take a still greater extension so as to substitute themselves for the state in all its functions." Peter Kropotkin. "Anarchism" from the Encyclopædia Britannica
  • "That is why Anarchy, when it works to destroy authority in all its aspects, when it demands the abrogation of laws and the abolition of the mechanism that serves to impose them, when it refuses all hierarchical organisation and preaches free agreement—at the same time strives to maintain and enlarge the precious kernel of social customs without which no human or animal society can exist." Peter Kropotkin. Anarchism: its philosophy and ideal
  • "anarchists are opposed to irrational (e.g., illegitimate) authority, in other words, hierarchy—hierarchy being the institutionalisation of authority within a society." "B.1 Why are anarchists against authority and hierarchy?" Diarsipkan 2012-06-15 di Wayback Machine. in An Anarchist FAQ
  • Individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker defined anarchism as opposition to authority as follows "They found that they must turn either to the right or to the left,—follow either the path of Authority or the path of Liberty. Marx went one way; Warren and Proudhon the other. Thus were born State Socialism and Anarchism ... Authority, takes many shapes, but, broadly speaking, her enemies divide themselves into three classes: first, those who abhor her both as a means and as an end of progress, opposing her openly, avowedly, sincerely, consistently, universally; second, those who profess to believe in her as a means of progress, but who accept her only so far as they think she will subserve their own selfish interests, denying her and her blessings to the rest of the world; third, those who distrust her as a means of progress, believing in her only as an end to be obtained by first trampling upon, violating, and outraging her. These three phases of opposition to Liberty are met in almost every sphere of thought and human activity. Good representatives of the first are seen in the Catholic Church and the Russian autocracy; of the second, in the Protestant Church and the Manchester school of politics and political economy; of the third, in the atheism of Gambetta and the socialism of Karl Marx." Benjamin Tucker. Individual Liberty.
  • "150 years of Libertarian". theanarchistlibrary.org. 
  • Individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker defined anarchism as opposition to authority as follows "They found that they must turn either to the right or to the left,—follow either the path of Authority or the path of Liberty. Marx went one way; Warren and Proudhon the other. Thus were born State Socialism and Anarchism...Authority, takes many shapes, but, broadly speaking, her enemies divide themselves into three classes: first, those who abhor her both as a means and as an end of progress, opposing her openly, avowedly, sincerely, consistently, universally; second, those who profess to believe in her as a means of progress, but who accept her only so far as they think she will subserve their own selfish interests, denying her and her blessings to the rest of the world; third, those who distrust her as a means of progress, believing in her only as an end to be obtained by first trampling upon, violating, and outraging her. These three phases of opposition to Liberty are met in almost every sphere of thought and human activity. Good representatives of the first are seen in the Catholic Church and the Russian autocracy; of the second, in the Protestant Church and the Manchester school of politics and political economy; of the third, in the atheism of Gambetta and the socialism of Karl Marx." Benjamin Tucker. Individual Liberty.
  • Anarchist Peter Sabatini reports that in the United States "of early to mid-19th century, there appeared an array of communal and "utopian" counterculture groups (including the so-called free love movement). William Godwin's anarchism exerted an ideological influence on some of this, but more so the socialism of Robert Owen and Charles Fourier. After success of his British venture, Owen himself established a cooperative community within the United States at New Harmony, Indiana during 1825. One member of this commune was Josiah Warren (1798–1874), considered to be the first individualist anarchist"Peter Sabatini. "Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy"

thefreedictionary.com

  • "2. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) any of various social or political theories or movements in which the common welfare is to be achieved through the establishment of a socialist economic system" "Socialism" at The Free dictionary

theglobeandmail.com

  • Malatesta, Errico. "Towards Anarchism". MAN!. OCLC 3930443. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 7 November 2012.  Agrell, Siri (14 May 2007). "Working for The Man". The Globe and Mail. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 16 May 2007. Diakses tanggal 14 April 2008.  "Anarchism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service. 2006. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 14 December 2006. Diakses tanggal 29 August 2006.  "Anarchism". The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: 14. 2005. Anarchism is the view that a society without the state, or government, is both possible and desirable.  The following sources cite anarchism as a political philosophy: Mclaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate. hlm. 59. ISBN 978-0-7546-6196-2.  Johnston, R. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. hlm. 24. ISBN 978-0-631-20561-6. 

theguardian.com

truth-out.org

uic.edu

umass.edu

people.umass.edu

  • Kotz, David M. "Socialism and Capitalism: Are They Qualitatively Different Socioeconomic Systems?" (PDF). University of Massachusetts. Diakses tanggal 19 February 2011.  "This understanding of socialism was held not just by revolutionary Marxist socialists but also by evolutionary socialists, Christian socialists, and even anarchists. At that time, there was also wide agreement about the basic institutions of the future socialist system: public ownership instead of private ownership of the means of production, economic planning instead of market forces, production for use instead of for profit."

washblade.com

web.archive.org

williamapercy.com

wisdomsupreme.com

worldcat.org

  • Malatesta, Errico. "Towards Anarchism". MAN!. OCLC 3930443. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 7 November 2012.  Agrell, Siri (14 May 2007). "Working for The Man". The Globe and Mail. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 16 May 2007. Diakses tanggal 14 April 2008.  "Anarchism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service. 2006. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 14 December 2006. Diakses tanggal 29 August 2006.  "Anarchism". The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: 14. 2005. Anarchism is the view that a society without the state, or government, is both possible and desirable.  The following sources cite anarchism as a political philosophy: Mclaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate. hlm. 59. ISBN 978-0-7546-6196-2.  Johnston, R. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. hlm. 24. ISBN 978-0-631-20561-6. 
  • Journal of Homosexuality, 1995, Volume 29, Issue 2/3. ISSN 0091-8369 – Simultaneously published as: Gay men and the sexual history of the political left, Gert Hekma et al. Eds. Harrington Park Press 1995, ISBN 1-56023-067-3. p. 14

zpub.com