Diritti riproduttivi (Italian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Diritti riproduttivi" in Italian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Italian rank
1st place
1st place
2nd place
7th place
4th place
9th place
799th place
22nd place
26th place
118th place
3rd place
14th place
24th place
48th place
97th place
186th place
6th place
8th place
9,860th place
9,809th place
low place
low place
8th place
23rd place
4,098th place
low place
772nd place
650th place
low place
low place
518th place
1,169th place
36th place
90th place
low place
low place
703rd place
1,724th place
2,275th place
low place
218th place
774th place
low place
low place

archive.org

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

cdc.gov

coe.int

rm.coe.int

doi.org

dx.doi.org

fhi.org

healthcare.gov

independent.co.uk

iwhc.org

  • Amnesty International, Defenders of Sexual and Reproductive Rights (archiviato dall'url originale il 2 ottobre 2013).; International Women’s Health Coalition and the United Nations., Campaign for an Inter-American Convention on Sexual and Reproductive Rights., Women's Health Collection, Abortion as a human right: possible strategies in unexplored territory. (Sexual Rights and Reproductive Rights),. (2003); and Shanthi Dairiam, Applying the CEDAW Convention for the recognition of women's health rights., Arrows For Change, (2002). In this regard, the Center for Reproductive Rights has noted that:

    Our goal is to ensure that governments worldwide guarantee women's reproductive rights out of an understanding that they are bound to do so. The two principal prerequisites for achieving this goal are: (1) the strengthening of international legal norms protecting reproductive rights; and (2) consistent and effective action on the part of civil society and the international community to enforce these norms. Each of these conditions, in turn, depends upon profound social change at the local, national and international (including regional) levels. (...) Ultimately, we must persuade governments to accept reproductive rights as binding norms. Again, our approach can move forward on several fronts, with interventions both at the national and international levels. Governments' recognition of reproductive rights norms may be indicated by their support for progressive language in international conference documents or by their adoption and implementation of appropriate national-level legislative and policy instruments. In order to counter opposition to an expansion of recognized reproductive rights norms, we have questioned the credibility of such reactionary yet influential international actors as the United States and the Holy See. Our activities to garner support for international protections of reproductive rights include: Lobbying government delegations at UN conferences and producing supporting analyses/materials; fostering alliances with members of civil society who may become influential on their national delegations to the UN; and preparing briefing papers and factsheets exposing the broad anti-woman agenda of our opposition.

    Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change (archiviato dall'url originale il 26 gennaio 2006)., US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (Dec. 8, 2003)

jstor.org

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

oadoi.org

oas.org

rhrealitycheck.org

ssrn.com

  • Lisa Lucile Owens, Coerced Parenthood as Family Policy: Feminism, the Moral Agency of Women, and Men's 'Right to Choose', in Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 5, 2013, pp. 1–33, SSRN 2439294.

thefreelibrary.com

  • Amnesty International, Defenders of Sexual and Reproductive Rights (archiviato dall'url originale il 2 ottobre 2013).; International Women’s Health Coalition and the United Nations., Campaign for an Inter-American Convention on Sexual and Reproductive Rights., Women's Health Collection, Abortion as a human right: possible strategies in unexplored territory. (Sexual Rights and Reproductive Rights),. (2003); and Shanthi Dairiam, Applying the CEDAW Convention for the recognition of women's health rights., Arrows For Change, (2002). In this regard, the Center for Reproductive Rights has noted that:

    Our goal is to ensure that governments worldwide guarantee women's reproductive rights out of an understanding that they are bound to do so. The two principal prerequisites for achieving this goal are: (1) the strengthening of international legal norms protecting reproductive rights; and (2) consistent and effective action on the part of civil society and the international community to enforce these norms. Each of these conditions, in turn, depends upon profound social change at the local, national and international (including regional) levels. (...) Ultimately, we must persuade governments to accept reproductive rights as binding norms. Again, our approach can move forward on several fronts, with interventions both at the national and international levels. Governments' recognition of reproductive rights norms may be indicated by their support for progressive language in international conference documents or by their adoption and implementation of appropriate national-level legislative and policy instruments. In order to counter opposition to an expansion of recognized reproductive rights norms, we have questioned the credibility of such reactionary yet influential international actors as the United States and the Holy See. Our activities to garner support for international protections of reproductive rights include: Lobbying government delegations at UN conferences and producing supporting analyses/materials; fostering alliances with members of civil society who may become influential on their national delegations to the UN; and preparing briefing papers and factsheets exposing the broad anti-woman agenda of our opposition.

    Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change (archiviato dall'url originale il 26 gennaio 2006)., US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (Dec. 8, 2003)

un.org

unhchr.ch

uscourts.gov

ca6.uscourts.gov

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

  • Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change (archiviato dall'url originale il 26 gennaio 2006)., US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (Dec. 8, 2003):

    We have been leaders in bringing arguments for a woman's right to choose abortion within the rubric of international human rights. However, there is no binding hard norm that recognizes women's right to terminate a pregnancy. (...) While there are hard norms prohibiting sex discrimination that apply to girl adolescents, these are problematic since they must be applied to a substantive right (i.e., the right to health) and the substantive reproductive rights of adolescents are not `hard' (yet!). There are no hard norms on age discrimination that would protect adolescents' ability to exercise their rights to reproductive health, sexual education, or reproductive decisionmaking. In addition, there are no hard norms prohibiting discrimination based on marital status, which is often an issue with respect to unmarried adolescents' access to reproductive health services and information. The soft norms support the idea that the hard norms apply to adolescents under 18. They also fill in the substantive gaps in the hard norms with respect to reproductive health services and information as well as adolescents' reproductive autonomy. (...) There are no hard norms in international human rights law that directly address HIV/AIDS directly. At the same time, a number of human rights bodies have developed soft norms to secure rights that are rendered vulnerable by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. (...) Practices with implications for women's reproductive rights in relation to HIV/AIDS are still not fully covered under existing international law, although soft norms have addressed them to some extent. (...) There is a lack of explicit prohibition of mandatory testing of HIV-positive pregnant women under international law. (...) None of the global human rights treaties explicitly prohibit child marriage and no treaty prescribes an appropriate minimum age for marriage. The onus of specifying a minimum age at marriage rests with the states' parties to these treaties. (...) We have to rely extensively on soft norms that have evolved from the TMBs and that are contained in conference documents to assert that child marriage is a violation of fundamental human rights.

  • Amnesty International, Defenders of Sexual and Reproductive Rights (archiviato dall'url originale il 2 ottobre 2013).; International Women’s Health Coalition and the United Nations., Campaign for an Inter-American Convention on Sexual and Reproductive Rights., Women's Health Collection, Abortion as a human right: possible strategies in unexplored territory. (Sexual Rights and Reproductive Rights),. (2003); and Shanthi Dairiam, Applying the CEDAW Convention for the recognition of women's health rights., Arrows For Change, (2002). In this regard, the Center for Reproductive Rights has noted that:

    Our goal is to ensure that governments worldwide guarantee women's reproductive rights out of an understanding that they are bound to do so. The two principal prerequisites for achieving this goal are: (1) the strengthening of international legal norms protecting reproductive rights; and (2) consistent and effective action on the part of civil society and the international community to enforce these norms. Each of these conditions, in turn, depends upon profound social change at the local, national and international (including regional) levels. (...) Ultimately, we must persuade governments to accept reproductive rights as binding norms. Again, our approach can move forward on several fronts, with interventions both at the national and international levels. Governments' recognition of reproductive rights norms may be indicated by their support for progressive language in international conference documents or by their adoption and implementation of appropriate national-level legislative and policy instruments. In order to counter opposition to an expansion of recognized reproductive rights norms, we have questioned the credibility of such reactionary yet influential international actors as the United States and the Holy See. Our activities to garner support for international protections of reproductive rights include: Lobbying government delegations at UN conferences and producing supporting analyses/materials; fostering alliances with members of civil society who may become influential on their national delegations to the UN; and preparing briefing papers and factsheets exposing the broad anti-woman agenda of our opposition.

    Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change (archiviato dall'url originale il 26 gennaio 2006)., US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (Dec. 8, 2003)