Morte di Elaine Herzberg (Italian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Morte di Elaine Herzberg" in Italian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Italian rank
814th place
1,646th place
7th place
19th place
2,840th place
low place
49th place
129th place
1,690th place
6,763rd place
12th place
32nd place
1,400th place
4,435th place
34th place
116th place
1,153rd place
2,696th place
108th place
238th place
1st place
1st place
388th place
920th place
92nd place
290th place
low place
low place
170th place
423rd place
8th place
23rd place
166th place
368th place
79th place
214th place
9,781st place
low place
36th place
90th place
2,272nd place
low place
95th place
341st place
8,026th place
low place
5th place
26th place
6th place
8th place
2nd place
7th place
332nd place
894th place
8,768th place
low place
low place
low place
114th place
349th place
2,941st place
6,205th place
23rd place
88th place
low place
low place
652nd place
1,028th place
6,714th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

aaa.com

newsroom.aaa.com

  • Megan McKernan, AAA Tests Shine High-Beam on Headlight Limitations, NewsRoom.AAA.com, 13 maggio 2015. URL consultato il 3 luglio 2018.
    «AAA’s test results suggest that halogen headlights, found in over 80 percent of vehicles on the road today, may fail to safely illuminate unlit roadways at speeds as low as 40 mph. ...high-beam settings on halogen headlights...may only provide enough light to safely stop at speeds of up to 48 mph, leaving drivers vulnerable at highway speeds...Additional testing found that while the advanced headlight technology found in HID and LED headlights illuminated dark roadways 25 percent further than their halogen counterparts, they still may fail to fully illuminate roadways at speeds greater than 45 mph. High-beam settings on these advanced headlights offered significant improvement over low-beam settings, lighting distances of up to 500 feet (equal to 55 mph). Despite the increase, even the most advanced headlights fall 60 percent short of the sight distance that the full light of day provides.»

abc15.com

archive.org

arstechnica.com

azcentral.com

azgovernor.gov

azleg.gov

bbc.co.uk

box.com

uber.app.box.com

  • Uber ATG Safety Report, su uber.app.box.com, Uber Advanced Technologies Group. URL consultato l'11 dicembre 2018.
    «Self-driving vehicles hold the potential to drive more safely than a human driver. Computers can look in all directions at once, and they don’t get distracted, fatigued, or impaired. (pg 13)»

cbsnews.com

chicagotribune.com

citylab.com

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

  • 49 CFR 392.14 - Hazardous conditions; extreme caution., in US Code of Federal Regulations.
    «Extreme caution in the operation of a commercial motor vehicle shall be exercised when hazardous conditions, such as those caused by snow, ice, sleet, fog, mist, rain, dust, or smoke, adversely affect visibility or traction. Speed shall be reduced when such conditions exist. If conditions become sufficiently dangerous, the operation of the commercial motor vehicle shall be discontinued and shall not be resumed until the commercial motor vehicle can be safely operated. Whenever compliance with the foregoing provisions of this rule increases hazard to passengers, the commercial motor vehicle may be operated to the nearest point at which the safety of passengers is assured.»

doi.org

dx.doi.org

dot.gov

fmcsa.dot.gov

  • Section 2 – Driving Safely, in Commercial Driver License Manual 2005, United States Department of Transportation, luglio 2014, pp. 2–15, 2–19, 2–26, 13–1.
    «[pg 2-15] 2.6.4 – Speed and Distance Ahead: You should always be able to stop within the distance you can see ahead. Fog, rain, or other conditions may require that you slowdown to be able to stop in the distance you can see. ... [pg 2-19] 2.8.3 – Drivers Who Are Hazards: Vehicles may be partly hidden by blind intersections or alleys. If you only can see the rear or front end of a vehicle but not the driver, then he or she can't see you. Be alert because he/she may back out or enter into your lane. Always be prepared to stop. ... [pg 2-26] 2.11.4 – Vehicle Factors: Headlights. At night your headlights will usually be the main source of light for you to see by and for others to see you. You can't see nearly as much with your headlights as you see in the daytime. With low beams you can see ahead about 250 feet and with high beams about 350-500 feet. You must adjust your speed to keep your stopping distance within your sight distance. This means going slowly enough to be able to stop within the range of your headlights. ... [pg 13-1] 13.1.2 – Intersections As you approach an intersection: Check traffic thoroughly in all directions. Decelerate gently. Brake smoothly and, if necessary, change gears. If necessary, come to a complete stop (no coasting) behind any stop signs, signals, sidewalks, or stop lines maintaining a safe gap behind any vehicle in front of you. Your vehicle must not roll forward or backward. When driving through an intersection: Check traffic thoroughly in all directions. Decelerate and yield to any pedestrians and traffic in the intersection. Do not change lanes while proceeding through the intersection. Keep your hands on the wheel.»

crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov

  • Cherian Varghese, Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities by Day and Night – A Contrast, su crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, maggio 2007.
    «The passenger vehicle occupant fatality rate at nighttime is about three times higher than the daytime rate. ...The data shows a higher percentage of passenger vehicle occupants killed in speeding-related crashes at nighttime.»

www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov

  • Overview: 2013 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 169) (PDF), su www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, luglio 2015.
    «motor vehicle crashes in 2013 were the leading cause of death for children age 4 and every age from 16 to 24. ... An average of...one fatality every 16 minutes. ... The estimated economic cost of all motor vehicle traffic crashes in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cost data is available) was $242 billion. ... When quality of life valuations are considered, the total value of societal harm from motor vehicle crashes in the United States in 2010 was an estimated $836 billion. ... Speeding is one of the most prevalent factors contributing to traffic crashes.»

ieee.org

spectrum.ieee.org

independent.co.uk

infrastructure.gov.au

  • C.N. Kloeden, Travelling Speed and the Risk of Crash Involvement (PDF), su infrastructure.gov.au, vol. 1, NHMRC Road Accident Research Unit, The University of Adelaide, p. 54.
    «the relative risk of an injury crash when travelling at 65 km/h in a 60 km/h speed limit zone is similar to that associated with driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05 g/100mL. By strange coincidence, if the blood alcohol concentration is multiplied by 100, and the resulting number is added to 60 km/h, the risk of involvement in a casualty crash associated with that travelling speed is almost the same as the risk associated with the blood alcohol concentration. Hence, the risk is similar for 0.05 and 65, as noted; for 0.08 and 68; for .12 and 72, and so on...»

journalistsresource.org

  • Leighton Walter Kille, Transportation safety over time: Cars, planes, trains, walking, cycling, su journalistsresource.org, Harvard Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center and the Carnegie-Knight Initiative, 5 ottobre 2014.
    «Since 1980 the average horsepower of U.S. cars more than doubled, and speed limits have risen significantly, greatly increasing the potential for damage, loss of life and injuries. ... "One might argue that transportation equipment, and in particular the motor vehicle, must be the most dangerous machines that we interact with on a daily basis," the researcher states. "The annual toll in motor vehicle crashes exceeds the deaths resulting from the next most dangerous mechanical device, firearms, by about 40%."»

npr.org

  • Rae Ellen Bichell, Scientists Still Seek A Reliable DUI Test For Marijuana, National Public Radio, 30 luglio 2017.
    «Though a blood test exists that can detect some of marijuana's components, there is no widely accepted, standardized amount in the breath or blood that gives police or courts or anyone else a good sense of who is impaired. ... "And it shocked everyone, including ourselves, that we could measure, in some of these individuals, THC in the blood for 30 days," says Marilyn Huestis, a toxicologist with the University of Maryland School of Medicine who recently retired from leading a lab at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. ... Conversely, another study showed that people who weren't regular consumers could smoke a joint right in front of researchers and yet show no evidence of cannabis in their blood. So, in addition to being invasive and cumbersome, the blood test can be misleading and a poor indicator of whatever is happening in the brain.»
  • Neuman, Scott, Uber Reaches Settlement With Family Of Arizona Woman Killed By Driverless Car, in National Public Radio, 29 marzo 2018. URL consultato il 29 marzo 2018.

ntsb.gov

nytimes.com

  • Daisuke Wakabayashi, Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam, in The New York Times, 19 marzo 2018. URL consultato il 22 marzo 2018.
  • Bill Vlasic e Neal E. Boudette, Self-Driving Tesla Was Involved in Fatal Crash, U.S. Says, in The New York Times, 30 giugno 2016. URL consultato l'11 dicembre 2018.
    «the driver of a Tesla Model S electric sedan was killed in an accident when the car was in self-driving mode»
  • (EN) Troy Griggs, How a Self-Driving Uber Killed a Pedestrian in Arizona, in The New York Times, 20 marzo 2018. URL consultato il 17 maggio 2018.
  • (EN) Mike Isaac, Daisuke Wakabayashi e Kate Conger, After Fatal Accident, Uber’s Vision of Self-Driving Cars Begins to Blur., 19 agosto 2018, p. B1. URL consultato il 25 agosto 2018.
    «preliminary findings from federal regulators investigating the crash confirmed what many self-driving car experts suspected: Uber’s self-driving car should have detected a pedestrian with enough time to stop, but it failed to do so.»
  • (EN) Daisuke Wakabayashi e Kate Conger, Uber’s Self-Driving Cars Are Set to Return in a Downsized Test, in The New York Times, 5 dicembre 2018. URL consultato il 7 dicembre 2018.
    «The cars have reacted more slowly than human drivers and struggled to pass so-called track validation tests...Dara Khosrowshahi, the chief executive, acknowledged errors in Uber’s earlier driverless car efforts. “We did screw up,” he said in comments provided by Uber...as recently as a few weeks ago, the company’s autonomous vehicle unit, Uber Advanced Technologies Group, or A.T.G., was still experiencing track testing “failures” on different versions of its software, according internal company emails. To match the reaction time of a human driver at 25 m.p.h., the cars needed to drive “20% slower than a human,” Brandon Basso, a director at A.T.G., said in a Nov. 1 email. Even at slower speeds, the cars were passing only 82 percent of track tests, according to company documents...a test in early November ran Uber’s vehicles through more than 70 categories at 25 m.p.h., they failed in 10 of them, including being slow to recognize another car that didn’t yield.»
  • Kang, Cecilia, Where Self-Driving Cars Go to Learn, in The New York Times, 11 novembre 2017. URL consultato il 27 marzo 2018.

phoenixnewtimes.com

popsci.com

reuters.com

sfchronicle.com

sfgate.com

streetsblog.org

usa.streetsblog.org

theguardian.com

thetimes.co.uk

theverge.com

thomsonreuters.com

legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com

  • Lawyers Cooperative Publishing, New York Jurisprudence, collana Automobiles and Other Vehicles, Miamisburg, OH, LEXIS Publishing, p. § 720, OCLC 321177421.
    «It is negligence as a matter of law to drive a motor vehicle at such a rate of speed that it cannot be stopped in time to avoid an obstruction discernible within the driver's length of vision ahead of him. This rule is known generally as the `assured clear distance ahead' rule * * * In application, the rule constantly changes as the motorist proceeds, and is measured at any moment by the distance between the motorist's vehicle and the limit of his vision ahead, or by the distance between the vehicle and any intermediate discernible static or forward-moving object in the street or highway ahead constituting an obstruction in his path. Such rule requires a motorist in the exercise of due care at all times to see, or to know from having seen, that the road is clear or apparently clear and safe for travel, a sufficient distance ahead to make it apparently safe to advance at the speed employed.»

ttnews.com

twitter.com

virginia.gov

law.lis.virginia.gov

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

  • Lawyers Cooperative Publishing, New York Jurisprudence, collana Automobiles and Other Vehicles, Miamisburg, OH, LEXIS Publishing, p. § 720, OCLC 321177421.
    «It is negligence as a matter of law to drive a motor vehicle at such a rate of speed that it cannot be stopped in time to avoid an obstruction discernible within the driver's length of vision ahead of him. This rule is known generally as the `assured clear distance ahead' rule * * * In application, the rule constantly changes as the motorist proceeds, and is measured at any moment by the distance between the motorist's vehicle and the limit of his vision ahead, or by the distance between the vehicle and any intermediate discernible static or forward-moving object in the street or highway ahead constituting an obstruction in his path. Such rule requires a motorist in the exercise of due care at all times to see, or to know from having seen, that the road is clear or apparently clear and safe for travel, a sufficient distance ahead to make it apparently safe to advance at the speed employed.»

wsj.com