Richard Van Noorden, Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network, in Nature, vol. 512, n. 7513, 13 agosto 2014, pp. 126–129, Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V, DOI:10.1038/512126a, PMID25119221. Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it. Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked. Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
Richard Van Noorden, Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network, in Nature, vol. 512, n. 7513, 13 agosto 2014, pp. 126–129, Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V, DOI:10.1038/512126a, PMID25119221. Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it. Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked. Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Richard Van Noorden, Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network, in Nature, vol. 512, n. 7513, 13 agosto 2014, pp. 126–129, Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V, DOI:10.1038/512126a, PMID25119221. Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it. Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked. Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
oadoi.org
Richard Van Noorden, Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network, in Nature, vol. 512, n. 7513, 13 agosto 2014, pp. 126–129, Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V, DOI:10.1038/512126a, PMID25119221. Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it. Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked. Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
