Rupert Sheldrake (Italian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Rupert Sheldrake" in Italian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Italian rank

6books.google.com

3^rd place

14^th place

3theguardian.com

12^th place

32^nd place

3harvard.edu

18^th place

104^th place

3doi.org

2^nd place

7^th place

3nih.gov

4^th place

9^th place

2archive.org

6^th place

8^th place

2scientificamerican.com

896^th place

1,590^th place

1oadoi.org

799^th place

22^nd place

1nature.com

234^th place

226^th place

1sheldrake.org

low place

1newrepublic.com

1,948^th place

5,589^th place

1skepticalinquirer.org

5,915^th place

low place

archive.org

(EN) Martin Gardner, The New Age: notes of a fringe-watcher, Prometheus Books, 1988, p. 112, ISBN 9781615925773.
«Almost all scientists who have looked into Sheldrake's theory consider it balderdash.»
(EN) Ruchir Sharma, Breakout Nations: In Pursuit of the Next Economic Miracles, W. W. Norton & Company, 2012, ISBN 9780393083835.
«Despite Sheldrake's legitimate scientific credentials, his peers have roundly dismissed his theory as pseudoscience.»

books.google.com

(EN) Rupert Sheldrake, Terence K. McKenna e Ralph Abraham, Chaos, Creativity, and Cosmic Consciousness, Rochester (Vermont), Inner Traditions / Bear & Co, 2011, pp. 181-182, ISBN 9781594777714.
(EN) Rupert Sheldrake, The Presence of the Past: morphic resonance and the habits of nature, Londra, Icon Books, 2011, ISBN 9781848313132.
(EN) Bruce Hood, Supersense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable, San Francisco, HarperOne, 2009, p. 232, ISBN 9780061867934.
«Sheldrake proposes that the sense of being stared at and other aspects of paranormal ability, such as telepathy and knowing about events in the future before they happen, are all evidence for a new field theory that he calls 'morphic resonance.' [...] The trouble is that, whereas electric and magnetic fields are easily measurable and obey laws, morphic resonance remains elusive and has no demonstrable laws. No other area of science would accept such lawless, weak evidence as proof, which is why the majority of the scientific community has generally dismissed this theory and the evidence.»
(EN) Lawrence R. Samuel, Supernatural America: A Cultural History, Santa Barbara (California), ABC-CLIO, 2011, ISBN 9780313398995.
«[...] most biologists considered Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonance hogwash [...]»
(EN) Kendrick Frazier, The Hundredth Monkey and other Paradigms of the Paranormal, Buffalo (New York), Prometheus, 1991, p. 171, ISBN 9781615924011.
(EN) Carl T. Gunther, The Vital Dimension: A Quest for Mind, Memory and God in the Thickness of Time, Lincoln (Nebraska), iUniverse, 2006, p. 60, ISBN 9780595402977.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

(EN) John Whitfield, Telepathic charm seduces audience at paranormal debate, in Nature, vol. 427, n. 6972, 22 gennaio 2004, p. 277, Bibcode:2004Natur.427..277W, DOI:10.1038/427277b, PMID 14737136.
(EN) John Maddox, A book for burning?, in Nature, vol. 293, n. 5830, 24 settembre 1981, pp. 245–246, Bibcode:1981Natur.293R.245., DOI:10.1038/293245b0.
«Sheldrake's argument is in no sense a scientific argument but is an exercise in pseudo-science.»
(EN) Michael Shermer, Rupert's Resonance, in Scientific American, vol. 293, n. 5, 1º novembre 2005, p. 38, Bibcode:2005SciAm.293e..38S, DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-38, PMID 16318024.

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

(EN) John Whitfield, Telepathic charm seduces audience at paranormal debate, in Nature, vol. 427, n. 6972, 22 gennaio 2004, p. 277, Bibcode:2004Natur.427..277W, DOI:10.1038/427277b, PMID 14737136.
(EN) John Maddox, A book for burning?, in Nature, vol. 293, n. 5830, 24 settembre 1981, pp. 245–246, Bibcode:1981Natur.293R.245., DOI:10.1038/293245b0.
«Sheldrake's argument is in no sense a scientific argument but is an exercise in pseudo-science.»
(EN) Michael Shermer, Rupert's Resonance, in Scientific American, vol. 293, n. 5, 1º novembre 2005, p. 38, Bibcode:2005SciAm.293e..38S, DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-38, PMID 16318024.

nature.com

(EN) John Maddox, A book for burning?, in Nature, vol. 293, n. 5830, 24 settembre 1981, pp. 245–246, Bibcode:1981Natur.293R.245., DOI:10.1038/293245b0.
«Sheldrake's argument is in no sense a scientific argument but is an exercise in pseudo-science.»

newrepublic.com

(EN) Jerry A. Coyne, Pseudoscientist Rupert Sheldrake Is Not Being Persecuted, And Is Not Like Galileo, in The New Republic, 8 novembre 2013. URL consultato l'11 marzo 2023.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

(EN) John Whitfield, Telepathic charm seduces audience at paranormal debate, in Nature, vol. 427, n. 6972, 22 gennaio 2004, p. 277, Bibcode:2004Natur.427..277W, DOI:10.1038/427277b, PMID 14737136.
(EN) Steven Rose, So-called "formative causation" - A hypothesis disconfirmed, in Rivista di Biologia, vol. 85, n. 3/4, 1992, pp. 445–453, PMID 1341837.
«Along with parapsychology, corn circles, creationism, ley-lines and "deep ecology," "formative causation," or "morphic resonance" has many of the characteristics of such pseudosciences [...]»
(EN) Michael Shermer, Rupert's Resonance, in Scientific American, vol. 293, n. 5, 1º novembre 2005, p. 38, Bibcode:2005SciAm.293e..38S, DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-38, PMID 16318024.

oadoi.org

(EN) John Whitfield, Telepathic charm seduces audience at paranormal debate, in Nature, vol. 427, n. 6972, 22 gennaio 2004, p. 277, Bibcode:2004Natur.427..277W, DOI:10.1038/427277b, PMID 14737136.

scientificamerican.com

(EN) Michael Shermer, Rupert's Resonance, in Scientific American, vol. 293, n. 5, 1º novembre 2005, p. 38, Bibcode:2005SciAm.293e..38S, DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-38, PMID 16318024.

blogs.scientificamerican.com

(EN) John Horgan, Scientific Heretic Rupert Sheldrake on Morphic Fields, Psychic Dogs and Other Mysteries, su blogs.scientificamerican.com, 14 luglio 2014. URL consultato l'11 marzo 2023.

sheldrake.org

(EN) Steven Rose, So-called "formative causation" - A hypothesis disconfirmed, in Rivista di Biologia, vol. 85, n. 3/4, 1992, pp. 445–453, PMID 1341837.
«Along with parapsychology, corn circles, creationism, ley-lines and "deep ecology," "formative causation," or "morphic resonance" has many of the characteristics of such pseudosciences [...]»

skepticalinquirer.org

(EN) David F. Marks e John Colwell, The psychic staring effect: An artifact of pseudo-randomization, in Skeptical Inquirer, vol. 24, n. 5, settembre-ottobre 2000, p. 49.

theguardian.com

(EN) Tim Adams, Rupert Sheldrake: the 'heretic' at odds with scientific dogma, in The Guardian, 4 febbraio 2012. URL consultato l'11 marzo 2023.
(EN) Susan Blackmore, An idea with resonance: More than anything, Sheldrake's continuing popularity is rooted in our need to believe, in The Guardian, 4 febbraio 2009. URL consultato l'11 marzo 2023.
(EN) Adam Rutherford, A book for ignoring: Sheldrake persists in his claims, despite the fact that there's no evidence for them. This is bad science, in The Guardian, 6 febbraio 2009. URL consultato l'11 marzo 2023.