Sottorete (Italian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sottorete" in Italian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Italian rank

5ietf.org

214^th place

651^st place

3cisco.com

2,882^nd place

4,120^th place

1getipv6.info

low place

cisco.com

Penis Document ID 13711 - Subnet Zero and the All-Ones Subnet, su cisco.com, Cisco Systems, Inc., 10 agosto 2005. URL consultato il 25 aprile 2010.
«Traditionally, it was strongly recommended that subnet zero and the all-ones subnet not be used for addressing. [...] Today, the use of subnet zero and the all-ones subnet is generally accepted and most vendors support their use.»
Document ID 13711 - Subnet Zero and the All-Ones Subnet, su cisco.com, Cisco Systems, Inc., 10 agosto 2005. URL consultato il 23 aprile 2010.
«the first [...] subnet[...], known as subnet zero»
Document ID 13711 - Subnet Zero and the All-Ones Subnet, su cisco.com, Cisco Systems, Inc., 10 agosto 2005. URL consultato il 23 aprile 2010.
«[...] the last subnet[...], known as [...] the all-ones subnet»

getipv6.info

IPv6 Addressing Plans, su getipv6.info, ARIN IPv6 Wiki. URL consultato il 25 aprile 2010.
«All customers get one /48 unless they can show that they need more than 65k subnets. [...] If you have lots of consumer customers you may want to assign /56s to private residence sites.»

ietf.org

tools.ietf.org

Jeffrey Mogul, Jon Postel, RFC 950 - Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure, su tools.ietf.org, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), agosto 1985, p. 1.
«[...]subnets[...] of Internet networks[...] are logically visible sub-sections of a single Internet network.»
Jeffrey Mogul, Jon Postel, RFC 950 - Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure, su tools.ietf.org, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), agosto 1985, p. 16.
«Subnet[:] One or more physical networks forming a subset of an Internet network. A subnet is explicitly identified in the Internet address.»
Jeffrey Mogul, Jon Postel, RFC 950 - Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure, su tools.ietf.org, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), agosto 1985, p. 6. URL consultato il 23 aprile 2010.
«It is useful to preserve and extend the interpretation of these special addresses in subnetted networks. This means the values of all zeros and all ones in the subnet field should not be assigned to actual (physical) subnets.»

Troy Pummill, Bill Manning, RFC 1878 - Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4, su tools.ietf.org, dicembre 1995.

«This practice is obsolete! Modern software will be able to utilize all definable networks.»

Note: RFC 1878 is not on the IETF standards track. It states of itself: "This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.". It was published as "Category: Informational", and has since been demoted to "Category: Historic". RFC 950 is not marked as obsoleted as of today (2010-04-25). Which means that it is still current. It is therefore questionable whether a non-standards-track RFC may invalidate a non-obsoleted standards-track RFC.

datatracker.ietf.org

Troy Pummill, Bill Manning, RFC 1878 - Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4, su tools.ietf.org, dicembre 1995.

«This practice is obsolete! Modern software will be able to utilize all definable networks.»

Note: RFC 1878 is not on the IETF standards track. It states of itself: "This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.". It was published as "Category: Informational", and has since been demoted to "Category: Historic". RFC 950 is not marked as obsoleted as of today (2010-04-25). Which means that it is still current. It is therefore questionable whether a non-standards-track RFC may invalidate a non-obsoleted standards-track RFC.