* Andrew Sanger, The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010, vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, p. 429, DOI:10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_14, ISBN978-90-6704-811-8, ISSN 1389-1359 (WC · ACNP). URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Israel claims it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, maintaining that it is neither a Stale nor a territory occupied or controlled by Israel, but rather it has 'sui generis' status. Pursuant to the Disengagement Plan, Israel dismantled all military institutions and settlements in Gaza and there is no longer a permanent Israeli military or civilian presence in the territory. However the Plan also provided that Israel will guard and monitor the external land perimeter of the Gaza Strip, will continue to maintain exclusive authority in Gaza air space, and will continue to exercise security activity in the sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip as well as maintaining an Israeli military presence on the Egyptian-Gaza border. and reserving the right to reenter Gaza at will. Israel continues to control six of Gaza's seven land crossings, its maritime borders and airspace and the movement of goods and persons in and out of the territory. Egypt controls one of Gaza's land crossings. Troops from the Israeli Defence Force regularly enter pans of the territory and/or deploy missile attacks, drones and sonic bombs into Gaza. Israel has declared a no-go buffer zone that stretches deep into Gaza: if Gazans enter this zone they are shot on sight. Gaza is also dependent on Israel for water, electricity, telecommunications and other utilities, currency, issuing IDs, and permits to enter and leave the territory. Israel also has sole control of the Palestinian Population Registry through which the Israeli Army regulates who is classified as a Palestinian and who is a Gazan or West Banker. Since 2000 aside from a limited number of exceptions Israel has refused to add people to the Palestinian Population Registry. It is this direct external control over Gaza and indirect control over life within Gaza that has led the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Fact Finding Mission to Gaza, International human rights organisations, US Government websites, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and a significant number of legal commentators, to reject the argument that Gaza is no longer occupied." * Iain Scobbie, International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, a cura di Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 295, ISBN978-0-19-965775-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Even after the accession to power of Hamas, Israel's claim that it no longer occupies Gaza has not been accepted by UN bodies, most States, nor the majority of academic commentators because of its exclusive control of its border with Gaza and crossing points including the effective control it exerted over the Rafah crossing until at least May 2011, its control of Gaza's maritime zones and airspace which constitute what Aronson terms the 'security envelope' around Gaza, as well as its ability to intervene forcibly at will in Gaza." * Michelle Gawerc, Prefiguring Peace: Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding Partnerships, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 44, ISBN978-0-7391-6610-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 6 marzo 2016)."While Israel withdrew from the immediate territory, it remained in control of all access to and from Gaza through the border crossings, as well as through the coastline and the airspace. In addition, Gaza was dependent upon Israel for water, electricity sewage communication networks and for its trade (Gisha 2007. Dowty 2008). ln other words, while Israel maintained that its occupation of Gaza ended with its unilateral disengagement Palestinians - as well as many human right organizations and international bodies - argued that Gaza was by all intents and purposes still occupied."
google.co.uk
books.google.co.uk
* Andrew Sanger, The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010, vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, p. 429, DOI:10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_14, ISBN978-90-6704-811-8, ISSN 1389-1359 (WC · ACNP). URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Israel claims it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, maintaining that it is neither a Stale nor a territory occupied or controlled by Israel, but rather it has 'sui generis' status. Pursuant to the Disengagement Plan, Israel dismantled all military institutions and settlements in Gaza and there is no longer a permanent Israeli military or civilian presence in the territory. However the Plan also provided that Israel will guard and monitor the external land perimeter of the Gaza Strip, will continue to maintain exclusive authority in Gaza air space, and will continue to exercise security activity in the sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip as well as maintaining an Israeli military presence on the Egyptian-Gaza border. and reserving the right to reenter Gaza at will. Israel continues to control six of Gaza's seven land crossings, its maritime borders and airspace and the movement of goods and persons in and out of the territory. Egypt controls one of Gaza's land crossings. Troops from the Israeli Defence Force regularly enter pans of the territory and/or deploy missile attacks, drones and sonic bombs into Gaza. Israel has declared a no-go buffer zone that stretches deep into Gaza: if Gazans enter this zone they are shot on sight. Gaza is also dependent on Israel for water, electricity, telecommunications and other utilities, currency, issuing IDs, and permits to enter and leave the territory. Israel also has sole control of the Palestinian Population Registry through which the Israeli Army regulates who is classified as a Palestinian and who is a Gazan or West Banker. Since 2000 aside from a limited number of exceptions Israel has refused to add people to the Palestinian Population Registry. It is this direct external control over Gaza and indirect control over life within Gaza that has led the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Fact Finding Mission to Gaza, International human rights organisations, US Government websites, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and a significant number of legal commentators, to reject the argument that Gaza is no longer occupied." * Iain Scobbie, International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, a cura di Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 295, ISBN978-0-19-965775-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Even after the accession to power of Hamas, Israel's claim that it no longer occupies Gaza has not been accepted by UN bodies, most States, nor the majority of academic commentators because of its exclusive control of its border with Gaza and crossing points including the effective control it exerted over the Rafah crossing until at least May 2011, its control of Gaza's maritime zones and airspace which constitute what Aronson terms the 'security envelope' around Gaza, as well as its ability to intervene forcibly at will in Gaza." * Michelle Gawerc, Prefiguring Peace: Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding Partnerships, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 44, ISBN978-0-7391-6610-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 6 marzo 2016)."While Israel withdrew from the immediate territory, it remained in control of all access to and from Gaza through the border crossings, as well as through the coastline and the airspace. In addition, Gaza was dependent upon Israel for water, electricity sewage communication networks and for its trade (Gisha 2007. Dowty 2008). ln other words, while Israel maintained that its occupation of Gaza ended with its unilateral disengagement Palestinians - as well as many human right organizations and international bodies - argued that Gaza was by all intents and purposes still occupied."
* Andrew Sanger, The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010, vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, p. 429, DOI:10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_14, ISBN978-90-6704-811-8, ISSN 1389-1359 (WC · ACNP). URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Israel claims it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, maintaining that it is neither a Stale nor a territory occupied or controlled by Israel, but rather it has 'sui generis' status. Pursuant to the Disengagement Plan, Israel dismantled all military institutions and settlements in Gaza and there is no longer a permanent Israeli military or civilian presence in the territory. However the Plan also provided that Israel will guard and monitor the external land perimeter of the Gaza Strip, will continue to maintain exclusive authority in Gaza air space, and will continue to exercise security activity in the sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip as well as maintaining an Israeli military presence on the Egyptian-Gaza border. and reserving the right to reenter Gaza at will. Israel continues to control six of Gaza's seven land crossings, its maritime borders and airspace and the movement of goods and persons in and out of the territory. Egypt controls one of Gaza's land crossings. Troops from the Israeli Defence Force regularly enter pans of the territory and/or deploy missile attacks, drones and sonic bombs into Gaza. Israel has declared a no-go buffer zone that stretches deep into Gaza: if Gazans enter this zone they are shot on sight. Gaza is also dependent on Israel for water, electricity, telecommunications and other utilities, currency, issuing IDs, and permits to enter and leave the territory. Israel also has sole control of the Palestinian Population Registry through which the Israeli Army regulates who is classified as a Palestinian and who is a Gazan or West Banker. Since 2000 aside from a limited number of exceptions Israel has refused to add people to the Palestinian Population Registry. It is this direct external control over Gaza and indirect control over life within Gaza that has led the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Fact Finding Mission to Gaza, International human rights organisations, US Government websites, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and a significant number of legal commentators, to reject the argument that Gaza is no longer occupied." * Iain Scobbie, International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, a cura di Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 295, ISBN978-0-19-965775-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Even after the accession to power of Hamas, Israel's claim that it no longer occupies Gaza has not been accepted by UN bodies, most States, nor the majority of academic commentators because of its exclusive control of its border with Gaza and crossing points including the effective control it exerted over the Rafah crossing until at least May 2011, its control of Gaza's maritime zones and airspace which constitute what Aronson terms the 'security envelope' around Gaza, as well as its ability to intervene forcibly at will in Gaza." * Michelle Gawerc, Prefiguring Peace: Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding Partnerships, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 44, ISBN978-0-7391-6610-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 6 marzo 2016)."While Israel withdrew from the immediate territory, it remained in control of all access to and from Gaza through the border crossings, as well as through the coastline and the airspace. In addition, Gaza was dependent upon Israel for water, electricity sewage communication networks and for its trade (Gisha 2007. Dowty 2008). ln other words, while Israel maintained that its occupation of Gaza ended with its unilateral disengagement Palestinians - as well as many human right organizations and international bodies - argued that Gaza was by all intents and purposes still occupied."
web.archive.org
Gaza Strip, in UN OCHA. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 14 agosto 2016).
* Andrew Sanger, The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010, vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, p. 429, DOI:10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_14, ISBN978-90-6704-811-8, ISSN 1389-1359 (WC · ACNP). URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Israel claims it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, maintaining that it is neither a Stale nor a territory occupied or controlled by Israel, but rather it has 'sui generis' status. Pursuant to the Disengagement Plan, Israel dismantled all military institutions and settlements in Gaza and there is no longer a permanent Israeli military or civilian presence in the territory. However the Plan also provided that Israel will guard and monitor the external land perimeter of the Gaza Strip, will continue to maintain exclusive authority in Gaza air space, and will continue to exercise security activity in the sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip as well as maintaining an Israeli military presence on the Egyptian-Gaza border. and reserving the right to reenter Gaza at will. Israel continues to control six of Gaza's seven land crossings, its maritime borders and airspace and the movement of goods and persons in and out of the territory. Egypt controls one of Gaza's land crossings. Troops from the Israeli Defence Force regularly enter pans of the territory and/or deploy missile attacks, drones and sonic bombs into Gaza. Israel has declared a no-go buffer zone that stretches deep into Gaza: if Gazans enter this zone they are shot on sight. Gaza is also dependent on Israel for water, electricity, telecommunications and other utilities, currency, issuing IDs, and permits to enter and leave the territory. Israel also has sole control of the Palestinian Population Registry through which the Israeli Army regulates who is classified as a Palestinian and who is a Gazan or West Banker. Since 2000 aside from a limited number of exceptions Israel has refused to add people to the Palestinian Population Registry. It is this direct external control over Gaza and indirect control over life within Gaza that has led the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Fact Finding Mission to Gaza, International human rights organisations, US Government websites, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and a significant number of legal commentators, to reject the argument that Gaza is no longer occupied." * Iain Scobbie, International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, a cura di Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 295, ISBN978-0-19-965775-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Even after the accession to power of Hamas, Israel's claim that it no longer occupies Gaza has not been accepted by UN bodies, most States, nor the majority of academic commentators because of its exclusive control of its border with Gaza and crossing points including the effective control it exerted over the Rafah crossing until at least May 2011, its control of Gaza's maritime zones and airspace which constitute what Aronson terms the 'security envelope' around Gaza, as well as its ability to intervene forcibly at will in Gaza." * Michelle Gawerc, Prefiguring Peace: Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding Partnerships, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 44, ISBN978-0-7391-6610-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 6 marzo 2016)."While Israel withdrew from the immediate territory, it remained in control of all access to and from Gaza through the border crossings, as well as through the coastline and the airspace. In addition, Gaza was dependent upon Israel for water, electricity sewage communication networks and for its trade (Gisha 2007. Dowty 2008). ln other words, while Israel maintained that its occupation of Gaza ended with its unilateral disengagement Palestinians - as well as many human right organizations and international bodies - argued that Gaza was by all intents and purposes still occupied."
William Safire, Year of the Stans, Nytimes.com, 31 dicembre 2006. URL consultato il 12 luglio 2011 (archiviato il 15 maggio 2018).
(EN) The Last Word: Mahmoud Zahar, su muslimvillage.com, 2 settembre 2005. URL consultato il 5 novembre 2022 (archiviato dall'url originale il 4 novembre 2014).
(EN) Field update on gaza from the humanitarian coordinator (PDF) (archiviato dall'url originale il 25 dicembre 2016), documento del United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, del 2 febbraio 2009
the World Factbook, su cia.gov. URL consultato il 27 dicembre 2008 (archiviato dall'url originale il 26 marzo 2020).
worldcat.org
* Andrew Sanger, The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010, vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, p. 429, DOI:10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_14, ISBN978-90-6704-811-8, ISSN 1389-1359 (WC · ACNP). URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Israel claims it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, maintaining that it is neither a Stale nor a territory occupied or controlled by Israel, but rather it has 'sui generis' status. Pursuant to the Disengagement Plan, Israel dismantled all military institutions and settlements in Gaza and there is no longer a permanent Israeli military or civilian presence in the territory. However the Plan also provided that Israel will guard and monitor the external land perimeter of the Gaza Strip, will continue to maintain exclusive authority in Gaza air space, and will continue to exercise security activity in the sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip as well as maintaining an Israeli military presence on the Egyptian-Gaza border. and reserving the right to reenter Gaza at will. Israel continues to control six of Gaza's seven land crossings, its maritime borders and airspace and the movement of goods and persons in and out of the territory. Egypt controls one of Gaza's land crossings. Troops from the Israeli Defence Force regularly enter pans of the territory and/or deploy missile attacks, drones and sonic bombs into Gaza. Israel has declared a no-go buffer zone that stretches deep into Gaza: if Gazans enter this zone they are shot on sight. Gaza is also dependent on Israel for water, electricity, telecommunications and other utilities, currency, issuing IDs, and permits to enter and leave the territory. Israel also has sole control of the Palestinian Population Registry through which the Israeli Army regulates who is classified as a Palestinian and who is a Gazan or West Banker. Since 2000 aside from a limited number of exceptions Israel has refused to add people to the Palestinian Population Registry. It is this direct external control over Gaza and indirect control over life within Gaza that has led the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Fact Finding Mission to Gaza, International human rights organisations, US Government websites, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and a significant number of legal commentators, to reject the argument that Gaza is no longer occupied." * Iain Scobbie, International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, a cura di Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 295, ISBN978-0-19-965775-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 5 marzo 2016)."Even after the accession to power of Hamas, Israel's claim that it no longer occupies Gaza has not been accepted by UN bodies, most States, nor the majority of academic commentators because of its exclusive control of its border with Gaza and crossing points including the effective control it exerted over the Rafah crossing until at least May 2011, its control of Gaza's maritime zones and airspace which constitute what Aronson terms the 'security envelope' around Gaza, as well as its ability to intervene forcibly at will in Gaza." * Michelle Gawerc, Prefiguring Peace: Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding Partnerships, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 44, ISBN978-0-7391-6610-9. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2016 (archiviato il 6 marzo 2016)."While Israel withdrew from the immediate territory, it remained in control of all access to and from Gaza through the border crossings, as well as through the coastline and the airspace. In addition, Gaza was dependent upon Israel for water, electricity sewage communication networks and for its trade (Gisha 2007. Dowty 2008). ln other words, while Israel maintained that its occupation of Gaza ended with its unilateral disengagement Palestinians - as well as many human right organizations and international bodies - argued that Gaza was by all intents and purposes still occupied."
