ストア派 (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ストア派" in Japanese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Japanese rank

4stanford.edu

179^th place

608^th place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

19^th place

2google.co.uk

504^th place

945^th place

2archive.org

6^th place

146^th place

1routledge.com

2,932^nd place

low place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

61^st place

1classicalstudies.org

low place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1samreligions.org

low place

1merriam-webster.com

209^th place

653^rd place

1cambridge.org

305^th place

825^th place

1doi.org

2^nd place

6^th place

1wikisource.org

27^th place

80^th place

1newadvent.org

471^st place

1,709^th place

1etymonline.com

287^th place

474^th place

archive.org

books.google.com

Gnuse, Robert Karl (1 May 1997). No Other Gods: Emergent Monotheism in Israel. Sheffield Academic Press. p. 225. ISBN 1-85075-657-0

cambridge.org

journals.cambridge.org

Cato's suicide in Plutarch AV Zadorojnyi, The Classical Quarterly, 2007年

classicalstudies.org

Brenk, Frederick (January 2016). “Pagan Monotheism and Pagan Cult”. "Theism" and Related Categories in the Study of Ancient Religions. SCS/AIA Annual Meeting. 75.4. Philadelphia: Society for Classical Studies (University of Pennsylvania). オリジナルの6 May 2017時点におけるアーカイブ。 3 August 2021閲覧. "Historical authors generally refer to “the divine” (to theion) or “the supernatural” (to daimonion) rather than simply “God.” [...] The Stoics, believed in a God identifiable with the logos or hegemonikon (reason or leading principle) of the universe and downgraded the traditional gods, who even disappear during the conflagration (ekpyrosis). Yet, the Stoics apparently did not practice a cult to this God. Middle and Later Platonists, who spoke of a supreme God, in philosophical discourse, generally speak of this God, not the gods, as responsible for the creation and providence of the universe. They, too, however, do not seem to have directly practiced a religious cult to their God."

doi.org

Mac Suibhne, S. (2009). “'Wrestle to be the man philosophy wished to make you': Marcus Aurelius, reflective practitioner”. Reflective Practice 10 (4): 429–436. doi:10.1080/14623940903138266.

etymonline.com

Harper, Douglas (2001年11月). “Online Etymology Dictionary — Stoic”. 2006年9月2日閲覧。

google.co.uk

books.google.co.uk

merriam-webster.com

“Passion”. Merriam-Webster. Encyclopædia Britannica. January 29, 2011閲覧。

newadvent.org

“On the Duties of the Clergy”. www.newadvent.org. 2017年3月1日閲覧。

routledge.com

rep.routledge.com

David, Sedley (1998). "Ancient philosophy". In E. Craig (ed.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008年10月18日閲覧。

samreligions.org

Brenk, Frederick (January 2016). “Pagan Monotheism and Pagan Cult”. "Theism" and Related Categories in the Study of Ancient Religions. SCS/AIA Annual Meeting. 75.4. Philadelphia: Society for Classical Studies (University of Pennsylvania). オリジナルの6 May 2017時点におけるアーカイブ。 3 August 2021閲覧. "Historical authors generally refer to “the divine” (to theion) or “the supernatural” (to daimonion) rather than simply “God.” [...] The Stoics, believed in a God identifiable with the logos or hegemonikon (reason or leading principle) of the universe and downgraded the traditional gods, who even disappear during the conflagration (ekpyrosis). Yet, the Stoics apparently did not practice a cult to this God. Middle and Later Platonists, who spoke of a supreme God, in philosophical discourse, generally speak of this God, not the gods, as responsible for the creation and providence of the universe. They, too, however, do not seem to have directly practiced a religious cult to their God."

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Stoicism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[1] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Susanne Bobzien, Ancient Logic
[2] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Susanne Bobzien, Ancient Logic
Baltzly, Dirk (2004年12月13日). “Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Stoicism”. 2006年9月2日閲覧。

web.archive.org

Brenk, Frederick (January 2016). “Pagan Monotheism and Pagan Cult”. "Theism" and Related Categories in the Study of Ancient Religions. SCS/AIA Annual Meeting. 75.4. Philadelphia: Society for Classical Studies (University of Pennsylvania). オリジナルの6 May 2017時点におけるアーカイブ。 3 August 2021閲覧. "Historical authors generally refer to “the divine” (to theion) or “the supernatural” (to daimonion) rather than simply “God.” [...] The Stoics, believed in a God identifiable with the logos or hegemonikon (reason or leading principle) of the universe and downgraded the traditional gods, who even disappear during the conflagration (ekpyrosis). Yet, the Stoics apparently did not practice a cult to this God. Middle and Later Platonists, who spoke of a supreme God, in philosophical discourse, generally speak of this God, not the gods, as responsible for the creation and providence of the universe. They, too, however, do not seem to have directly practiced a religious cult to their God."

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

Seneca, Moral letters to Lucilius, Letter 47: On master and slave, 10, circa 65 AD.

worldcat.org

Amos, H. (1982). These Were the Greeks. Chester Springs: Dufour Editions. ISBN 978-0-8023-1275-4. OCLC 9048254
Graver, Margaret (2009). Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-30558-5. OCLC 430497127
Seddon, Keith (2005). Epictetus' Handbook and the Tablet of Cebes. New York: Routledge. p. 217. ISBN 978-0-415-32451-9. OCLC 469313282