Knol (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Knol" in Japanese language version.

Last modified: 06:15:08, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank Japanese rank

61googleblog.blogspot.com

6,935^th place

6,684^th place

32bloomberg.com

118^th place

448^th place

31thetimes.com

221^st place

4,899^th place

21searchengineland.com

low place

21newsfactor.com

low place

21forbes.com

71^st place

259^th place

21nytimes.com

7^th place

51^st place

11telegraph.co.uk

40^th place

195^th place

11bbc.co.uk

11^th place

72^nd place

11google.com

109^th place

457^th place

11impress.co.jp

543^rd place

39^th place

11kotobank.jp

178^th place

14^th place

11news.com

low place

11theguardian.com

16^th place

81^st place

11techcrunch.com

317^th place

483^rd place

11techdirt.com

low place

11salon.com

683^rd place

1,879^th place

11svextra.com

low place

11dailytech.com

low place

11wired.com

254^th place

577^th place

11roughtype.com

low place

11wsj.com

94^th place

231^st place

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11^th place; Japanese: 72^nd place)

news.bbc.co.uk

“Google debuts knowledge project”. BBC (2007年12月15日). 2007年12月15日閲覧。 “Many experts see the initiative as an attack on the widely used Wikipedia communal encyclopaedia.”

bloomberg.com (Global: 118^th place; Japanese: 448^th place)

Hof, Rob (2007年12月14日). “Google's Knol: No Wikipedia Killer”. Bloomberg Businessweek. 2007年12月14日閲覧。
Levy, Ari (2007年12月14日). “Google Starts Web Site Knol to Challenge Wikipedia”. Bloomberg. 2007年12月15日閲覧.^{[リンク切れ]}

dailytech.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Hansson, Wolfgang (2007年12月14日). “Google Announces Knol Wikipedia-like Service”. DailyTech. 2007年12月14日閲覧.^{[リンク切れ]}

forbes.com (Global: 71^st place; Japanese: 259^th place)

Greenberg, Andy (2007年12月14日). “Google's Know-It-All Project”. Forbes. 2007年12月16日閲覧.

google.com (Global: 109^th place; Japanese: 457^th place)

https://www.google.com/help/knol_screenshot.html^{[リンク切れ]} 写真の女性はRachel Manber。ただしランク付けやレビューはサンプル。

googleblog.blogspot.com (Global: 6,935^th place; Japanese: 6,684^th place)

Manber, Ubi (2007年12月13日). “Encouraging people to contribute knowledge”. Google. 2008年12月7日閲覧。 “Earlier this week, we started inviting a selected group of people to try a new, free tool that we are calling "knol", which stands for a unit of knowledge. Our goal is to encourage people who know a particular subject to write an authoritative article about it.”

impress.co.jp (Global: 543^rd place; Japanese: 39^th place)

internet.watch.impress.co.jp

三柳英樹 (2011年11月24日). “米Google、「Knol」など7つのプロジェクトの終了を発表”. INTERNET watch. 株式会社インプレス. 2025年11月11日閲覧。

kotobank.jp (Global: 178^th place; Japanese: 14^th place)

「ノール」『デジタル大辞泉』小学館。コトバンクより2024年12月1日閲覧。

news.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Needleman, Rafe (2007年12月14日). “Google's Knol experiment to rival Wikipedia?”. CNET Networks. 2007年12月18日閲覧. Since Knol pages will be authored, users won't, presumably, be able to dive in and edit another page. They'll be able to submit edits to the author for approval, though.^{[リンク切れ]}

newsfactor.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Frederick, Lane (2007年12月14日). “Death Knell Sounds for Wikipedia, About.com”. NewsFactor Network. 2007年12月14日閲覧.^{[リンク切れ]}

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; Japanese: 51^st place)

Helft, Miguel (2007年12月15日). “Wikipedia Competitor Being Tested by Google”. New York Times. 2007年12月15日閲覧. Some critics said that shift could compromise Google’s objectivity in presenting search results.

roughtype.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Carr, Nicholas (2007年12月13日). “Google Knol takes aim at Wikipedia”. 2007年12月14日閲覧。

salon.com (Global: 683^rd place; Japanese: 1,879^th place)

Manjoo, Farhad (2007年12月14日). “Truthiness showdown: Google's "Knol" vs. Wikipedia”. Salon.com. 2007年12月14日閲覧。

searchengineland.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Sullivan, Danny (2007年12月13日). “Google Knol - Google's Play To Aggregate Knowledge Pages”. Search Engine Land. 2007年12月17日閲覧。 “Google Knol is designed to allow anyone to create a page on any topic, which others can comment on, rate, and contribute to if the primary author allows. [...] Google also stressed to me [...] that the service might not launch at all.”

svextra.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Murrell, John (2007年12月14日). “Google’s philosophy: Knol thyself”. SiliconValley.com. 2007年12月14日閲覧。^{[リンク切れ]}

techcrunch.com (Global: 317^th place; Japanese: 483^rd place)

Riley, Duncan (2007年12月14日). “Google Knol: A Step Too Far?”. TechCrunch. 2007年12月14日閲覧。

techdirt.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Masnick, Mike (2007年12月14日). “Google Decides Organizing The World's Information Is Easier If That Info Is Online”. techdirt. 2007年12月14日閲覧。

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 40^th place; Japanese: 195^th place)

Monaghan, Angela (2007年12月14日). “"Google's 'knol' may challenge Wikipedia”. The Daily Telegraph. 2007年12月15日閲覧。

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; Japanese: 81^st place)

Schofield, Jack [英語版] (2007年12月15日). “Google tries Knol, an encyclopedia to replace Wikipedia”. The Guardian. 2007年12月15日閲覧.{{cite news}}: CS1メンテナンス: url-status (カテゴリ)

thetimes.com (Global: 221^st place; Japanese: 4,899^th place)

Blakely, Rhys (2007年12月15日). “Google to tackle Wikipedia with new knowledge service”. The Times. 2007年12月15日閲覧。 “[K]nol looks set to foster rivalry. Contributors to knolwill not be able to contribute anonymously and will not be able to edit each other’s work, [...]. Whereas on Wikipedia, readers find only one entry on, say, the First World War, on knol authors will submit separate pieces that will compete for advertising dollars.”

wired.com (Global: 254^th place; Japanese: 577^th place)

Schiffman, Betsy (2007年12月14日). “Google's Units of Knowledge May Raise Conflict of Interest”. Wired. 2007年12月15日閲覧。

wsj.com (Global: 94^th place; Japanese: 231^st place)

online.wsj.com

Scott Morrison, "Google Targets Wikipedia With New 'Knol' Pages", Wall Street Journal, December 14, 2007

Knol (Japanese Wikipedia)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; Japanese: 72nd place)

news.bbc.co.uk

bloomberg.com (Global: 118th place; Japanese: 448th place)

dailytech.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

forbes.com (Global: 71st place; Japanese: 259th place)

google.com (Global: 109th place; Japanese: 457th place)

googleblog.blogspot.com (Global: 6,935th place; Japanese: 6,684th place)

impress.co.jp (Global: 543rd place; Japanese: 39th place)

internet.watch.impress.co.jp

kotobank.jp (Global: 178th place; Japanese: 14th place)

news.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

newsfactor.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Japanese: 51st place)

roughtype.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

salon.com (Global: 683rd place; Japanese: 1,879th place)

searchengineland.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

svextra.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

techcrunch.com (Global: 317th place; Japanese: 483rd place)

techdirt.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 40th place; Japanese: 195th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16th place; Japanese: 81st place)

thetimes.com (Global: 221st place; Japanese: 4,899th place)

wired.com (Global: 254th place; Japanese: 577th place)

wsj.com (Global: 94th place; Japanese: 231st place)

online.wsj.com

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11^th place; Japanese: 72^nd place)

bloomberg.com (Global: 118^th place; Japanese: 448^th place)

forbes.com (Global: 71^st place; Japanese: 259^th place)

google.com (Global: 109^th place; Japanese: 457^th place)

googleblog.blogspot.com (Global: 6,935^th place; Japanese: 6,684^th place)

impress.co.jp (Global: 543^rd place; Japanese: 39^th place)

kotobank.jp (Global: 178^th place; Japanese: 14^th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; Japanese: 51^st place)

salon.com (Global: 683^rd place; Japanese: 1,879^th place)

techcrunch.com (Global: 317^th place; Japanese: 483^rd place)

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 40^th place; Japanese: 195^th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; Japanese: 81^st place)

thetimes.com (Global: 221^st place; Japanese: 4,899^th place)

wired.com (Global: 254^th place; Japanese: 577^th place)

wsj.com (Global: 94^th place; Japanese: 231^st place)