Transmission Control Protocol (Japanese Wikipedia)

"Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) ... TCP provides a reliable, in-order, byte-stream service to applications. ... TCP is connection oriented" RFC 9293.
"TCP uses port numbers to identify application services and to multiplex distinct flows between hosts." RFC 9293.
"The application byte-stream is conveyed over the network via TCP segments" RFC 9293.
"a TCP segment is the unit of data transferred between a pair of TCP modules." RFC 9293.
RFC 791 - section 2.1
RFC 793
RFC 793 section 3.1
RFC 1323, TCP Extensions for High Performance, Section 2.2
RFC 2018, TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options, Section 2
RFC 2018, TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options, Section 3
RFC 1323, TCP Extensions for High Performance, Section 3.2
RFC 1146, TCP Alternate Checksum Options
RFC 793 Section 3.2
Postel, J. (November 1983). “3. The TCP Maximum Segment Size Option”. The TCP Maximum Segment Size and Related Topics (英語). IETF. sec. 3. doi:10.17487/RFC0879. RFC 879. 2024年9月2日閲覧. The MSS can be used completely independently in each direction of data flow. The result may be quite different maximum sizes in the two directions.
Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
the TCP provides a set of addresses or ports within each host. [rfc:793 RFC 793 - TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL]
"Glossary ... socket ... An address that specifically includes a port identifier, that is, the concatenation of an Internet Address with a TCP port." RFC 9293.
To allow for many processes within a single Host to use TCP communication facilities simultaneously, the TCP provides a set of addresses or ports within each host. [rfc:793 RFC 793 - TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL]
To identify the separate data streams that a TCP may handle, the TCP provides a port identifier. [rfc:793 RFC 793 - TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL]
Since a process may need to distinguish among several communication streams between itself and another process (or processes), we imagine that each process may have a number of ports through which it communicates with the ports of other processes. [rfc:793 RFC 793 - TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL]
uniquely allocating a group of ports to a given process [rfc:793 RFC 793 - TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL]
"Glossary ... connection A logical communication path identified by a pair of sockets." RFC 9293.
RFC 6182 Architectural Guidelines for Multipath TCP Development
RFC 8684 TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses

linfo.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

“TCP Definition”. 2011年3月12日閲覧。

linktionary.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

TCP (Linktionary term)

lwn.net (Global: 4,372^nd place; Japanese: 4,370^th place)

TCP window scaling and broken routers lwn.net

microsoft.com (Global: 263^rd place; Japanese: 228^th place)

academic.research.microsoft.com

“TCP performance over CDMA2000 RLP”. 2010年8月30日閲覧。

phrack.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

Exploiting TCP and the Persist Timer Infiniteness

ucl.ac.be (Global: 7,277^th place; Japanese: low place)

inl.info.ucl.ac.be

mptcp.info.ucl.ac.be

MultiPath TCP - Linux Kernel implementation

usenix.org (Global: 7,359^th place; Japanese: 9,237^th place)

Laurent Joncheray, Simple Active Attack Against TCP, 1995

ut.ac.ir (Global: 6,073^rd place; Japanese: low place)

ece.ut.ac.ir

Vinton G. Cerf, Robert E. Kahn, (May 1974). “A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication”. IEEE Transactions on Communications 22 (5): 637-648. オリジナルの2012-05-17時点におけるアーカイブ。.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Japanese: 1^st place)

Vinton G. Cerf, Robert E. Kahn, (May 1974). “A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication”. IEEE Transactions on Communications 22 (5): 637-648. オリジナルの2012-05-17時点におけるアーカイブ。.

Transmission Control Protocol (Japanese Wikipedia)

acm.org (Global: 1,200th place; Japanese: 1,842nd place)

dl.acm.org

portal.acm.org

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Japanese: 40th place)

cgisecurity.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

computer.org (Global: 6,549th place; Japanese: 9,300th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Japanese: 3rd place)

gont.com.ar (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

ietf.org (Global: 731st place; Japanese: 1,084th place)

datatracker.ietf.org

linfo.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

linktionary.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

lwn.net (Global: 4,372nd place; Japanese: 4,370th place)

microsoft.com (Global: 263rd place; Japanese: 228th place)

academic.research.microsoft.com

phrack.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

ucl.ac.be (Global: 7,277th place; Japanese: low place)

inl.info.ucl.ac.be

mptcp.info.ucl.ac.be

usenix.org (Global: 7,359th place; Japanese: 9,237th place)

ut.ac.ir (Global: 6,073rd place; Japanese: low place)

ece.ut.ac.ir

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Japanese: 1st place)

acm.org (Global: 1,200^th place; Japanese: 1,842^nd place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Japanese: 40^th place)

computer.org (Global: 6,549^th place; Japanese: 9,300^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Japanese: 3^rd place)

ietf.org (Global: 731^st place; Japanese: 1,084^th place)

lwn.net (Global: 4,372^nd place; Japanese: 4,370^th place)

microsoft.com (Global: 263^rd place; Japanese: 228^th place)

ucl.ac.be (Global: 7,277^th place; Japanese: low place)

usenix.org (Global: 7,359^th place; Japanese: 9,237^th place)

ut.ac.ir (Global: 6,073^rd place; Japanese: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Japanese: 1^st place)