"After the German occupation in 1941-44, Estonia remained occupied by the Soviet Union until the restoration of its independence in 1991." [1](European Court of Human Rights 17 January 2006)
Van Elsuwege, P. (2003). “State Continuity and its Consequences: The Case of the Baltic States”. Leiden Journal of International Law16: 377–388. doi:10.1017/S0922156503001195.
Malksoo, Lauri (2005). “Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR”. The American Journal of International Law99 (3): 734–736. doi:10.2307/1602324.
see, for instance, “Concurrent Resolution of the House and Senate: H. CON. RES. 128” (PDF) (2005年7月25日). 2006年12月9日閲覧。 “[e]xpressing the sense of Congress that the Government of the Russian Federation should issue a clear and unambiguous statement of admission and condemnation of the illegal occupation and annexation by the Soviet Union from 1940 to 1991 of the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.”
gwu.edu
Interview with Gerald Ford, August 4, 1997—"You have to recognize that the terms of that agreement said those boundaries have to be maintained peacefully. In other words, the Helsinki accords ruled out military action to change those borders. Now as long as those borders were re-defined peacefully, that was okay under the Helsinki Accords. Well what happened when you had the human rights provisions, and the dissidents rose up against their dictators, they changed those borders the Baltic nations and even Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary, they took advantage of the human rights provision, to re-define what the borders meant."
"After the German occupation in 1941-44, Estonia remained occupied by the Soviet Union until the restoration of its independence in 1991." [1](European Court of Human Rights 17 January 2006)
Juda, Lawrence (1975). “United States' nonrecognition of the Soviet Union's annexation of the Baltic States: Politics and law”. en:Journal of Baltic Studies6 (4): 272–290.
