“Niels Bohr – Session V”. Oral History Interviews. American Institute of Physics (2015年1月5日). 2022年4月7日閲覧。 “I felt that philosophers were very odd people who really were lost, because they have not the instinct that it is important to learn something and that we must be prepared really to learn something of very great importance. There are all kinds of people, but I think it would be reasonable to say that no man who is called a philosopher really understands what one means by the complementary description.”
arxiv.org
Schreiber, Zvi (16 January 1995). “The Nine Lives of Schroedinger's Cat” (英語). arXiv:quant-ph/9501014.
Schlosshauer, M.; Koer, J.; Zeilinger, A. (2013). “A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics44 (3): 222–230. arXiv:1301.1069. Bibcode: 2013SHPMP..44..222S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004.
Schlosshauer, M.; Koer, J.; Zeilinger, A. (2013). “A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics44 (3): 222–230. arXiv:1301.1069. Bibcode: 2013SHPMP..44..222S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004.
Pauli, Wolfgang (1954). “Naturwissenschaftliche und erkenntnistheoretische Aspekte der Ideen vom Unbewussten”. Dialectica8 (4): 283–301. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1954.tb01265.x. as translated in Harald Atmanspacher and Hans Primas, Journal of Consciousness Studies 13(3), 5-50 (2006): "Pauli's ideas on mind and matter in the context of contemporary science": "Once the physical observer has chosen his experimental arrangement, he has no further influence on the result which is objectively registered and generally accessible. Subjective properties of the observer or his psychological state are as irrelevant in the quantum mechanical laws of nature as in classical physics."
Bohr, Niels (1928). “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory”. Nature121 (3050): 580–590. Bibcode: 1928Natur.121..580B. doi:10.1038/121580a0. ": "[T]he quantum postulate implies that any observation of atomic phenomena will involve an interaction with the agency of observation not to be neglected. Accordingly, an independent reality in the ordinary physical sense can neither be ascribed to the phenomena nor to the agencies of observation. After all, the concept of observation is in so far arbitrary as it depends upon which objects are included in the system to be observed. Ultimately, every observation can, of course, be reduced to our sense perceptions. The circumstance, however, that in interpreting observations use has always to be made of theoretical notions entails that for every particular case it is a question of convenience at which point the concept of observation involving the quantum postulate with its inherent "irrationality" is brought in."
Schlosshauer, M.; Koer, J.; Zeilinger, A. (2013). “A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics44 (3): 222–230. arXiv:1301.1069. Bibcode: 2013SHPMP..44..222S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004.
Bohr, Niels (1928). “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory”. Nature121 (3050): 580–590. Bibcode: 1928Natur.121..580B. doi:10.1038/121580a0. ": "[T]he quantum postulate implies that any observation of atomic phenomena will involve an interaction with the agency of observation not to be neglected. Accordingly, an independent reality in the ordinary physical sense can neither be ascribed to the phenomena nor to the agencies of observation. After all, the concept of observation is in so far arbitrary as it depends upon which objects are included in the system to be observed. Ultimately, every observation can, of course, be reduced to our sense perceptions. The circumstance, however, that in interpreting observations use has always to be made of theoretical notions entails that for every particular case it is a question of convenience at which point the concept of observation involving the quantum postulate with its inherent "irrationality" is brought in."