功利主義 (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "功利主義" in Japanese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Japanese rank

22doi.org

2^nd place

6^th place

12jstor.org

26^th place

275^th place

12wikipedia.org

low place

7archive.org

6^th place

146^th place

6stanford.edu

179^th place

608^th place

5worldcat.org

5^th place

19^th place

5newadvent.org

471^st place

1,709^th place

5philpapers.org

1,865^th place

low place

4handle.net

102^nd place

78^th place

4nii.ac.jp

304^th place

20^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

2britannica.com

40^th place

156^th place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

61^st place

2semanticscholar.org

11^th place

1,537^th place

2philosophynow.org

low place

2utexas.edu

916^th place

2,207^th place

2wikisource.org

27^th place

80^th place

1proquest.com

206^th place

3,819^th place

1tandfonline.com

507^th place

1,847^th place

1centerforinquiry.org

low place

1utilitarianism.com

low place

1mac.com

6,812^th place

5,580^th place

1andphilosophy.com

low place

1upenn.edu

702^nd place

2,232^nd place

1gutenberg.org

489^th place

1,367^th place

1vatican.va

281^st place

1,538^th place

1utm.edu

1,379^th place

2,468^th place

1ed.ac.uk

1,871^st place

2,715^th place

1animal-rights-library.com

low place

1wesleyan.edu

7,995^th place

low place

1lancaster.ac.uk

low place

1utilitarianism.net

low place

1bbc.co.uk

8^th place

73^rd place

1ted.com

2,327^th place

3,345^th place

andphilosophy.com

Chandler Brett (2014年7月16日). “24 and Philosophy”. Blackwell. 2019年12月27日閲覧。

animal-rights-library.com

Mill, J. S.. “Whewell on Moral Philosophy”. Collected Works 10: 185–87.

archive.org

Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point. Oxford New York: Clarendon Press Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-824660-2
シンガー, ピーター (1979). Practical ethics (1st ed.). Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29720-2 :シンガー, ピーター (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43971-8
ブラント, リチャード B. (1979). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-824550-6
Smart, J. J. C.; Williams, Bernard (January 1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42. ISBN 978-0-521-09822-9
Paley, William (1785年). “The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy”. 2012年7月1日閲覧。
Smart, J. J. C.; Williams, Bernard (January 1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press. pp. 27–28. ISBN 978-0-521-09822-9
Parfit, Derek (January 1986). Reasons and Persons. Oxford Paperbacks. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-19-824908-5

bbc.co.uk

“Ethics - Lying”. BBC (1970年1月1日). 2022年6月30日閲覧。

books.google.com

britannica.com

Duignan, Brian. [1999] 2000. "Utilitarianism" (revised). Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
“Utilitarianism” (英語). Encyclopedia Britannica. 2020年12月29日閲覧。

centerforinquiry.org

“The Dostoevsky Dilemma for Religious Ethics | Center for Inquiry” (2011年2月15日). 2023年5月26日閲覧。

doi.org

Habibi, Don (2001). “Chapter 3, Mill’s Moral Philosophy”. John Stuart Mill and the Ethic of Human Growth. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 89–90, 112. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2010-6_3. ISBN 978-90-481-5668-9
深貝保則「永井義雄『イギリス近代社会思想史研究』未来社, 1996, 299+ixp.」『経済学史学会年報』第35巻第35号、経済学史学会、1997年、171-173頁、doi:10.11498/jshet1963.35.171、ISSN 0453-4786、NAID 130004246210。
Smith, Wilson (July 1954). “William Paley’s Theological Utilitarianism in America”. William and Mary Quarterly. 3rd Series 11 (3): 402–24. doi:10.2307/1943313. JSTOR 1943313.
Hauskeller, Michael (2011). “No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures”. Utilitas 23 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1017/S0953820811000264. hdl:10871/9381.
Saunders, Ben. 2010. "J. S. Mill’s Conception of Utility." Utilitas（英語版） 22(1):52–69. doi:10.1017/S0953820809990380. ProQuest 200183451.
Popkin, Richard H. (1950). “A Note on the ‘Proof’ of Utility in J. S. Mill”. Ethics 61: 66–68. doi:10.1086/290751.
Hall, Everett W. (1949). “The ‘Proof’ of Utility in Bentham and Mill”. Ethics 60: 1–18. doi:10.1086/290691.
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”. Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25): 344–54. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786.
McCloskey, H. J. (October 1957). “An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism”. Philosophical Review 66 (4): 466–85. doi:10.2307/2182745. JSTOR 2182745.
Urmson, J. O. (1953). “The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill”. Philosophical Quarterly 3 (10): 33–39. doi:10.2307/2216697. JSTOR 2216697.
Hare, R. M. (1972–1973). “The Presidential Address: Principles”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series 73: 1–18. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/73.1.1. JSTOR 4544830.
Smart, R.N. (October 1958). “Negative Utilitarianism”. Mind 67 (268): 542–43. doi:10.1093/mind/lxvii.268.542. JSTOR 2251207.
Knutsson, Simon (2021-11-26). “The world destruction argument” (英語). Inquiry 64 (10): 1004–1023. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658631. ISSN 0020-174X.
Feldman, Fred (May 1993). “On the Consistency of Act- and Motive-Utilitarianism: A Reply to Robert Adams”. Philosophical Studies 70 (2): 211–12. doi:10.1007/BF00989590.
Slote, Michael (1984). “Satisficing Consequentialism”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58: 139–176. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/58.1.139. JSTOR 4106846.
GANDJOUR, Afschin (30 June 2007). “Is it Rational to Pursue Utilitarianism?”. Ethical Perspectives 14 (2): 139–158. doi:10.2143/EP.14.2.2023965.
Harsanyi, John C. (June 1975). “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory A Theory of Justice by John Rawls”. American Political Science Review 69 (2): 594–606. doi:10.2307/1959090. JSTOR 1959090.
Norcross, Alastair (2009). “Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons”. Social Philosophy and Policy 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. オリジナルの27 November 2009時点におけるアーカイブ。 2012年6月29日閲覧。.
Mill, John Stuart (1981). “Comments upon James Mill’s Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind”. In Robson, John. Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6 and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). “Mill’s Intentions and Motives”. Utilitas 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b.
Dancy, Jonathan (2000). “Mill’s Puzzling Footnote”. Utilitas 12 (2): 219–22. doi:10.1017/S095382080000279X.
Cowen, T. (2003). c. Hargrove, Eugene. ed. “Policing Nature”. Environmental Ethics 25 (2): 169–182. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200325231.
N. Gregory Mankiw; Matthew Weinzierl (2010). “The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2 (1): 155–176. doi:10.1257/pol.2.1.155. JSTOR 25760055.

ed.ac.uk

pure.ed.ac.uk

Mill, John Stuart (1981). “Comments upon James Mill’s Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind”. In Robson, John. Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6 and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). “Mill’s Intentions and Motives”. Utilitas 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b.

gutenberg.org

Carlyle, Thomas (1841). “Lecture II. The Hero as Prophet. Mahomet: Islam.”. 英雄崇拝論（英語版）

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

小林武「清末におけるutilityと功利観」『京都産業大学論集人文科学系列』第41巻、京都産業大学、2010年3月、52–76頁、ISSN 02879727、NAID 110007523043。
佐藤豊「清末の功利主義受容に関連して見たところの前近代における功利概念」『愛知教育大学研究報告人文・社会科学編』第51巻、愛知教育大学、2002年3月、9–17頁、ISSN 13414615、NAID 110000576102。
Hauskeller, Michael (2011). “No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures”. Utilitas 23 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1017/S0953820811000264. hdl:10871/9381.
Mill, John Stuart (1981). “Comments upon James Mill’s Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind”. In Robson, John. Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6 and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). “Mill’s Intentions and Motives”. Utilitas 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b.

jstor.org

Smith, Wilson (July 1954). “William Paley’s Theological Utilitarianism in America”. William and Mary Quarterly. 3rd Series 11 (3): 402–24. doi:10.2307/1943313. JSTOR 1943313.
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”. Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25): 344–54. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786.
McCloskey, H. J. (October 1957). “An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism”. Philosophical Review 66 (4): 466–85. doi:10.2307/2182745. JSTOR 2182745.
Urmson, J. O. (1953). “The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill”. Philosophical Quarterly 3 (10): 33–39. doi:10.2307/2216697. JSTOR 2216697.
Hare, R. M. (1972–1973). “The Presidential Address: Principles”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series 73: 1–18. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/73.1.1. JSTOR 4544830.
ハルサーニ, ジョン・C. 1977. "Morality and the theory of rational behavior." Social Research（英語版） 44 (4):623–56. JSTOR 40971169.
Smart, R.N. (October 1958). “Negative Utilitarianism”. Mind 67 (268): 542–43. doi:10.1093/mind/lxvii.268.542. JSTOR 2251207.
Kagan, Shelly (1984). “Does Consequentialism Demand too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation”. Philosophy & Public Affairs（英語版） 13 (3): 239–54. JSTOR 2265413.
Slote, Michael (1984). “Satisficing Consequentialism”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58: 139–176. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/58.1.139. JSTOR 4106846.
Kagan, Shelly (Summer 1984). “Does Consequentialism Demand too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation”. Philosophy & Public Affairs 13 (3): 239–254. JSTOR 2265413.
Harsanyi, John C. (June 1975). “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory A Theory of Justice by John Rawls”. American Political Science Review 69 (2): 594–606. doi:10.2307/1959090. JSTOR 1959090.
N. Gregory Mankiw; Matthew Weinzierl (2010). “The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2 (1): 155–176. doi:10.1257/pol.2.1.155. JSTOR 25760055.

lancaster.ac.uk

“Mill’s "On Nature"”. www.lancaster.ac.uk (1904年). 2015年8月9日閲覧。

mac.com

homepage.mac.com

Norcross, Alastair (2009). “Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons”. Social Philosophy and Policy 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. オリジナルの27 November 2009時点におけるアーカイブ。 2012年6月29日閲覧。.

newadvent.org

“SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Man’s last end (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 1)”. newadvent.org. 2023年5月26日閲覧。
“SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Things in which man’s happiness consists (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 2)”. newadvent.org. 2023年5月26日閲覧。
“SUMMA THEOLOGICA: What is happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 3)”. newadvent.org. 2023年5月26日閲覧。
“SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Things that are required for happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 4)”. newadvent.org. 2023年5月26日閲覧。
“SUMMA THEOLOGICA: The attainment of happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 5)”. newadvent.org. 2023年5月26日閲覧。

nii.ac.jp

ci.nii.ac.jp

小林武「清末におけるutilityと功利観」『京都産業大学論集人文科学系列』第41巻、京都産業大学、2010年3月、52–76頁、ISSN 02879727、NAID 110007523043。
小林武、佐藤豊『清末功利思想と日本』（第1版）研文出版、2011年。ISBN 9784876363193。 NCID BB05455199。
佐藤豊「清末の功利主義受容に関連して見たところの前近代における功利概念」『愛知教育大学研究報告人文・社会科学編』第51巻、愛知教育大学、2002年3月、9–17頁、ISSN 13414615、NAID 110000576102。
深貝保則「永井義雄『イギリス近代社会思想史研究』未来社, 1996, 299+ixp.」『経済学史学会年報』第35巻第35号、経済学史学会、1997年、171-173頁、doi:10.11498/jshet1963.35.171、ISSN 0453-4786、NAID 130004246210。

philosophynow.org

In Moral Laws of the Jungle (link to Philosophy Now magazine), Iain King argues: "The way I reconcile my interests with those of other people is not for all of us to pour everything we care about into a pot then see which of the combination of satisfied wants would generate the most happiness (benefit). If we did that, I could be completely outnumbered… No, the way we reconcile interests is through empathy. Empathy is one-to-one, since we only imagine ourselves in the mind of one other person at a time. Even when I empathise with ‘the people’ here… I am really imagining what it is like to be just one woman. I cannot imagine myself to be more than one person at a time, and neither can you." Link accessed 2014-01-29.
This quote is from Iain King’s article in issue 100 of Philosophy Now magazine, Moral Laws of the Jungle (link), accessed 29 January 2014.

philpapers.org

Craig, Edward (1996). “Sidgwick, Henry”. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. https://philpapers.org/rec/BEAREO
Honderich, Ted (2005). “Sidgwick, Henry”. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2
Borchert, Donald M. (2006). “Sidgwick, Henry”. Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan. https://philpapers.org/rec/MONMEO-3
Borchert, Donald M. (2006). “Sidgwick, Henry [Addendum”]. Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan. https://philpapers.org/rec/MONMEO-3
Ross, W. D. (2002). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/STRTRA-4

proquest.com

search.proquest.com

Saunders, Ben. 2010. "J. S. Mill’s Conception of Utility." Utilitas（英語版） 22(1):52–69. doi:10.1017/S0953820809990380. ProQuest 200183451.

semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

White, Stuart. [2004] 2015. "Social Minimum." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Stanford University. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
Goodman, Charles. 2016. "Śāntideva", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
Brink, David. [2007] 2018. "Mill Moral and Political Philosophy." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
“Henry Sidgwick”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2020年). 2020年12月29日閲覧。
Habib, Allen. [2008] 2014. "Promises." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Briggs, Rachael (2017), Edward N. Zalta, ed., Normative Theories of Rational Choice: Expected Utility (Spring 2017 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 2017年11月15日閲覧。

tandfonline.com

Knutsson, Simon (2021-11-26). “The world destruction argument” (英語). Inquiry 64 (10): 1004–1023. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658631. ISSN 0020-174X.

ted.com

Peter Singer: The why and how of effective altruism | Talk Video. TED.com.

upenn.edu

knarf.english.upenn.edu

“Godwin, "Political Justice," Book 2, Chap. 2”. 2023年5月26日閲覧。

utexas.edu

ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu

“Utilitarianism” (英語). Ethics Unwrapped. Austin, TX: McCombs School of Business. 2020年5月27日閲覧。

laits.utexas.edu

“ME Book 3 Chapter 14 Section 5”. www.laits.utexas.edu. 2021年5月13日閲覧。

utilitarianism.com

Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism, Chapter 2”. 2012年6月24日閲覧。

utilitarianism.net

“Acting on Utilitarianism” (英語). Introduction to Utilitarianism. 2021年2月11日閲覧。

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

“William David Ross”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2021年1月12日閲覧。

vatican.va

“Letter to Families”. 2011年4月5日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ。2011年4月1日閲覧。

web.archive.org

Norcross, Alastair (2009). “Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons”. Social Philosophy and Policy 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. オリジナルの27 November 2009時点におけるアーカイブ。 2012年6月29日閲覧。.
“Letter to Families”. 2011年4月5日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ。2011年4月1日閲覧。
Animal Liberation, Second Edition Archived 5 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine., Singer, Peter, 1975, 1990, excerpt, pp. 171–74, main passage on oysters, mussels, etc. p. 174 (last paragraph of this excerpt). And in a footnote in the actual book, Singer writes "My change of mind about mollusks stems from conversations with R.I. Sikora."

wesleyan.edu

Animal Liberation, Second Edition Archived 5 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine., Singer, Peter, 1975, 1990, excerpt, pp. 171–74, main passage on oysters, mussels, etc. p. 174 (last paragraph of this excerpt). And in a footnote in the actual book, Singer writes "My change of mind about mollusks stems from conversations with R.I. Sikora."

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Saunders, Ben. 2010. "J. S. Mill’s Conception of Utility." Utilitas（英語版） 22(1):52–69. doi:10.1017/S0953820809990380. ProQuest 200183451.
Bayles, M. D., ed. 1968. Contemporary Utilitarianism. Doubleday: Anchor Books（英語版）.
Lyons, David（英語版）. 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism.
ハルサーニ, ジョン・C. 1977. "Morality and the theory of rational behavior." Social Research（英語版） 44 (4):623–56. JSTOR 40971169.
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1976. "Motive Utilitarianism. The Journal of Philosophy（英語版） 73(14).
Kagan, Shelly (1984). “Does Consequentialism Demand too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation”. Philosophy & Public Affairs（英語版） 13 (3): 239–54. JSTOR 2265413.
Parfit, Derek. 1978. "Innumerate Ethics." Philosophy & Public Affairs（英語版） 7(4):285–301.
Kamm, Frances Myrna（英語版）. 1985. "Equal Treatment and Equal Chances." Philosophy & Public Affairs（英語版） 14(2):177–94.
Kavka, Gregory S.（英語版） 1979. "The Numbers Should Count", Philosophical Studies（英語版） 36(3):285–94.
Otsuka, Michael（英語版）. 2004. "Skepticism about Saving the Greater Number." Philosophy & Public Affairs（英語版） 32(4):413–26.
Lawlor, Rob. 2006. "Taurek, Numbers and Probabilities." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice（英語版） 9(2):149–66.
Carlyle, Thomas (1841). “Lecture II. The Hero as Prophet. Mahomet: Islam.”. 英雄崇拝論（英語版）

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Utilitarianism. n1.

ja.wikisource.org

Das Kapital Volume 1, Chapter 24, endnote 50

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

小林武「清末におけるutilityと功利観」『京都産業大学論集人文科学系列』第41巻、京都産業大学、2010年3月、52–76頁、ISSN 02879727、NAID 110007523043。
佐藤豊「清末の功利主義受容に関連して見たところの前近代における功利概念」『愛知教育大学研究報告人文・社会科学編』第51巻、愛知教育大学、2002年3月、9–17頁、ISSN 13414615、NAID 110000576102。
深貝保則「永井義雄『イギリス近代社会思想史研究』未来社, 1996, 299+ixp.」『経済学史学会年報』第35巻第35号、経済学史学会、1997年、171-173頁、doi:10.11498/jshet1963.35.171、ISSN 0453-4786、NAID 130004246210。
Knutsson, Simon (2019-08-29). “The world destruction argument”. Inquiry 64 (10): 1004–1023. ISSN 0020-174X.
Knutsson, Simon (2021-11-26). “The world destruction argument” (英語). Inquiry 64 (10): 1004–1023. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658631. ISSN 0020-174X.