Lakshmanan S; Prakash S (1980). “Human prepuce: some aspects of structure and function”. Indian Journal of Surgery44: 134–137. http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/lakshmanan/. "The outer layer of the prepuce in common with the skin of the shaft of the penis glides freely in a to and fro fashion and has to be delicate and thin, as was observed in this study. [...] The inner lining of the projecting tubular part has the structure of the outer layer and adds to the thin gliding skin when retracted."
Winkelmann RK (1957). “The mucocutaneous end-organ: the primary organized sensory ending in human skin”. AMA Arch Dermatol76 (2): 225–35. doi:10.1001/archderm.1957.01550200069015.
Schober JM, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Dolezal C (April 2009). “Self-ratings of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in men using the 'Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function, Male' questionnaire”. BJU Int.103 (8): 1096–103. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08166.x. PMID19245445.
Kigozi G, Watya S, Polis CB, et al. (January 2008). “The effect of male circumcision on sexual satisfaction and function, results from a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention, Rakai, Uganda”. BJU Int.101 (1): 65–70. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07369.x. PMID18086100. "Opponents of circumcision, using results from selected observational studies, have argued that the procedure impairs sexual function, and reduces sexual pleasure and satisfaction through keratinization of the glans, removal of the most sensitive preputial tissues, and loss of the 'gliding' mechanism provided by the foreskin"
Fakjian, N; S Hunter, GW Cole and J Miller (August 1990). “An argument for circumcision. Prevention of balanitis in the adult”. Arch Dermatol126 (8): 1046–7. doi:10.1001/archderm.126.8.1046. PMID2383029.
O'Farrell N, Quigley M, Fox P (2005). “Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study”. Int J STD AIDS16 (8): 556–9. doi:10.1258/0956462054679151. PMID16105191. "Overall, circumcised men were less likely to be diagnosed with a STI/balanitis (51% and 35%, P 1⁄4 0.021) than those non-circumcised"
Mallon E, Hawkins D, Dinneen M et al. (March 2000). “Circumcision and genital dermatoses”. Arch Dermatol136 (3): 350–4. doi:10.1001/archderm.136.3.350. PMID10724196.
Sörensen SM, Sörensen MR (1988). “Circumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-up”. Int Urol Nephrol20 (2): 159–66. doi:10.1007/BF02550667. PMID3384610.
Cathcart P, Nuttall M, van der Meulen J, Emberton M, Kenny SE (July 2006). “Trends in paediatric circumcision and its complications in England between 1997 and 2003”. Br J Surg93 (7): 885–90. doi:10.1002/bjs.5369. PMID16673355.
Simforoosh N, Tabibi A, Khalili SA, et al. (November 2010). “Neonatal circumcision reduces the incidence of asymptomatic urinary tract infection: A large prospective study with long-term follow up using Plastibell”. J Pediatr Urol. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.10.008. PMID21115400.
Yegane, R.A.; A.R. Kheirollahi, N.A. Salehi, M. Bashashati, J.A. Khoshdel and M. Ahmadi (May 2006). “Late complications of circumcision in Iran”. Pediatr Surg Int22 (5): 442–445. doi:10.1007/s00383-006-1672-1. PMID16649052.
Van Howe, R.S. (2006). “Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting”. Clin Pediatr (Phila)45 (1): 49–54. doi:10.1177/000992280604500108. PMID16429216.
Stenram A, Malmfors G, Okmian L (1986). “Circumcision for phimosis: a follow-up study”. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.20 (2): 89–92. doi:10.3109/00365598609040554. PMID3749823.
O'Farrell N, Quigley M, Fox P (2005). “Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study”. Int J STD AIDS16 (8): 556–9. doi:10.1258/0956462054679151. PMID16105191.
de Witte L, Nabatov A, Pion M, et al. (2007). “Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells”. Nat. Med.13 (3): 367–71. doi:10.1038/nm1541. PMID17334373.
Hovatta, O.; M. Mikkola1, K. Gertow, A.-M. Strömberg, J. Inzunza1, J. Hreinsson1, B. Rozell, E. Elisabeth Blennow, M. Andäng, L. Ährlund-Richter (July 2003). “A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells”. Human Reproduction18 (7): 1404–1409. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg290. PMID12832363.
Schober JM, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Dolezal C (April 2009). “Self-ratings of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in men using the 'Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function, Male' questionnaire”. BJU Int.103 (8): 1096–103. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08166.x. PMID19245445.
Kigozi G, Watya S, Polis CB, et al. (January 2008). “The effect of male circumcision on sexual satisfaction and function, results from a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention, Rakai, Uganda”. BJU Int.101 (1): 65–70. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07369.x. PMID18086100. "Opponents of circumcision, using results from selected observational studies, have argued that the procedure impairs sexual function, and reduces sexual pleasure and satisfaction through keratinization of the glans, removal of the most sensitive preputial tissues, and loss of the 'gliding' mechanism provided by the foreskin"
Fakjian, N; S Hunter, GW Cole and J Miller (August 1990). “An argument for circumcision. Prevention of balanitis in the adult”. Arch Dermatol126 (8): 1046–7. doi:10.1001/archderm.126.8.1046. PMID2383029.
O'Farrell N, Quigley M, Fox P (2005). “Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study”. Int J STD AIDS16 (8): 556–9. doi:10.1258/0956462054679151. PMID16105191. "Overall, circumcised men were less likely to be diagnosed with a STI/balanitis (51% and 35%, P 1⁄4 0.021) than those non-circumcised"
Mallon E, Hawkins D, Dinneen M et al. (March 2000). “Circumcision and genital dermatoses”. Arch Dermatol136 (3): 350–4. doi:10.1001/archderm.136.3.350. PMID10724196.
Sörensen SM, Sörensen MR (1988). “Circumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-up”. Int Urol Nephrol20 (2): 159–66. doi:10.1007/BF02550667. PMID3384610.
Cathcart P, Nuttall M, van der Meulen J, Emberton M, Kenny SE (July 2006). “Trends in paediatric circumcision and its complications in England between 1997 and 2003”. Br J Surg93 (7): 885–90. doi:10.1002/bjs.5369. PMID16673355.
Simforoosh N, Tabibi A, Khalili SA, et al. (November 2010). “Neonatal circumcision reduces the incidence of asymptomatic urinary tract infection: A large prospective study with long-term follow up using Plastibell”. J Pediatr Urol. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.10.008. PMID21115400.
Yegane, R.A.; A.R. Kheirollahi, N.A. Salehi, M. Bashashati, J.A. Khoshdel and M. Ahmadi (May 2006). “Late complications of circumcision in Iran”. Pediatr Surg Int22 (5): 442–445. doi:10.1007/s00383-006-1672-1. PMID16649052.
Griffiths, D.M; Atwell JD, Freeman NV (1985). “A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children”. Eur Urol11 (3): 184–7. PMID4029234.
Van Howe, R.S. (2006). “Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting”. Clin Pediatr (Phila)45 (1): 49–54. doi:10.1177/000992280604500108. PMID16429216.
Stenram A, Malmfors G, Okmian L (1986). “Circumcision for phimosis: a follow-up study”. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.20 (2): 89–92. doi:10.3109/00365598609040554. PMID3749823.
O'Farrell N, Quigley M, Fox P (2005). “Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study”. Int J STD AIDS16 (8): 556–9. doi:10.1258/0956462054679151. PMID16105191.
de Witte L, Nabatov A, Pion M, et al. (2007). “Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells”. Nat. Med.13 (3): 367–71. doi:10.1038/nm1541. PMID17334373.
Hovatta, O.; M. Mikkola1, K. Gertow, A.-M. Strömberg, J. Inzunza1, J. Hreinsson1, B. Rozell, E. Elisabeth Blennow, M. Andäng, L. Ährlund-Richter (July 2003). “A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells”. Human Reproduction18 (7): 1404–1409. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg290. PMID12832363.
“Male circumcision: Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability” (PDF). World Health Organization. pp. 16. 2012年4月29日閲覧。 “Although it has been argued that sexual function may diminish following circumcision due to the removal of the nerve endings in the foreskin and subsequent thickening of the epithelia of the glans, there is little evidence for this and studies are inconsistent.”