Taylor, Kathleen (2006-07-27). Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control. Oxford University Press (2006発行). p. 42. ISBN9780199204786. https://books.google.com/books?id=D3tYeMLc4hQC2013年11月17日閲覧. "[...] leaders often have beliefs which are very far from matching reality and which can become more extreme as they are encouraged by their followers. The predilection of many cult leaders for abstract, ambiguous, and therefore unchallengeable ideas can further reduce the likelihood of reality testing, while the intense milieu control exerted by cults over their members means that most of the reality available for testing is supplied by the group environment. This is seen in the phenomenon of 'groupthink', alleged to have occurred, notoriously, during the Bay of Pigs fiasco."
Turner, M.; Pratkanis, A. (1998). “A social identity maintenance model of groupthink”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2–3): 210–235. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2757. PMID9705803.
't Hart, P. (1998). “Preventing groupthink revisited: Evaluating and reforming groups in government”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2–3): 306–326. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2764. PMID9705806.
McCauley, C. (1989). “The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57 (2): 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.250.
Hart, Paul't (1991). “Irving L. Janis' "Victims of Groupthink"”. Political Psychology12 (2): 247–278. doi:10.2307/3791464. JSTOR3791464.
Flowers, M.L. (1977). “A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology35 (12): 888–896. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.12.888.
Schafer, M.; Crichlow, S. (1996). “Antecedents of groupthink: a quantitative study”. Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (3): 415–435. doi:10.1177/0022002796040003002.
Cline, R. J. W. (1990). “Detecting groupthink: Methods for observing the illusion of unanimity”. Communication Quarterly38 (2): 112–126. doi:10.1080/01463379009369748.
Manz, C. C.; Sims, H. P. (1982). “The potential for "groupthink" in autonomous work groups”. Human Relations35 (9): 773–784. doi:10.1177/001872678203500906.
Fodor, Eugene M.; Smith, Terry, Jan 1982, The power motive as an influence on group decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 42(1), 178–185. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.178
Callaway, Michael R.; Marriott, Richard G.; Esser, James K., Oct 1985, Effects of dominance on group decision making: Toward a stress-reduction explanation of groupthink, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 49(4), 949–952. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.949
Carrie, R. Leana (1985). A partial test of Janis' Groupthink Model: Effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making, "Journal of Management", vol. 11(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1177/014920638501100102
Raven, B. H. (1998). “Groupthink: Bay of Pigs and Watergate reconsidered”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 352–361. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2766. PMID9705808.
Hermann, A.; Rammal, H. G. (2010). “The grounding of the "flying bank"”. Management Decision48 (7): 1051. doi:10.1108/00251741011068761.
Eaton, Jack (2001). “Management communication: the threat of groupthink”. Corporate Communications6 (4): 183–192. doi:10.1108/13563280110409791.
Koerber, C. P.; Neck, C. P. (2003). “Groupthink and sports: An application of Whyte's model”. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management15: 20–28. doi:10.1108/09596110310458954.
Baron, R. (2005). “So right it's wrong: Groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37: 35. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37004-3. ISBN9780120152377.
Kramer, R. M. (1998). “Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam decisions 25 years later: How well has the groupthink hypothesis stood the test of time?”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 236–71. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2762. PMID9705804.
Choi, Jin Nam; Kim, Myung Un (1999). “The organizational application of groupthink and its limitations in organizations.”. Journal of Applied Psychology84 (2): 297–306. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.297. ISSN1939-1854. "Interestingly, several groupthink symptoms (i.e., group identity), such as the illusion of invulnerability, belief in inherent group morality, and illusion of unanimity, produced unexpected results: (a) negative correlations with concurrence seeking and defective decision making and (b) positive correlations with both internal and external team activities and with reported team performance."
Whyte, G. (1998). “Recasting Janis's Groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 185–209. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2761. PMID9705802.
McCauley, C. (1998). “Group dynamics in Janis's theory of groupthink: Backward and forward”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 142–162. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2759. PMID9705800.
Tsoukalas, I. (2007). “Exploring the microfoundations of group consciousness”. Culture and Psychology13 (1): 39–81. doi:10.1177/1354067x07073650.
Turner, M.; Pratkanis, A. (1998). “A social identity maintenance model of groupthink”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2–3): 210–235. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2757. PMID9705803.
't Hart, P. (1998). “Preventing groupthink revisited: Evaluating and reforming groups in government”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2–3): 306–326. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2764. PMID9705806.
Raven, B. H. (1998). “Groupthink: Bay of Pigs and Watergate reconsidered”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 352–361. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2766. PMID9705808.
Kramer, R. M. (1998). “Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam decisions 25 years later: How well has the groupthink hypothesis stood the test of time?”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 236–71. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2762. PMID9705804.
Whyte, G. (1998). “Recasting Janis's Groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 185–209. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2761. PMID9705802.
McCauley, C. (1998). “Group dynamics in Janis's theory of groupthink: Backward and forward”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes73 (2/3): 142–162. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2759. PMID9705800.
Choi, Jin Nam; Kim, Myung Un (1999). “The organizational application of groupthink and its limitations in organizations.”. Journal of Applied Psychology84 (2): 297–306. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.297. ISSN1939-1854. "Interestingly, several groupthink symptoms (i.e., group identity), such as the illusion of invulnerability, belief in inherent group morality, and illusion of unanimity, produced unexpected results: (a) negative correlations with concurrence seeking and defective decision making and (b) positive correlations with both internal and external team activities and with reported team performance."