非難 (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "非難" in Japanese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Japanese rank

4^th place

24^th place

974^th place

62^nd place

1,461^st place

93^rd place

178^th place

12^th place

3^rd place

61^st place

433^rd place

1,942^nd place

18^th place

107^th place

2^nd place

6^th place

books.google.com

Hoffman, Morris B. (2014). The Punisher's Brain: The Evolution of Judge and Jury. Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society. Cambridge University Press. p. 68. ISBN 9781107038066 2014年5月22日閲覧. "Our adult brains [...] have dedicated circuits devoted to the assessment of intentionality and harm, and to the calculation of blame based on those two assessments, using intent as the main driver and harm only as a tiebreaker. Part of those blaming circuits lie in a region called the temporoparietal junction, or TPJ. It is an area of the cortex roughly even with the top of the ears."

Ngo, Lawrence; Kelly, Meagan; Coutlee, Christopher G; Carter, R McKell; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; Huettel, Scott A (2015). “Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying Intentionality.”. Scientific Reports 5: 17390. Bibcode: 2015NatSR...517390N. doi:10.1038/srep17390. PMC 4669441. PMID 26634909. "Based on converging behavioral and neural evidence, we demonstrate that there is no single underlying mechanism. Instead, two distinct mechanisms together generate the asymmetry. Emotion drives ascriptions of intentionality for negative consequences, while the consideration of statistical norms leads to the denial of intentionality for positive consequences."

Ngo, Lawrence; Kelly, Meagan; Coutlee, Christopher G; Carter, R McKell; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; Huettel, Scott A (2015). “Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying Intentionality.”. Scientific Reports 5: 17390. Bibcode: 2015NatSR...517390N. doi:10.1038/srep17390. PMC 4669441. PMID 26634909. "Based on converging behavioral and neural evidence, we demonstrate that there is no single underlying mechanism. Instead, two distinct mechanisms together generate the asymmetry. Emotion drives ascriptions of intentionality for negative consequences, while the consideration of statistical norms leads to the denial of intentionality for positive consequences."

Ngo, Lawrence; Kelly, Meagan; Coutlee, Christopher G; Carter, R McKell; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; Huettel, Scott A (2015). “Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying Intentionality.”. Scientific Reports 5: 17390. Bibcode: 2015NatSR...517390N. doi:10.1038/srep17390. PMC 4669441. PMID 26634909. "Based on converging behavioral and neural evidence, we demonstrate that there is no single underlying mechanism. Instead, two distinct mechanisms together generate the asymmetry. Emotion drives ascriptions of intentionality for negative consequences, while the consideration of statistical norms leads to the denial of intentionality for positive consequences."

Ngo, Lawrence; Kelly, Meagan; Coutlee, Christopher G; Carter, R McKell; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; Huettel, Scott A (2015). “Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying Intentionality.”. Scientific Reports 5: 17390. Bibcode: 2015NatSR...517390N. doi:10.1038/srep17390. PMC 4669441. PMID 26634909. "Based on converging behavioral and neural evidence, we demonstrate that there is no single underlying mechanism. Instead, two distinct mechanisms together generate the asymmetry. Emotion drives ascriptions of intentionality for negative consequences, while the consideration of statistical norms leads to the denial of intentionality for positive consequences."