Bahr, Lindsey (February 3, 2016). “Review: 'Pride & Prejudice & Zombies' is a silly muddle”. Associated Press. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “This story might have been better suited to a television adaptation. The characters would have been allowed to breathe for a beat in that case. Here, the action and violence take up the space that would have generally been used for character development.”
Hassenger, Jesse (February 4, 2016). “Adding zombies to Pride And Prejudice isn’t inherently scary or funny”. A.V.クラブ（英語版）. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “That this particular retelling of the Jane Austen novel feels like a Cliffs Notes version is understandable; that its zombie bits are equally rudimentary, though, is more disappointing.”
Collis, Clark (February 4, 2016). “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: EW review”. Entertainment Weekly. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “f more inventive than scary, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies breathes fresh life into the hugely popular, but now desperately predictable, undead genre.”
Collis, Clark; Looser, Devoney (February 12, 2016). “The Ultimate Fan Face-Off”. Entertainment Weekly: p. 52. http://www.ew.com/article/2016/02/04/pride-prejudice-zombies2017年5月5日閲覧. "COLLIS: I enjoy genre movies that attempt something different — and this does — but I didn’t find it all that scary. I’d give it a B. / LOOSER: I laughed a lot and I shrieked. I was wavering between B+ and A–. I’m willing to bump it up for its originality and live with my grade-inflation reputation: A–"
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Community Development Project. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–" (英語). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. 2019年1月2日閲覧。
Whitty, Stephen (February 3, 2016). “Movie review: ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ is brainless”. Daily News. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “The hungry monsters in "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies" are looking for nice big brains. Well, they won't find any here. With its forced marriage between Jane Austen and George Romero, this is a story that has to be smart — and silly.”
Dargis, Manohla (February 4, 2016). “Review: ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’; More Tea, Dear?”. The New York Times. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “Both pride and prejudice still play their parts, but now in service to one tediously repeated joke: the sight of a gentleman or a lady, together or alone, playing cards or ballroom dancing, fatally swarmed by devouring zombies.”
Lemire, Christy (February 4, 2016). “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Movie Review (2016)”. RogerEbert.com. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “Like the novel “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies,” the movie “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” is predicated on a simple, single gimmick: It’s “Pride and Prejudice” … with zombies. This is a vaguely amusing idea which somehow got stretched out to an entire book, which somehow became a best seller, which inevitably means it had to be made into a film.”
O'Hara, Helen (11 February 2016). “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies review: 'glossy but tedious'”. The Daily Telegraph. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “If it had been more elegant in its storytelling, it could have been a fun genre crossover, but the best efforts of Steers and his cast can’t turn the overstuffed book into a film that makes any real sense.”
Kermode, Mark (11 February 2016). “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies review—horror hybrid lacks bite”. The Guardian. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “Yet torn between Austen and the undead, Steers seems unsure how straight to play either element, blunting comedy, horror and romance alike. The result lacks bite – the one element that zombies and Austen should have in common.”
Merry, Stephanie (February 4, 2016). “'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies': A mash-up that doesn’t mesh”. The Washington Post. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 ““Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” delivers what its title promises: a little romance and some undead villains, plus a bit of comedy. But this overly busy riff on Austen’s winning formula doesn’t justify all the tinkering.”
Hassenger, Jesse (February 4, 2016). “Adding zombies to Pride And Prejudice isn’t inherently scary or funny”. A.V.クラブ（英語版）. 2017年5月5日閲覧。 “That this particular retelling of the Jane Austen novel feels like a Cliffs Notes version is understandable; that its zombie bits are equally rudimentary, though, is more disappointing.”
