ჰოროსკოპი (Georgian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ჰოროსკოპი" in Georgian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Georgian rank
2nd place
7th place
11th place
148th place
40th place
22nd place
6th place
5th place
18th place
39th place
2,613th place
1,945th place
5th place
26th place
26th place
87th place
179th place
238th place
low place
1,742nd place
9,201st place
5,671st place
2,509th place
916th place
621st place
1,188th place
61st place
105th place

archive.org

astrosociety.org

britannica.com

doi.org

  • Thagard, Paul R. (1978). „Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience“ (PDF). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. The University of Chicago Press. 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. JSTOR 192639. S2CID 147050929.
  • Hartmann, P.; Reuter, M.; Nyborga, H. (May 2006). „The relationship between date of birth and individual differences in personality and general intelligence: A large-scale study“. Personality and Individual Differences. 40 (7): 1349–1362. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.017. ციტატა: „To optimise the chances of finding even remote relationships between date of birth and individual differences in personality and intelligence we further applied two different strategies. The first one was based on the common chronological concept of time (e.g. month of birth and season of birth). The second strategy was based on the (pseudo-scientific) concept of astrology (e.g. Sun Signs, The Elements, and astrological gender), as discussed in the book Astrology: Science or superstition? by Eysenck and Nias (1982).“
  • Carlson, Shawn (1985). „A double-blind test of astrology“ (PDF). Nature. 318 (6045): 419–425. Bibcode:1985Natur.318..419C. doi:10.1038/318419a0. S2CID 5135208.
  • Zarka, Philippe (2011). „Astronomy and astrology“. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 5 (S260): 420–425. Bibcode:2011IAUS..260..420Z. doi:10.1017/S1743921311002602.

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

jstor.org

  • Thagard, Paul R. (1978). „Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience“ (PDF). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. The University of Chicago Press. 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. JSTOR 192639. S2CID 147050929.

lbl.gov

muller.lbl.gov

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Thagard, Paul R. (1978). „Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience“ (PDF). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. The University of Chicago Press. 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. JSTOR 192639. S2CID 147050929.
  • Carlson, Shawn (1985). „A double-blind test of astrology“ (PDF). Nature. 318 (6045): 419–425. Bibcode:1985Natur.318..419C. doi:10.1038/318419a0. S2CID 5135208.

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Sven Ove Hansson, Edward N. Zalta. „Science and Pseudo-Science“. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ციტირების თარიღი: 6 July 2012.

time.com

uio.no

  • Thagard, Paul R. (1978). „Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience“ (PDF). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. The University of Chicago Press. 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. JSTOR 192639. S2CID 147050929.

uwi.edu

cavehill.uwi.edu

worldcat.org

  • Thagard, Paul R. (1978). „Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience“ (PDF). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. The University of Chicago Press. 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. JSTOR 192639. S2CID 147050929.

zenodo.org