GNU LibreDWG (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "GNU LibreDWG" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Korean rank
1,475th place
463rd place
1,669th place
653rd place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
383rd place
118th place
low place
low place

github.com

gnu.org

savannah.gnu.org

git.savannah.gnu.org

gnu.org

libregraphicsworld.org

  • Prokoudine, Alexandre (26 January 2012). “What's up with DWG adoption in free software?”. libregraphicsworld.org. 9 November 2016에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 3 November 2013에 확인함. GPLv3 license. It doesn't work for end-user software, because they tend to use 3rd party components under different licenses that impose restrictions. FSF who are sole copyright holders of LibreDWG objected to relicensing. With regards to FreeCAD project and Yorik van Havre, its contributor, Richard Stallman stated:" You should not change the license of your library. Rather, it is best to make it clear to him what the conditions are." [...] Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force (as GPL/GNU does) is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible. 
  • Prokoudine, Alexandre (26 January 2012). “What's up with DWG adoption in free software?”. libregraphicsworld.org. 9 November 2016에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 3 November 2013에 확인함. GPLv3 license. It doesn't work for end-user software, because they tend to use 3rd party components under different licenses that impose restrictions. FSF who are sole copyright holders of LibreDWG objected to relicensing. With regards to FreeCAD project and Yorik van Havre, its contributor, Richard Stallman stated:" You should not change the license of your library. Rather, it is best to make it clear to him what the conditions are." [...] Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force (as GPL/GNU does) is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible. 

sourceforge.io

libdwg.sourceforge.io

sourceforge.net

libdwg.sourceforge.net

sourceforge.net

web.archive.org

  • Prokoudine, Alexandre (26 January 2012). “What's up with DWG adoption in free software?”. libregraphicsworld.org. 9 November 2016에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 3 November 2013에 확인함. GPLv3 license. It doesn't work for end-user software, because they tend to use 3rd party components under different licenses that impose restrictions. FSF who are sole copyright holders of LibreDWG objected to relicensing. With regards to FreeCAD project and Yorik van Havre, its contributor, Richard Stallman stated:" You should not change the license of your library. Rather, it is best to make it clear to him what the conditions are." [...] Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force (as GPL/GNU does) is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible. 
  • Prokoudine, Alexandre (26 January 2012). “What's up with DWG adoption in free software?”. libregraphicsworld.org. 9 November 2016에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 3 November 2013에 확인함. GPLv3 license. It doesn't work for end-user software, because they tend to use 3rd party components under different licenses that impose restrictions. FSF who are sole copyright holders of LibreDWG objected to relicensing. With regards to FreeCAD project and Yorik van Havre, its contributor, Richard Stallman stated:" You should not change the license of your library. Rather, it is best to make it clear to him what the conditions are." [...] Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force (as GPL/GNU does) is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible.