논증 이론 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "논증 이론" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Korean rank

2^nd place

3^rd place

70^th place

157^th place

5^th place

11^th place

26^th place

70^th place

doi.org

Jory, Constanza Ihnen (May 2016). “Negotiation and deliberation: grasping the difference”. 《Argumentation》 30 (2): 145–165 [146]. doi:10.1007/s10503-014-9343-1.
van Eemeren, Frans H.; Garssen, Bart; Krabbe, Erik C. W.; Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca; Verheij, Bart; Wagemans, Jean H. M. (2014). 《Handbook of argumentation theory》. New York: Springer Verlag. 65–66쪽. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5. ISBN 9789048194728. OCLC 871004444. At the start of Topics VIII.5, Aristotle distinguishes three types of dialogue by their different goals: (1) the truly dialectical debate, which is concerned with training (gumnasia), with critical examination (peira), or with inquiry (skepsis); (2) the didactic discussion, concerned with teaching; and (3) the competitive (eristic, contentious) type of debate in which winning is the only concern.
Walton, Douglas N. (1990). “What is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?”. 《The Journal of Philosophy》 87 (8): 399–419. doi:10.2307/2026735. JSTOR 2026735.
Palau, Raquel Mochales; Moens, Marie-Francine (2009년 6월 8일). 〈Argumentation mining〉. 《Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law》. ICAIL '09. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. 98–107쪽. doi:10.1145/1568234.1568246. ISBN 978-1-60558-597-0.

Walton, Douglas N. (1990). “What is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?”. 《The Journal of Philosophy》 87 (8): 399–419. doi:10.2307/2026735. JSTOR 2026735.

Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst (2004). “A Systematic Theory of Argumentation” (PDF). 《Published by the Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Philosophy》: 12. ISBN 0-521-83075-3 (hard). ISBN 0-521-53772-X (soft).

van Eemeren, Frans H.; Garssen, Bart; Krabbe, Erik C. W.; Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca; Verheij, Bart; Wagemans, Jean H. M. (2014). 《Handbook of argumentation theory》. New York: Springer Verlag. 65–66쪽. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5. ISBN 9789048194728. OCLC 871004444. At the start of Topics VIII.5, Aristotle distinguishes three types of dialogue by their different goals: (1) the truly dialectical debate, which is concerned with training (gumnasia), with critical examination (peira), or with inquiry (skepsis); (2) the didactic discussion, concerned with teaching; and (3) the competitive (eristic, contentious) type of debate in which winning is the only concern.