{{서적 인용|first1=Harold G. |last1=Coward |author1-link=해롤드 G. 카워드 |first2=John R. |last2=Hinnells |first3=Raymond Brady |last3=Williams |title=The South Asian Religious Diaspora in Britain, Canada, and the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mXrdXMaaYCkC&pg=PA133
Paik, Shailaja (September 2011). 《Mahar–Dalit–Buddhist: The history and politics of naming in Maharashtra》. 《Contributions to Indian Sociology》 45. 217–241쪽. doi:10.1177/006996671104500203. S2CID144346975.
Skaria, A (2015). 《Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question》. 《Journal of South Asian Studies》 38 (테일러 앤드 프랜시스). 450–452쪽. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726., Quote: "Here [Navayana Buddhism] there is not only a criticism of religion (most of all, Hinduism, but also prior traditions of Buddhism), but also of secularism, and that criticism is articulated moreover as a religion."
Buck, David C.; M, Kannan (2020년 10월 9일), Kannan, M. (편집), “Introduction” (영어), 《Tamil dalit literature : My own experience》, Mondes Indiens/South Asia (Pondichéry: Institut Français de Pondichéry), vii–xxxviii쪽, ISBN979-10-365-4987-8, 2023년 5월 6일에 확인함
Paik, Shailaja (September 2011). 《Mahar–Dalit–Buddhist: The history and politics of naming in Maharashtra》. 《Contributions to Indian Sociology》 45. 217–241쪽. doi:10.1177/006996671104500203. S2CID144346975.