러시아의 우크라이나 침공 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "러시아의 우크라이나 침공" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Korean rank
1st place
1st place
32nd place
656th place
49th place
110th place
12th place
65th place
7th place
36th place
20th place
66th place
low place
8,307th place
79th place
200th place
28th place
89th place
8th place
34th place
5th place
11th place
129th place
658th place
484th place
779th place
268th place
586th place
5,865th place
6,261st place
1,347th place
3,271st place
46th place
2nd place
306th place
3,989th place
61st place
112th place
210th place
387th place
1,870th place
6,980th place
1,388th place
2,883rd place
571st place
2,220th place
low place
low place
77th place
194th place
23rd place
71st place
low place
low place
4,148th place
2,629th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,588th place
3,685th place
low place
low place
9th place
20th place
1,754th place
3,718th place
737th place
1,754th place
109th place
409th place
1,602nd place
1,964th place
940th place
832nd place
3,287th place
8,757th place
3,951st place
low place
170th place
2,156th place
6,095th place
low place
1,227th place
low place
5,044th place
low place
1,643rd place
13th place
low place
541st place
357th place
2,325th place
108th place
363rd place
2,703rd place
4,786th place
1,146th place
3,477th place
342nd place
8th place
735th place
21st place
3,275th place
57th place
981st place
19th place

airlineratings.com

aljazeera.com

apnews.com

atlanticcouncil.org

azernews.az

bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

cbsnews.com

chosun.com

biz.chosun.com

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

cnn.com

cpc-ew.ro

  • Chifu, Iulian; Nantoi, Oazu; Sushko, Oleksandr (2009). 〈Russia–Georgia War of August 2008: Ukrainian Approach〉 (PDF). 《The Russian Georgian War: A trilateral cognitive institutional approach of the crisis decision-making process》. 부쿠레슈티: Editura Curtea Veche. 181쪽. ISBN 978-973-1983-19-6. 2018년 9월 30일에 원본 문서 (PDF)에서 보존된 문서. 2016년 2월 21일에 확인함. Conceptually, Russia sees Ukraine within the sphere of own 'privileged interests'; in fact, it means a modernized version of Brezhnev’s doctrine of 'limited sovereignty', realized after the occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968. 

facebook.com

ft.com

g4media.ro

ghostarchive.org

hani.co.kr

hankookilbo.com

m.hankookilbo.com

hankyung.com

huffingtonpost.co.uk

huffingtonpost.com

inquirer.com

interfax.com

interfax.com.ua

en.interfax.com.ua

kremlin.ru

kremlin.ru

en.kremlin.ru

kyivpost.com

  • Grytsenko, Oksana; Vlasova, Anastasia (2014년 4월 12일). “Armed pro-Russian insurgents in Luhansk say they are ready for police raid”. 《Kyiv Post》 (Luhansk: Businessgroup LLC). 2014년 4월 12일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2022년 2월 1일에 확인함. ... their top aim is federalization of the country through all-Ukrainian referendum, one step from secession from the nation. 'It should be a federation in the borders of Ukraine, but with the right to separate if people demand this,' Kariakin said, confident that 85 percent of people in Luhansk Oblast, Ukraine's seventh most populous with 2.2 million people, support him. 

lrt.lt

nato.int

  • “Relations with Ukraine”. 《NATO》 (NATO). 2020년 1월 11일. 2022년 2월 15일에 확인함. In September 2020, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy approved Ukraine’s new National Security Strategy, which provides for the development of the distinctive partnership with NATO with the aim of membership in NATO. 

n.news.naver.com

newsroompanama.com

nytimes.com

osce.org

politico.eu

  • Taylor, Paul (2021년 11월 23일). “Ukraine: NATO's original sin”. 《폴리티코》 (악셀 스프링거 AG). 2022년 1월 29일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2022년 2월 1일에 확인함. The result heightened Kremlin's fears of encirclement and of losing the strategic depth that enabled Russia to prevail over Western invaders twice ... no amount of assurances that NATO is not a threat to Russia, that its purpose is purely defensive or that none of its weapons would ever be used except in response to an attack could assuage Moscow. 
  • “Germany shelves Nord Stream 2 pipeline”. 《POLITICO》 (미국 영어). 2022년 2월 22일. 2022년 2월 23일에 확인함. 

rbc.ru

reuters.com

reuters.com

in.reuters.com

  • Polityuk, Pavel; Robinson, Matt; Baczynska, Gabriela; Goettig, Marcin; Graff, Peter; Elgood, Giles (2014년 2월 22일). Roche, Andrew, 편집. “Ukraine parliament removes Yanukovich, who flees Kiev in "coup". 《Reuters》 (Kyiv: Thomson Corporation). 2016년 6월 9일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2020년 11월 18일에 확인함. Underscoring Ukraine's regional divisions, leaders of Russian-speaking eastern provinces loyal to Yanukovich voted to challenge anti-Yanukovich steps by the central parliament. 

rferl.org

romaniatv.net

rudaw.net

rusi.org

  • Wilson, Andrew (2021년 12월 23일). “Russia and Ukraine: 'One People' as Putin Claims?”. 왕립합동군사연구소. 2022년 1월 24일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2022년 1월 25일에 확인함. Putin's key trope is that Ukrainians and Russians are 'one people', and he calls them both 'Russian'. He starts with a myth of common origin: 'Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians are all descendants of Ancient Rus', which was the largest state in Europe' from the 9th–13th centuries AD. 

splash247.com

substack.com

snyder.substack.com

theguardian.com

thejournal.ie

themoscowtimes.com

thetimes.co.uk

time.com

timesofisrael.com

tunisienumerique.com

news-tunisia.tunisienumerique.com

twitter.com

ukrinform.net

voakorea.com

vox.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

wsj.com

yna.co.kr

m.yna.co.kr

ynetnews.com

youtube.com

  • Remarks concerning Ukraine, 블라디미르 푸틴, Putin makes a statement following the Security Council meeting on Donbass recognition - 유튜브, RT, 21 February 2022, minutes 41:17–42:58. Quote: "Because of the openness and goodwill, our goodwill, relations between Russia and the West were at a high level. Russia fulfilled all its obligations, we withdrew troops from Germany, from the central and European countries, and it made a huge contribution in overcoming the legacy of the Cold War. We consistently suggested all kinds of cooperation, including in the form of the NATO council and OECD. ... [When I asked], how would America see Russia joining NATO? ... How did Americans really look at this possibility? You can see it in their practical steps, in regard for a country: Open support of the terrorists in North Caucasus; Ignoring our demands and our concerns in the security area; Withdrawing from the arms treaties, and so on and so forth. It still begs the question, why? Why did they do that? What for? Okay, you don't want to see a friend in us, an ally in us. But why do you want to make an enemy out of us?"