"(T)he Ahom system was in reality both 'monarchical' and 'aristocratical' as Captain Welsh pointed out long ago" (Sarkar 1992:3) harvcol error: 대상 없음: CITEREFSarkar1992 (help) Sarkar, J. N. (1992), 〈Chapter I The Ahom Administration〉, Barpujari, H. K., 《The Comprehensive History of Assam》 III, Guwahati: Assam Publication Board, 1–86쪽
Sarkar (1992, 6–7쪽) harvtxt error: 대상 없음: CITEREFSarkar1992 (help) Sarkar, J. N. (1992), 〈Chapter I The Ahom Administration〉, Barpujari, H. K., 《The Comprehensive History of Assam》 III, Guwahati: Assam Publication Board, 1–86쪽
"The Chutiya power began to decline with the beginning of the 16th century. Taking advantage of an anarchical condition in the Chutia kingdom under the rule of inefficient Dhirnarayan (c1504–1523), the Ahom King Suhungmung or Dihingia Raja (1497-1539) annexed the kingdom in 1523"(Dutta 1985) harvcol error: 대상 없음: CITEREFDutta1985 (help) Dutta, Sristidhar (1985), 《The Mataks and their Kingdom》, Allahabad: Chugh Publications
"Tributes seem to have flowed to their original state in Upper Burma from Mungdungshunkham and probably the covert colonialism ended in 1401 when the boundary between Mungdungshunkham and the Nara kingdom was finally fixed at the Patkai hills. There is reason to believe that the name Mungdunshunkham is closely associated with this covert colonialism of the time and it automatically disappeared when Mungdunshunkham became Asom after their new name Ahom.(Buragohain 1988) harvcol error: 대상 없음: CITEREFBuragohain1988 (help)