양자 결어긋남 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "양자 결어긋남" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Korean rank

12doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

11arxiv.org

69^th place

54^th place

11harvard.edu

18^th place

27^th place

4nih.gov

4^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1stahlke.org

low place

1ubc.ca

1,997^th place

1,227^th place

1usc.edu

1,077^th place

1,341^st place

1zdnet.com

786^th place

604^th place

1newscientist.com

774^th place

509^th place

1phys.org

1,283^rd place

1,671^st place

1nature.com

234^th place

148^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

11^th place

arxiv.org

Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2005). “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics”. 《Reviews of Modern Physics》 76 (4): 1267–1305. arXiv:quant-ph/0312059. Bibcode:2004RvMP...76.1267S. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267.
Joos and Zeh (1985) state ‘'Of course no unitary treatment of the time dependence can explain why only one of these dynamically independent components is experienced.'’ And in a recent review on decoherence, Joos (1999) states ‘'Does decoherence solve the measurement problem? Clearly not. What decoherence tells us is that certain objects appear classical when observed. But what is an observation? At some stage we still have to apply the usual probability rules of quantum theory.'’Adler, Stephen L. (2003). “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson”. 《Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics》 34 (1): 135–142. arXiv:quant-ph/0112095. Bibcode:2003SHPMP..34..135A. doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00086-2.
Bacon. “Decoherence, control, and symmetry in quantum computers”. arXiv:quant-ph/0305025.
Lidar, Daniel A.; Whaley, K. Birgitta (2003). 〈Decoherence-Free Subspaces and Subsystems〉. Benatti, F.; Floreanini, R. 《Irreversible Quantum Dynamics》. Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 622. Berlin. 83–120쪽. arXiv:quant-ph/0301032. Bibcode:2003LNP...622...83L. doi:10.1007/3-540-44874-8_5. ISBN 978-3-540-40223-7.
Zurek, Wojciech H. (2003). “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. 《Reviews of Modern Physics》 75 (3): 715. arXiv:quant-ph/0105127. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..715Z. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715.
Zurek, Wojciech (2002). “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited” (PDF). 《Los Alamos Science》 27. arXiv:quant-ph/0306072. Bibcode:2003quant.ph..6072Z.
V. P. Belavkin (1989). “A new wave equation for a continuous non-demolition measurement”. 《Physics Letters A》 140: 355–358. arXiv:quant-ph/0512136. Bibcode:1989PhLA..140..355B. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(89)90066-2.
Lidar, D. A.; Chuang, I. L.; Whaley, K. B. (1998). “Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation”. 《Physical Review Letters》 81 (12): 2594–2597. arXiv:quant-ph/9807004. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.2594L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2594.
Beau, M.; Kiukas, J.; Egusquiza, I. L.; del Campo, A. (2017). “Nonexponential quantum decay under environmental decoherence”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 119 (13): 130401. arXiv:1706.06943. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.119m0401B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130401. PMID 29341721.
Xu, Z.; García-Pintos, L. P.; Chenu, A.; del Campo, A. (2019). “Extreme Decoherence and Quantum Chaos”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 122 (1): 014103. arXiv:1810.02319. Bibcode:2019PhRvL.122a4103X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.014103. PMID 31012673.
Vepsäläinen, Antti P.; Karamlou, Amir H.; Orrell, John L.; Dogra, Akshunna S.; Loer, Ben; Vasconcelos, Francisca; Kim, David K.; Melville, Alexander J.; Niedzielski, Bethany M. (August 2020). “Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence”. 《Nature》 (영어) 584 (7822): 551–556. arXiv:2001.09190. Bibcode:2020Natur.584..551V. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32848227. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2005). “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics”. 《Reviews of Modern Physics》 76 (4): 1267–1305. arXiv:quant-ph/0312059. Bibcode:2004RvMP...76.1267S. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267.
Joos and Zeh (1985) state ‘'Of course no unitary treatment of the time dependence can explain why only one of these dynamically independent components is experienced.'’ And in a recent review on decoherence, Joos (1999) states ‘'Does decoherence solve the measurement problem? Clearly not. What decoherence tells us is that certain objects appear classical when observed. But what is an observation? At some stage we still have to apply the usual probability rules of quantum theory.'’Adler, Stephen L. (2003). “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson”. 《Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics》 34 (1): 135–142. arXiv:quant-ph/0112095. Bibcode:2003SHPMP..34..135A. doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00086-2.
Lidar, Daniel A.; Whaley, K. Birgitta (2003). 〈Decoherence-Free Subspaces and Subsystems〉. Benatti, F.; Floreanini, R. 《Irreversible Quantum Dynamics》. Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 622. Berlin. 83–120쪽. arXiv:quant-ph/0301032. Bibcode:2003LNP...622...83L. doi:10.1007/3-540-44874-8_5. ISBN 978-3-540-40223-7.
Zurek, Wojciech H. (2003). “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. 《Reviews of Modern Physics》 75 (3): 715. arXiv:quant-ph/0105127. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..715Z. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715.
V. P. Belavkin (1989). “A new wave equation for a continuous non-demolition measurement”. 《Physics Letters A》 140: 355–358. arXiv:quant-ph/0512136. Bibcode:1989PhLA..140..355B. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(89)90066-2.
Lidar, D. A.; Chuang, I. L.; Whaley, K. B. (1998). “Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation”. 《Physical Review Letters》 81 (12): 2594–2597. arXiv:quant-ph/9807004. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.2594L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2594.
Beau, M.; Kiukas, J.; Egusquiza, I. L.; del Campo, A. (2017). “Nonexponential quantum decay under environmental decoherence”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 119 (13): 130401. arXiv:1706.06943. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.119m0401B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130401. PMID 29341721.
Xu, Z.; García-Pintos, L. P.; Chenu, A.; del Campo, A. (2019). “Extreme Decoherence and Quantum Chaos”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 122 (1): 014103. arXiv:1810.02319. Bibcode:2019PhRvL.122a4103X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.014103. PMID 31012673.
M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J. M. Raimond, S. Haroche (1996년 12월 9일). “Observing the Progressive Decoherence of the "Meter" in a Quantum Measurement”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 77 (24): 4887–4890. Bibcode:1996PhRvL..77.4887B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4887. PMID 10062660. CS1 관리 - 여러 이름 (링크)
Vepsäläinen, Antti P.; Karamlou, Amir H.; Orrell, John L.; Dogra, Akshunna S.; Loer, Ben; Vasconcelos, Francisca; Kim, David K.; Melville, Alexander J.; Niedzielski, Bethany M. (August 2020). “Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence”. 《Nature》 (영어) 584 (7822): 551–556. arXiv:2001.09190. Bibcode:2020Natur.584..551V. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32848227. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.
Leggett, A. J. (2001). “Probing quantum mechanics towards the everyday world: where do we stand”. 《Physica Scripta》 102 (1): 69–73. doi:10.1238/Physica.Topical.102a00069.
Leggett, A. J. (2002). “Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: Motivation, state of play, prospects”. 《Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter》 14 (15): R415–R451. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/15/201.

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2005). “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics”. 《Reviews of Modern Physics》 76 (4): 1267–1305. arXiv:quant-ph/0312059. Bibcode:2004RvMP...76.1267S. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267.
Joos and Zeh (1985) state ‘'Of course no unitary treatment of the time dependence can explain why only one of these dynamically independent components is experienced.'’ And in a recent review on decoherence, Joos (1999) states ‘'Does decoherence solve the measurement problem? Clearly not. What decoherence tells us is that certain objects appear classical when observed. But what is an observation? At some stage we still have to apply the usual probability rules of quantum theory.'’Adler, Stephen L. (2003). “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson”. 《Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics》 34 (1): 135–142. arXiv:quant-ph/0112095. Bibcode:2003SHPMP..34..135A. doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00086-2.
Lidar, Daniel A.; Whaley, K. Birgitta (2003). 〈Decoherence-Free Subspaces and Subsystems〉. Benatti, F.; Floreanini, R. 《Irreversible Quantum Dynamics》. Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 622. Berlin. 83–120쪽. arXiv:quant-ph/0301032. Bibcode:2003LNP...622...83L. doi:10.1007/3-540-44874-8_5. ISBN 978-3-540-40223-7.
Zurek, Wojciech H. (2003). “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. 《Reviews of Modern Physics》 75 (3): 715. arXiv:quant-ph/0105127. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..715Z. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715.
Zurek, Wojciech (2002). “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited” (PDF). 《Los Alamos Science》 27. arXiv:quant-ph/0306072. Bibcode:2003quant.ph..6072Z.
V. P. Belavkin (1989). “A new wave equation for a continuous non-demolition measurement”. 《Physics Letters A》 140: 355–358. arXiv:quant-ph/0512136. Bibcode:1989PhLA..140..355B. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(89)90066-2.
Lidar, D. A.; Chuang, I. L.; Whaley, K. B. (1998). “Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation”. 《Physical Review Letters》 81 (12): 2594–2597. arXiv:quant-ph/9807004. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.2594L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2594.
Beau, M.; Kiukas, J.; Egusquiza, I. L.; del Campo, A. (2017). “Nonexponential quantum decay under environmental decoherence”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 119 (13): 130401. arXiv:1706.06943. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.119m0401B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130401. PMID 29341721.
Xu, Z.; García-Pintos, L. P.; Chenu, A.; del Campo, A. (2019). “Extreme Decoherence and Quantum Chaos”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 122 (1): 014103. arXiv:1810.02319. Bibcode:2019PhRvL.122a4103X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.014103. PMID 31012673.
M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J. M. Raimond, S. Haroche (1996년 12월 9일). “Observing the Progressive Decoherence of the "Meter" in a Quantum Measurement”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 77 (24): 4887–4890. Bibcode:1996PhRvL..77.4887B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4887. PMID 10062660. CS1 관리 - 여러 이름 (링크)
Vepsäläinen, Antti P.; Karamlou, Amir H.; Orrell, John L.; Dogra, Akshunna S.; Loer, Ben; Vasconcelos, Francisca; Kim, David K.; Melville, Alexander J.; Niedzielski, Bethany M. (August 2020). “Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence”. 《Nature》 (영어) 584 (7822): 551–556. arXiv:2001.09190. Bibcode:2020Natur.584..551V. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32848227. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

nature.com

Vepsäläinen, Antti P.; Karamlou, Amir H.; Orrell, John L.; Dogra, Akshunna S.; Loer, Ben; Vasconcelos, Francisca; Kim, David K.; Melville, Alexander J.; Niedzielski, Bethany M. (August 2020). “Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence”. 《Nature》 (영어) 584 (7822): 551–556. arXiv:2001.09190. Bibcode:2020Natur.584..551V. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32848227. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

newscientist.com

“Quantum computers may be destroyed by high-energy particles from space”. 《New Scientist》. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Beau, M.; Kiukas, J.; Egusquiza, I. L.; del Campo, A. (2017). “Nonexponential quantum decay under environmental decoherence”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 119 (13): 130401. arXiv:1706.06943. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.119m0401B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130401. PMID 29341721.
Xu, Z.; García-Pintos, L. P.; Chenu, A.; del Campo, A. (2019). “Extreme Decoherence and Quantum Chaos”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 122 (1): 014103. arXiv:1810.02319. Bibcode:2019PhRvL.122a4103X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.014103. PMID 31012673.
M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J. M. Raimond, S. Haroche (1996년 12월 9일). “Observing the Progressive Decoherence of the "Meter" in a Quantum Measurement”. 《Phys. Rev. Lett.》 77 (24): 4887–4890. Bibcode:1996PhRvL..77.4887B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4887. PMID 10062660. CS1 관리 - 여러 이름 (링크)
Vepsäläinen, Antti P.; Karamlou, Amir H.; Orrell, John L.; Dogra, Akshunna S.; Loer, Ben; Vasconcelos, Francisca; Kim, David K.; Melville, Alexander J.; Niedzielski, Bethany M. (August 2020). “Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence”. 《Nature》 (영어) 584 (7822): 551–556. arXiv:2001.09190. Bibcode:2020Natur.584..551V. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32848227. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

phys.org

“Cosmic rays may soon stymie quantum computing”. 《phys.org》 (영어). 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

stahlke.org

Dan Stahlke. “Quantum Decoherence and the Measurement Problem” (PDF). 2011년 7월 23일에 확인함.

ubc.ca

publicaffairs.ubc.ca

“Discovery may overcome obstacle for quantum computing: UBC, California researchers”. University of British Columbia. 2011년 7월 20일. 2014년 8월 29일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2011년 7월 23일에 확인함. Our theory also predicted that we could suppress the decoherence, and push the decoherence rate in the experiment to levels far below the threshold necessary for quantum information processing, by applying high magnetic fields. (...)Magnetic molecules now suddenly appear to have serious potential as candidates for quantum computing hardware", said Susumu Takahashi, assistant professor of chemistry and physics at the University of Southern California. "This opens up a whole new area of experimental investigation with sizeable potential in applications, as well as for fundamental work".

usc.edu

uscnews.usc.edu

“USC Scientists Contribute to a Breakthrough in Quantum Computing”. University of California, Santa Barbara. 2011년 7월 20일. 2012년 4월 2일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2011년 7월 23일에 확인함.

web.archive.org

“Discovery may overcome obstacle for quantum computing: UBC, California researchers”. University of British Columbia. 2011년 7월 20일. 2014년 8월 29일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2011년 7월 23일에 확인함. Our theory also predicted that we could suppress the decoherence, and push the decoherence rate in the experiment to levels far below the threshold necessary for quantum information processing, by applying high magnetic fields. (...)Magnetic molecules now suddenly appear to have serious potential as candidates for quantum computing hardware", said Susumu Takahashi, assistant professor of chemistry and physics at the University of Southern California. "This opens up a whole new area of experimental investigation with sizeable potential in applications, as well as for fundamental work".
“USC Scientists Contribute to a Breakthrough in Quantum Computing”. University of California, Santa Barbara. 2011년 7월 20일. 2012년 4월 2일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2011년 7월 23일에 확인함.

worldcat.org

Vepsäläinen, Antti P.; Karamlou, Amir H.; Orrell, John L.; Dogra, Akshunna S.; Loer, Ben; Vasconcelos, Francisca; Kim, David K.; Melville, Alexander J.; Niedzielski, Bethany M. (August 2020). “Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence”. 《Nature》 (영어) 584 (7822): 551–556. arXiv:2001.09190. Bibcode:2020Natur.584..551V. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32848227. 2020년 9월 7일에 확인함.

zdnet.com

“Breakthrough removes major hurdle for quantum computing”. 《ZDNet》. 2011년 7월 20일. 2011년 7월 23일에 확인함.