자본주의에 대한 비판 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "자본주의에 대한 비판" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Korean rank
1st place
1st place
803rd place
665th place
2nd place
3rd place
3rd place
9th place
6th place
18th place
low place
low place
26th place
70th place
11th place
310th place
5th place
11th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
12th place
65th place
18th place
27th place
7th place
36th place
485th place
371st place
580th place
476th place
low place
low place
281st place
644th place
1,031st place
1,010th place
2,932nd place
5,948th place
198th place
410th place
9th place
20th place
102nd place
307th place
240th place
2,059th place
61st place
112th place
346th place
1,053rd place
9,512th place
4,305th place
low place
low place
209th place
116th place
657th place
250th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,883rd place
low place
2,523rd place
5,650th place
low place
low place
4,672nd place
7,885th place
132nd place
451st place
14th place
15th place
49th place
110th place
34th place
124th place
471st place
479th place
low place
6,106th place
412th place
1,003rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
78th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
910th place
797th place
low place
low place
1,041st place
815th place
1,844th place
1,380th place
2,734th place
5,768th place
low place
low place
5,166th place
4,740th place
low place
low place
702nd place
891st place
8,545th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,234th place
3,177th place
3,440th place
9,003rd place
5,363rd place
7,529th place
741st place
281st place
2,008th place
9,188th place
882nd place
710th place
low place
low place
1,601st place
836th place
7,014th place
low place
275th place
1,198th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,341st place
3,671st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
140th place
251st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,903rd place
8,574th place
4,270th place
3,093rd place
1,077th place
1,341st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
175th place
670th place
109th place
409th place
928th place
1,005th place
4th place
4th place
228th place
513th place
5,447th place
7,202nd place
low place
low place
3,505th place
2,158th place
3,745th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,524th place
207th place
220th place
193rd place
246th place
low place
low place
703rd place
920th place
415th place
263rd place
1,108th place
3,693rd place
731st place
373rd place
222nd place
164th place

adamsmith.org

alternet.org

amconmag.com

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.org

archive.today

  • O'Leary, Naomi (2013년 11월 26일). “Pope attacks 'tyranny' of markets in manifesto for papacy”. Business News. 《Reuters》. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. Pope Francis attacked unfettered capitalism as 'a new tyranny' and beseeched global leaders to fight poverty and growing inequality, in a document on Tuesday setting out a platform for his papacy and calling for a renewal of the Catholic Church. 

archives-ouvertes.fr

halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

basicbooks.com

berkeley.edu

globetrotter.berkeley.edu

binghamton.edu

fbc.binghamton.edu

books.google.com

britannica.com

  • in Encyclopædia Britannica (2009). Retrieved 14 October 2009, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online: https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism, "Main" summary: "Socialists complain that capitalism necessarily leads to unfair and exploitative concentrations of wealth and power in the hands of the relative few who emerge victorious from free-market competition—people who then use their wealth and power to reinforce their dominance in society."

businessinsider.com

  • Udland, Myles (2016년 5월 27일). “IMF: The last generation of economic policies may have been a complete failure”. 《Business Insider》. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. Neoliberalism—which IMF researchers Jonathan Ostry, Prakash Loungani, and Davide Furceri loosely define as the opening of economies to foreign capital along with a reduction in government debt burdens—has been the dominant trend in economic policymaking over the past 30 years. ... But now it seems some at the IMF aren't so sure this tradition is all it's been cracked up to be. In their paper, Ostray, Loungani, and Furceri argue that these goals have both hampered the economic growth that neoliberalism champions and exacerbated the rise of inequality. 

c-span.org

c4ss.org

cbo.gov

chomsky.info

commondreams.org

comyr.com

kclibertaria.comyr.com

  • "el capitalismo es sólo el efecto del gobierno; desaparecido el gobierno, el capitalismo cae de su pedestal vertiginosamente ... Lo que llamamos capitalismo no es otra cosa que el producto del Estado, dentro del cual lo único que se cultiva es la ganancia, bien o mal habida. Luchar, pues, contra el capitalismo es tarea inútil, porque sea Capitalismo de Estado o Capitalismo de Empresa, mientras el Gobierno exista, existirá el capital que explota. La lucha, pero de conciencias, es contra el Estado."Anarquismo by Miguel Gimenez Igualada 보관됨 31 1월 2017 - 웨이백 머신

davidmcminn.com

davisvanguard.org

democracynow.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

doi.org

e-elgar.com

econlib.org

eleuthera.it

  • Graeber 2004, 71

epa.gov

europeanconservative.com

faireconomy.org

faz.net

foreignaffairs.com

  • Muller, Jerry Z. (March–April 2013). “Capitalism and Inequality: What the Right and the Left Get Wrong”. 《Foreign Affairs》 (Essay). 92권 2호 (Council of Foreign Relations). ISSN 0015-7120. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. Inequality is indeed increasing almost everywhere in the postindustrial capitalist world. But despite what many on the left think, this is not the result of politics, nor is politics likely to reverse it, for the problem is more deeply rooted and intractable than generally recognized. Inequality is an inevitable product of capitalist activity, and expanding equality of opportunity only increases it—because some individuals and communities are simply better able than others to exploit the opportunities for development and advancement that capitalism affords. 

h-net.org

networks.h-net.org

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

hup.harvard.edu

cyber.law.harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

historycooperative.org

huffingtonpost.com

inclusivedemocracy.org

isreview.org

it-environment.org

jacobinmag.com

  • Grandin, Greg (2014년 8월 1일). 《Capitalism and Slavery: An Interview with Greg Grandin》. 《Jacobin》. 인터뷰어: Alex Gourevitch. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. There's many ways this happens. Deceit, through contraband, is absolutely key to the expansion of slavery in South America. When historians talk about the Atlantic market revolution, they are talking about capitalism. And when they are talking about capitalism, they are talking about slavery. And when they are talking about slavery, they are talking about corruption and crime. Not in a moral sense, in that the slave system was a crime against humanity. That it was. But it was also a crime in a technical sense: probably as many enslaved Africans came into South America as contraband, to avoid taxes and other lingering restrictions, as legally. 

jstor.org

learndeen.com

levyinstitute.org

mahost.org

question-everything.mahost.org

marxists.org

merriam-webster.com

mit.edu

direct.mit.edu

monthlyreview.org

motherjones.com

mqup.ca

msu.edu

coursesa.matrix.msu.edu

mutualist.org

newadvent.org

newshub.co.nz

newstatesman.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nla.gov.au

catalogue.nla.gov.au

nymag.com

nytimes.com

  • McDowell, Edwin (1988년 1월 6일). “Best Sellers From 1987's Book Crop”. 《The New York Times. 2011년 10월 13일에 확인함. 
  • Andrews, Edmund L. (2008년 10월 23일). “Greenspan Concedes Error on Regulation”. Economy. 《The New York Times》. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. He noted that the immense and largely unregulated business of spreading financial risk widely, through the use of exotic financial instruments called derivatives, had gotten out of control and had added to the havoc of today's crisis. As far back as 1994, Mr. Greenspan staunchly and successfully opposed tougher regulation on derivatives. But on Thursday, he agreed that the multitrillion-dollar market for credit default swaps, instruments originally created to insure bond investors against the risk of default, needed to be restrained. 'This modern risk-management paradigm held sway for decades,' he said. 'The whole intellectual edifice, however, collapsed in the summer of last year.' 
  • Knowlton, Brian; Grynbaum, Michael M. (2008년 10월 23일). “Greenspan 'shocked' that free markets are flawed”. International Business. 《The New York Times》. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. Pressed by Waxman, Greenspan conceded a more serious flaw in his own philosophy that unfettered free markets sit at the root of a superior economy. 'I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such as that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms,' Greenspan said. ... 'In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working,' Waxman said. 'Absolutely, precisely,' Greenspan replied. "You know, that's precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.' 

orbooks.com

oup.com

academic.oup.com

global.oup.com

papalencyclicals.net

pbs.org

princeton.edu

press.princeton.edu

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

rdwolff.com

reference.com

dictionary.reference.com

repec.org

econpapers.repec.org

reuters.com

  • O'Leary, Naomi (2013년 11월 26일). “Pope attacks 'tyranny' of markets in manifesto for papacy”. Business News. 《Reuters》. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. Pope Francis attacked unfettered capitalism as 'a new tyranny' and beseeched global leaders to fight poverty and growing inequality, in a document on Tuesday setting out a platform for his papacy and calling for a renewal of the Catholic Church. 

routledge.com

rowman.com

sagepub.com

journals.sagepub.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

smh.com.au

  • Gittins, Ross (2012년 4월 9일). “What Jesus said about capitalism”. Business. 《The Sydney Morning Herald》. Fairfax Media. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. It's certainly true that Jesus was always blessing the poor, challenging the rich, mixing with despised tax-gatherers and speaking of a time when the social order is overturned and 'the last shall be first'. It's also true, as Myers reminds us, that many of Jesus's parables deal with clearly economic concerns: farming, shepherding, being in debt, doing hard labour, being excluded from banquets and the houses of the rich. 

social-ecology.org

spunk.org

ssrn.com

theage.com.au

theamericanconservative.com

theatlantic.com

theconversation.com

thecorporation.com

theguardian.com

theintercept.com

therealnews.com

  • Gérard, Duménil (2010년 3월 30일). 《The crisis of neoliberalism》. Paul Jay와의 Transcript. The Real News. 2018년 4월 6일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2018년 4월 6일에 확인함. When we speak of neoliberalism, we speak of contemporary capitalism. Neoliberalism, it's a new stage of capitalism which began around 1980. It began in big countries like United Kingdom and the United States. Then it was implemented in Europe, and later in Japan, and later around the world in general. So this is a new phase of capitalism. 

time.com

time.com

healthland.time.com

tntu.edu.ua

elartu.tntu.edu.ua

truth-out.org

umass.edu

unpop.nl

unu.edu

upenn.edu

usc.edu

www-pam.usc.edu

utoronto.ca

chass.utoronto.ca

vatican.va

vice.com

motherboard.vice.com

victorianweb.org

virginia.edu

etext.virginia.edu

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • Baba Metzia 61b
  • Slobodian 2023, 1–3쪽.
  • Sullivan & Hickel 2023.
  • Nitzan & Bichler 2009, 29쪽.
  • Roediger 2007a. The term is not without its critics, as Roediger 2007b, 247쪽, notes: "[T]he challenge to loose connections of wage (or white) slavery to chattel slavery was led by Frederick Douglass and other Black, often fugitive, abolitionists. Their challenge was mercilessly concrete. Douglass, who tried out speeches in work places before giving them in halls, was far from unable to speak to or hear white workers, but he and William Wells Brown did challenge metaphors regarding white slavery sharply. They noted, for example, that their escapes from slavery had left job openings and wondered if any white workers wanted to take the jobs."
  • Fitzhugh 1857, xvi
  • Carsel 1940.
  • Marx 1847, Chapter 2
  • Graeber 2004, 71
  • Graeber 2007, 106쪽.
  • Marx 1990, 1006쪽: "[L]abour-power, a commodity sold by the worker himself."
  • Nelson 1995, 158쪽. This Marxist objection is what motivated Nelson's essay, which argues that labor is not, in fact, a commodity.
  • Marx 1990, 1005쪽. Emphasis in the original.
    See also p. 716: "[T]he capitalist produces [and reproduces] the worker as a wage-labourer. This incessant reproduction, this perpetuation of the worker, is the absolutely necessary condition for capitalist production."

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

wired.com

worldcat.org

worldsocialism.org

wsws.org

  • "To Marx, the problem of reconstituting society did not arise from some prescription, motivated by his personal predilections; it followed, as an iron-clad historical necessity—on the one hand, from the productive forces grown to powerful maturity; on the other, from the impossibility further to organize these forces according to the will of the law of value." — Leon Trotsky, "Marxism in our Time", 1939 (Inevitability of Socialism), WSWS.org 보관됨 13 11월 2008 - 웨이백 머신

youtube.com

zmag.org