Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "정체성주의" in Korean language version.
It was the transition from French nationalism to the promotion of a European identity, theorised by Europe-Action in the mid-1960s, which disrupted the references of the French far-right by producing a schism which has not been repaired to date, separating integral sovereignists, for whom no level of sovereignty is legitimate except the sovereignty of the nation state, (...) from the identitarians, for whom the nation state is an intermediate framework between being rooted in a region (in the sense of the German "Heimat") and belonging to the framework of European civilisation.
This mixophobic discourse, that is to say the fear of ethnic mixing, can be found in their geopolitical vision ... [Identitarians] defend the idea of an ethnically homogeneous Europe ... [they] reject the nation-state in favour of a confederation of regions which have strong identities, inscribing themselves in the idea of a "great European imperial nationalism" ... This form of nationalism must therefore be understood in its European continental dimension and it must no longer be understood in its national dimension, which is seen as having been inherited from the dubious philosophy of the French Revolution ...
It was the transition from French nationalism to the promotion of a European identity, theorised by Europe-Action in the mid-1960s, which disrupted the references of the French far-right by producing a schism which has not been repaired to date, separating integral sovereignists, for whom no level of sovereignty is legitimate except the sovereignty of the nation state, (...) from the identitarians, for whom the nation state is an intermediate framework between being rooted in a region (in the sense of the German "Heimat") and belonging to the framework of European civilisation.
