Fimozė (Lithuanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Fimozė" in Lithuanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Lithuanian rank
4th place
12th place
1st place
1st place
2nd place
10th place
3rd place
13th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
818th place
11th place
926th place
3,763rd place
1,772nd place

aappublications.org (Global: 3,763rd place; Lithuanian: 1,772nd place)

pediatrics.aappublications.org

  • Van Howe RS (1998 m. spalio mėn.). „Cost-effective treatment of phimosis“. Pediatrics. 102 (4): E43. doi:10.1542/peds.102.4.e43. PMID 9755280. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2009-08-19. A review of estimated costs and complications of 3 phimosis treatments (topical steroids, praeputioplasty, and surgical circumcision). The review concludes that topical steroids should be tried first, and praeputioplasty has advantages over surgical circumcision. This article also provides a good discussion of the difficulty distinguishing pathological from physiological phimosis in young children and alleges inflation of phimosis statistics for purposes of securing insurance coverage for post-neonatal circumcision in the United States.

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Lithuanian: 13th place)

  • Kirk RH, Winslet MC (2007). Essential General Surgical Operations (anglų). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 365. ISBN 978-0443103148. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2017-11-05.

cfp.ca (Global: low place; Lithuanian: low place)

cps.ca (Global: low place; Lithuanian: low place)

caringforkids.cps.ca

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Lithuanian: 10th place)

healthychildren.org (Global: low place; Lithuanian: low place)

mja.com.au (Global: low place; Lithuanian: 818th place)

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; Lithuanian: 12th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

phimosis.ca (Global: low place; Lithuanian: low place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; Lithuanian: 926th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Lithuanian: 1st place)

  • Kirk RH, Winslet MC (2007). Essential General Surgical Operations (anglų). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 365. ISBN 978-0443103148. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2017-11-05.
  • „Phimosis“. PubMed Health. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2017-11-05. Nuoroda tikrinta 2016-10-28.
  • „What are the treatment options for phimosis?“. PubMed Health. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. 2015-10-07. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2017-11-05. Nuoroda tikrinta 2016-10-28.
  • „What are the treatment options for phimosis?“. PubMed Health. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. 2015-10-07. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2017-11-05. Nuoroda tikrinta 2016-10-28.
  • „Care of the Uncircumcised Penis“. Guide for parents. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2007 m. rugsėjo mėn. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2012-08-30.
  • „Caring for an uncircumcised penis“. Information for parents. Canadian Paediatric Society. 2012 m. liepos mėn. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2012-07-16.
  • Denniston GC, Hill G (2010 m. spalio mėn.). „Gairdner was wrong“. Canadian Family Physician. 56 (10): 986–7. PMC 2954072. PMID 20944034. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2015-09-23. Nuoroda tikrinta 2014-04-05.
  • Thorvaldsen MA, Meyhoff HH (2005 m. balandžio mėn.). „[Pathological or physiological phimosis?]“ (PDF). Ugeskrift for Laeger. 167 (17): 1858–62. PMID 15929334. Suarchyvuotas originalas (PDF) 2016-02-07. Nuoroda tikrinta 2012-12-03.
  • Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Wisniewski ZS, Holman CD (2003 m. vasario mėn.). „Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys“. The Medical Journal of Australia. 178 (4): 155–8. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05130.x. PMID 12580740. S2CID 9842095. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2004-11-09.. Recent Australian statistics with good discussion of ascertainment problems arising from surgical statistics.
  • Van Howe RS (1998 m. spalio mėn.). „Cost-effective treatment of phimosis“. Pediatrics. 102 (4): E43. doi:10.1542/peds.102.4.e43. PMID 9755280. Suarchyvuota iš originalo 2009-08-19. A review of estimated costs and complications of 3 phimosis treatments (topical steroids, praeputioplasty, and surgical circumcision). The review concludes that topical steroids should be tried first, and praeputioplasty has advantages over surgical circumcision. This article also provides a good discussion of the difficulty distinguishing pathological from physiological phimosis in young children and alleges inflation of phimosis statistics for purposes of securing insurance coverage for post-neonatal circumcision in the United States.