Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Kulup" in Malay language version.
Last modified:
|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|date= (bantuan)|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan)[pautan mati kekal]There is indirect evidence suggesting that the foreskin may have an important sensory function, although aside from anecdotal reports, it has not been demonstrated that this is associated with increased male sexual pleasure.Unknown parameter
|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan); |volume= has extra text (bantuan); |issue= has extra text (bantuan)|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan); Check date values in: |date= (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan)|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)The outer layer of the prepuce in common with the skin of the shaft of the penis glides freely in a to and fro fashion and has to be delicate and thin, as was observed in this study. [...] The inner lining of the projecting tubular part has the structure of the outer layer and adds to the thin gliding skin when retracted.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
|date= (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan)|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan)[pautan mati kekal]|month= ignored (bantuan)Opponents of circumcision, using results from selected observational studies, have argued that the procedure impairs sexual function, and reduces sexual pleasure and satisfaction through keratinization of the glans, removal of the most sensitive preputial tissues, and loss of the 'gliding' mechanism provided by the foreskinUnknown parameter
|doi_brokendate= ignored (bantuan); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (bantuan); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|author= (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|month= ignored (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|month= ignored (bantuan)Opponents of circumcision, using results from selected observational studies, have argued that the procedure impairs sexual function, and reduces sexual pleasure and satisfaction through keratinization of the glans, removal of the most sensitive preputial tissues, and loss of the 'gliding' mechanism provided by the foreskinUnknown parameter
|doi_brokendate= ignored (bantuan); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (bantuan); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)|author= (bantuan)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|month= ignored (bantuan); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan)There is indirect evidence suggesting that the foreskin may have an important sensory function, although aside from anecdotal reports, it has not been demonstrated that this is associated with increased male sexual pleasure.Unknown parameter
|coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (bantuan); |volume= has extra text (bantuan); |issue= has extra text (bantuan)|month= ignored (bantuan)Although it has been argued that sexual function may diminish following circumcision due to the removal of the nerve endings in the foreskin and subsequent thickening of the epithelia of the glans, there is little evidence for this and studies are inconsistent.
|date= (bantuan)