BDS-beweging (Dutch Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "BDS-beweging" in Dutch language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Dutch rank
1st place
1st place
497th place
461st place
low place
low place
571st place
502nd place
low place
2,635th place
567th place
2nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3rd place
43rd place
268th place
432nd place
12th place
24th place
1,870th place
3,051st place
low place
6,480th place
1,015th place
951st place
36th place
67th place
1,757th place
2,530th place
1,076th place
6th place
6,798th place
low place
low place
low place
705th place
3rd place
269th place
635th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,771st place
low place
544th place
901st place
1,423rd place
17th place
1,210th place
896th place
34th place
111th place
1,810th place
2,447th place
1,344th place
8,662nd place
low place
low place
204th place
535th place
low place
low place
8th place
30th place
low place
low place
226th place
580th place
low place
low place

ad.nl

adl.org

aljazeera.com

amnestyusa.org

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bdsmovement.net

bdsnederland.nl

bibjetzt.wordpress.com

books.google.com

daysofpalestine.ps

dw.com

electronicintifada.net

euromedrights.org

forward.com

google.nl

books.google.nl

haaretz.com

independent.co.uk

jewishvoiceforpeace.org

jpost.com

jta.org

lebenshaus-alb.de

middleeastmonitor.com

mondoweiss.net

newsweek.com

nos.nl

nrc.nl

ohchr.org

peacenow.org.il

rightsforum.org

socialistworker.co.uk

sueddeutsche.de

theguardian.com

  • BDS: how a controversial non-violent movement has transformed the Israeli-Palestinian debate. Nathan Thrall, The Guardian, 14 augustus 2018.
    "Since its founding 13 years ago, it has acquired nearly as many enemies as the Israelis and Palestinians combined. [...]
    ... the charge of apartheid ... was not merely a provocative analogy to South Africa but a legal claim, based on the crime of apartheid as defined in international conventions and the founding statute of the international criminal court: [...]
    The more deeply entrenched this one-state reality became, the more resonant the charge of apartheid, and the more difficult to imagine undoing it through partition into two states. [...]
    Perhaps Israel’s most powerful tool in the campaign against delegitimisation has been to accuse the country’s critics of antisemitism. Doing so required changing official definitions of the term. This effort began during the final years of the second intifada, in 2003 and 2004, as pre-BDS calls to boycott and divest from Israel were gaining steam."
  • Israel's boycott ban draws fire from law professors. The Guardian, 14 juli 2011

timesofisrael.com

vimeo.com

  • Omar Barghouti – Strategies for change (5:32-6:05), video van interview uit 2013.
    "A Jewish state in Palestine in any shape or form cannot but contravene the basic rights of the land’s indigenous Palestinian population and perpetuate a system of racial discrimination that ought to be opposed categorically. As we would oppose a Muslim state or a Christian state, or any kind of exclusionary state, definitely, most definitely we oppose a Jewish state in any part of Palestine."

washingtonpost.com

  • Israeli minister: Criticizing Israel is the new anti-Semitism. Voormalig minister Ayelet Shaked in de Washington Post van 4 mei 2016:
    "In the past, we saw European leaders speaking against the Jews. Now, we see them speaking against Israel. It is the same anti-Semitism of blood libels, spreading lies, distorting reality and brainwashing people into hating Israel and the Jews,"

web.archive.org

ynetnews.com