Vgl. Álvaro Fernández Fernández, “Bibliographia Daemonologica Antiquitatis Graecae et Romanae”, in: MHNH 6(2006), pp. 243-298 (https://www.academia.edu/23121714)
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
journals.openedition.org
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
Vgl. Plato, Apologia 31c–d, 40a-c, 41d; Eutyphro 3b; Euthydemos 272e–273a.; Politeia 496c.; Phaidros 242b–243b; Theaitetos 151a. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 20122), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Jacob Dvorak, “The Philosopher Within: the daimōn in Plato”, in: Philomathes (2019) (https://www.academia.edu/96717210/)
Vgl. Plutarchus, De Genio Socratis, Greek ed.: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0305 (Engels: Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, red., Plutarch, On the daimonion of Socrates. Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy, Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, e.a. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010) (https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/on-the-daimonion-of-socrates-9783161564444/)).
Vgl. Xenophon, Memories IV,8,1.5. Het valt op dat Xenophon hem wel, en Plato niet probeert vrij te spreken van “vreemde goden”, de reden waarom hij veroordeeld is. Vgl. Louis-André Dorion, “The Daimonion and the Megalêgoria of Socrates in Xenophon’s Apology”, in: P. Destrée & Nicolas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ divine sign: religion, practice, and value in Socratic philosophy (= Apeiron 38(2005)2), pp. 127-142 (https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.2.127; https://www.academia.edu/3753389).
Vgl. Plotinus, Enneaden III,4 en III,5. Vgl. John M. Rist, “Plotinus and the "Daimonion" of Socrates”, in: Phoenix' 17(1963)1, pp. 13-24 (https://doi.org/10.2307/1085843);
Vgl. voor het Neoplatonisme: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Cornell University Press, 1996); Gregory Shaw, Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2014).
Vgl. verder Henry Edward Manning (Archbishop Of Westminster), “The daemon of Socrates: a paper read before the Royal Institution, Jan. 26, 1872” (https://archive.org/stream/a591631100mannuoft/a591631100mannuoft_djvu.txt) (getranscribeerd) en https://www.scribd.com/document/37138773/ (gedrukt); F.J. Olivieri, “Lo demonico en Socrates”, in: Anales de Historia Antigua y Medieval 21(1980-81), pp. 242-257; Inmaculada Rodríguez Moreno, “La Cosmovisión demonológica de Sócrates”, in: Anales de la Universidad de Cádiz (1992-1993)9-10, pp. 101-114 (https://rodin.uca.es/handle/10498/11451); Mark A. Joyal, “The Divine Sign Did Not Oppose Me”, in: Idem, red., A Problem In Plato’s Apology? Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 43–58, met review door Review door John Partridge in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review (2005) 07 (July), art. 57) (https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.07.57/); Antonius Wilhelmus Willibrordus Rieter, Socrates is een mens. Tragiek van een levenseinde (Best: Damon, 1998), pp. 273-292; M. Pierre Destrée, Nicholas D. Smith, red., Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2005) (= Apeiron 38(2005)2 (inhoudsopg.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40040854), review door Aikaterini Lefka, in: Kernos 20(2007), pp. 428-432 (https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/362)), met o.a. Luc Brisson, “Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato's Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition”, pp. 1-12; Mark L. McPherran, “Introducing a New God: Socrates and His Daimonion”, pp. 13-30; Gerd Van Riel, “Internalization of the Divine and Knowledge of the Self”, pp. 31–42; Mark Joyal, ““To Daimonion” and the Socratic Problem”, pp. 97-112 en Michel Narcy, “Socrates Sentenced by His Daimōn”, 113–25; Geert Roskam, “Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch”, in: Delfim F. Leão, Françoise Frazier, red., Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010), pp. 93–108; A. Lännström, “Trusting the Divine Voice: Socrates and His Daimonion”, in: Apeiron 45(2012)1, pp. 32–49; Louis-André Dorion, “Socrate, le daimonion et la divination”, in: Jérôme Laurent, red., Les dieux de Platon (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2012²), pp. 169-192 (https://books.openedition.org/puc/27617); Bridger Ehli, “Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion”, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(2018)2, pp. 225-240;
