Eenstaatoplossing (Dutch Wikipedia)

Greenstein, The Bi-nationalist Perspective in Israel/Palestine during the British Mandate, 1917-1948, Chapter 1. Zie par. The Roots of Bi-Nationalism en Brit Shalom. Ran Greenstein, 2014
"[The bi-nationalist associations of the Mandate period] adhered to a version of Zionism which supported the formation of a Jewish national home, frequently understood as a ‘spiritual centre’ rather than a political entity. They rarely deviated from the quest for Jewish immigration to the country and settlement on the land, but they distanced themselves from the mainstream Zionist position, which viewed the majority national home as a prelude to a state (sometimes referred to vaguely as a 'commonwealth') in which Jews would dominate demographically and politically. Their [The bi-nationalist associations'] aim was to create a solid basis for the Jewish community in the country, without making it the dominant group. [...]
Willingness to compromise on – but not necessarily abandon – basic Zionist principle served to distinguish what became known as the bi-nationalist approach from other political perspectives.
Greenstein, The Bi-nationalist Perspective in Israel/Palestine during the British Mandate, 1917-1948, Chapter 1. In: Ran Greenstein, Zionism and its Discontents: A century of radical dissent in Israel/Palestine, 2014, pp. 1-49:
"Simon rejected that [(define the solution of the Jewish problem in Palestine as the movement's goal)]. Instead he proposed an explicit renunciation of the demand for a majority, and [proposed] a statement that Zionism – the quest to create a secure basis for the Jewish people in Palestine according to international law – could be realized in a bi-national country, with no need for a Jewish majority. This would alleviate the Arab fear that Zionism was merely a scheme to take over the country and marginalize non-Jews."

In 1931 bevestigde de Zionistische Wereldorganisatie (WZO) dat haar hoofddoel was: de massale en onbeperkte joodse immigratie naar en kolonisatie van Palestina als Groot-Israël (Eretz Israel): Text of Resolution Defining Ultimate Aims of Zionism, 1931

[Albert Hourani] opposed a bi-national state, ... Even if it were possible, a bi-national state would lead to one of two things: “Either to a complete deadlock involving perhaps the intervention of foreign powers, or else to the domination of the whole life of the state by communal considerations.” Above all, Hourani said, the integrity and sincerity of Magnes were not in doubt but he spoke for “a very small section of the Jewish community in Palestine.” His scheme would satisfy his group of supporters “but it would not satisfy the vast majority of Zionists.” If a bi-national state were established, he and his group “would be swept aside and the majority of Zionists would use what Doctor Magnes had obtained for them in order to press their next demands.” Thus, he might become “the first victim of political Zionism.”". Gearchiveerd op 26 juni 2023.
The Bi-nationalist Perspective in Israel/Palestine during the British Mandate, 1917-1948, Chapter 1. Zie par. Moving towards Partition. Ran Greenstein, 2014
The Palestinian Communist Party, 1919-1948, pdf (inloggen): p. 31-33; in: Ran Greenstein, 2014, pp. 50-103.

adalah.org

The Discriminatory Laws Database. Adalah, update 25 september 2017. Gearchiveerd op 11 juni 2023.

ajcarchives.org

British Mandate: A Survey of Palestine, Chapter VI: Population, pag 144 en
American Jewish Year Book Vol. 20 (1918-1919), p. 340. via:

al-monitor.com

(en) More Israelis, Palestinians support the 'one-state' solution. AL-Monitor (13 februari 2020). Geraadpleegd op 7 augustus 2023.

archive.today

Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin: Ratification of the Israel-Palestinian Interim Agreement. Knesset, 5 oktober 1995 (gearchiveerd).
"In the framework of the permanent solution, first and foremost, the State of Israel as a Jewish state, at least 80% of whose citizens will be, and are, Jews. "

balfourproject.org

De Britse minister Balfour in 1919 over het zionistische programma en het Britse beleid, zoals Balfour zelf had voorgesteld in een memo aan de Premier:
"Palestine should be excluded from the terms of reference because the Powers had committed themselves to the Zionist programme which inevitably excluded numerical self-determination [zelfbestemming voor de Arabische meerderheid was voor de zionisten uitgesloten]. Palestine presented a unique situation. We (de Britse regering) are dealing not with the wishes of an existing community but are consciously seeking to reconstitute a new community and definitely building for a numerical majority in the future ... [We hebben niet te maken met de wensen van een bestaande gemeenschap, maar willen doelbewust een nieuwe (joodse) gemeenschap vestigen met een meerderheid in de toekomst]"
Allied policy on Palestine. Citaat uit een Brits regeringsdocument in: The Origins And Evolution Of The Palestine Problem, 1917-1947 (VN-DPR)

bbc.com

Explainer: Israel, annexation and the West Bank. BBC, 25 juni 2020

books.google.com

Greenstein, The Bi-nationalist Perspective in Israel/Palestine during the British Mandate, 1917-1948, Chapter 1. In: Ran Greenstein, Zionism and its Discontents: A century of radical dissent in Israel/Palestine, 2014, pp. 1-49:
"Simon rejected that [(define the solution of the Jewish problem in Palestine as the movement's goal)]. Instead he proposed an explicit renunciation of the demand for a majority, and [proposed] a statement that Zionism – the quest to create a secure basis for the Jewish people in Palestine according to international law – could be realized in a bi-national country, with no need for a Jewish majority. This would alleviate the Arab fear that Zionism was merely a scheme to take over the country and marginalize non-Jews."

In 1931 bevestigde de Zionistische Wereldorganisatie (WZO) dat haar hoofddoel was: de massale en onbeperkte joodse immigratie naar en kolonisatie van Palestina als Groot-Israël (Eretz Israel): Text of Resolution Defining Ultimate Aims of Zionism, 1931

[Albert Hourani] opposed a bi-national state, ... Even if it were possible, a bi-national state would lead to one of two things: “Either to a complete deadlock involving perhaps the intervention of foreign powers, or else to the domination of the whole life of the state by communal considerations.” Above all, Hourani said, the integrity and sincerity of Magnes were not in doubt but he spoke for “a very small section of the Jewish community in Palestine.” His scheme would satisfy his group of supporters “but it would not satisfy the vast majority of Zionists.” If a bi-national state were established, he and his group “would be swept aside and the majority of Zionists would use what Doctor Magnes had obtained for them in order to press their next demands.” Thus, he might become “the first victim of political Zionism.”". Gearchiveerd op 26 juni 2023.
Palestine – Divided or United? The Case for a Bi-national Palestine before the United Nations. Judah Leon Magnes voor de UNSCOP, 1947
Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice, p. 35-37. John Quigley, 1990

carnegieendowment.org

(en) The Inescapable Two-State Imperative. Carnegie Endowment (19 april 2021). Geraadpleegd op 7 augustus 2023.

cufi.org.uk

Corbyn’s two-state delusion appears to call for the destruction of Israel. Christians United for Israel, 29 juni 2018. Gearchiveerd op 23 mei 2022.

electronicintifada.net

Israel-Palestine: Time for a bi-national state. Leila Farsakh, The Electronic Intifada, 20 maart 2007. Gearchiveerd op 8 december 2022.

encyclopedia.com

bi-nationalism. Thomson Gale, Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2007

europa.eu

europarl.europa.eu

Recognise Palestine to preserve the two-state solution, says European Parliament Delegation. Europees Parlement, 23 feb 2017. Gearchiveerd.
"The Delegation witnessed the increasing feeling of hopelessness of Palestinian youth, the creeping annexation now becoming blatantly open annexation in Area C of the West Bank,"

foreignaffairs.com

(en) Israel’s One-State Reality - It’s Time to Give Up on the Two-State Solution . Foreign Affairs (14 april 2023). Geraadpleegd op 7 augustus 2023.

foreignpolicy.com

America Has a Plan. And, No, It Isn’t One That Israel Would Like. Shibley Telhami, Foreign Policy, 2 maart 2014
November-poll, Via. Gearchiveerd op 20 augustus 2022.
American Views of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict – Critical issues poll. UMCIP, sep-okt 2018
Zie: Americans Are Increasingly Critical of Israel. Shibley Telhami, Foreign Policy, 11 december 2018. Gearchiveerd op 16 mei 2023.

frontiersin.org

Annexation, normalization and the two-state solution in Israel-Palestine. Yoav Shemer-Kunz, Front. Polit. Sci., 28 apr 2023, p. 10-11 (CC BY-licentie).

haaretz.com

Which Kind of Binational State? Meron Benvenisti, Haaretz, 20 november 2003. Of hier. Gearchiveerd op 1 februari 2022.
There is such a thing as 'Israeli'. Haaretz, 5 mei 2014
"... The reasoning for rejecting the petition was that the existence of “an Israeli people” had not been legally proven, Judge Hanan Melcer noted, and “it is not proper to encourage the creation of ‘slivers’ of new peoples.” [...] it is hard not to wonder what exactly the basis was for the court’s determination that there is no such thing as an Israeli nationality [with the Population Registry’s use of the term “nationality” referring not to citizenship but rather to ethnic identity].". Gearchiveerd op 9 december 2021.
Jewish population in Israel is declining. Haaretz, 4 okt 2010. Gearchiveerd
Why Uri Avnery Opposed a One-state Solution. Haaretz, 23 aug 2018

huffingtonpost.com

What Sharia Law in Democracies Tells Us About Islam. Josh Goodman, HuffPost, 29 september 2010
The Sharia Courts. Israëlisch Ministerie van Justitie

i-p-o.org

The Palestine problem in the framework of International Law — Sovereignty as the Crucial Issue of a Peaceful Settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict. Hans Koechler, september 2000

inss.org.il

(en) Resolving the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: The Viability of One-State Models. Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) (December 2021). Geraadpleegd op 7 augustus 2023.

israelsdocuments.blogspot.com

Zie ook Weizmann's verzoek op 25 november, aan President Truman, om een aantal landen te bewerken: The Revealed and the Concealed: A Joint Exhibition with the Foreign Ministry. IsraelsDocuments.blogspot, 29 november 2015

jewishvoiceforpeace.org

nationality Law, 5712-1952

jpost.com

Jewish population at lowest percentage since founding of Israel. Jerusalem Post, 12 apr 2021
Likud pushing for annexation even in coalition with Blue and White, Labor. Jerusalem Post, 30 maart 2020

jstor.org

(en) Farsakh, Leila (Winter 2011). The One-State Solution and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Palestinian Challenges and Prospects. Middle East Journal 65 (1)
A History of the Concept of "Transfer" in Zionism. Israel Shahak, Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Spring, 1989), pp. 22-37 (jstor preview)

jta.org

Greenstein, The Bi-nationalist Perspective in Israel/Palestine during the British Mandate, 1917-1948, Chapter 1. In: Ran Greenstein, Zionism and its Discontents: A century of radical dissent in Israel/Palestine, 2014, pp. 1-49:
"Simon rejected that [(define the solution of the Jewish problem in Palestine as the movement's goal)]. Instead he proposed an explicit renunciation of the demand for a majority, and [proposed] a statement that Zionism – the quest to create a secure basis for the Jewish people in Palestine according to international law – could be realized in a bi-national country, with no need for a Jewish majority. This would alleviate the Arab fear that Zionism was merely a scheme to take over the country and marginalize non-Jews."

In 1931 bevestigde de Zionistische Wereldorganisatie (WZO) dat haar hoofddoel was: de massale en onbeperkte joodse immigratie naar en kolonisatie van Palestina als Groot-Israël (Eretz Israel): Text of Resolution Defining Ultimate Aims of Zionism, 1931

[Albert Hourani] opposed a bi-national state, ... Even if it were possible, a bi-national state would lead to one of two things: “Either to a complete deadlock involving perhaps the intervention of foreign powers, or else to the domination of the whole life of the state by communal considerations.” Above all, Hourani said, the integrity and sincerity of Magnes were not in doubt but he spoke for “a very small section of the Jewish community in Palestine.” His scheme would satisfy his group of supporters “but it would not satisfy the vast majority of Zionists.” If a bi-national state were established, he and his group “would be swept aside and the majority of Zionists would use what Doctor Magnes had obtained for them in order to press their next demands.” Thus, he might become “the first victim of political Zionism.”". Gearchiveerd op 26 juni 2023.

justice.gov.il

What Sharia Law in Democracies Tells Us About Islam. Josh Goodman, HuffPost, 29 september 2010
The Sharia Courts. Israëlisch Ministerie van Justitie

knesset.gov.il

Israël en de democratie: gelijke rechten onbespreekbaar in parlement. The Rights Forum, 7 juni 2018
Knesset Presidium disqualifies Balad proposal to legislate “Basic Law: A Country of All Its Citizens,” because it rejects Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. Knesset persbericht van 5 juni 2018. Gearchiveerd op 28 maart 2023.

mondediplo.com

A history of conflict between opposing ideals. Alain Gresh, Le Monde diplomatique, 3 oktober 2010. Gearchiveerd op 29 maart 2023.

mondoweiss.net

Israelis don’t exist. Jonathan Ofir, Mondoweiss, 25 maart 2016. Gearchiveerd op 24 januari 2023.
Roger Cohen scares his readers: ‘the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state’. Joseph Levine, Mondoweiss, 22 april 2018. Gearchiveerd op 6 september 2022.

newpol.org

Jewish Alternatives to Zionism. Bennett Muraskin, New Politics Vol. XIV No. 3 (Summer 2013); Whole Number 55. Gearchiveerd op 4 februari 2023.

nytimes.com

(en) ‘One State, Two States’ - first chapter book Benny Morris 'One State, Two States: Resolving the Israel/Palestine Conflict' . New York Times (22 mei 2009). Gearchiveerd op 3 december 2018. Geraadpleegd op 7 augustus 2023.

odspi.org

Which Kind of Binational State? Meron Benvenisti, Haaretz, 20 november 2003. Of hier. Gearchiveerd op 1 februari 2022.
The Solution of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: One or Two States?, par. VI. Creation of a democratic State.Sami Aldeeb, 8 november 2003. Samen met andere artikelen op Association for one Democratic State (niet meer actief)

pcpsr.org

Zie taartpunten-grafiek op p. 6-9 voor de keuzes uit opties; p. 16-17 voor 2 staten onder voorwaarden. De alternatieve opties werden alleen aangeboden aan de respondenten die een 2SO al hadden afgewezen (zie p. 5).
Palestinian-Israeli Pulse: A Joint Poll, juni 2018 (1,3 MB). via
Public Opinion Poll No (69), p. 2+6+7+18+20. Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), september 2018. via. Gearchiveerd op 25 oktober 2022.

rightsforum.org

Likud spreekt zich uit voor verdere annexatie Palestina. The Rights Forum, 2 jan 2018.
"… the Likud Central Committee calls on Likud’s elected leaders to work to allow unhindered construction and to extend Israeli law and sovereignty in all the areas of liberated settlement in Judea and Samaria."
Israël en de democratie: gelijke rechten onbespreekbaar in parlement. The Rights Forum, 7 juni 2018
Knesset Presidium disqualifies Balad proposal to legislate “Basic Law: A Country of All Its Citizens,” because it rejects Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. Knesset persbericht van 5 juni 2018. Gearchiveerd op 28 maart 2023.

theguardian.com

Former US ambassador accuses Israel of ‘creeping annexation’ of the West Bank. The Guardian, 24 feb 2023. Gearchiveerd

timesofisrael.com

Jews now a 47% minority in Israel and the territories, demographer says. Times of Israel, 30 aug 2022

trouw.nl

Enquête: Palestina, Israël of geen oplossing. Trouw, 25 juni 2004. Gearchiveerd op 9 april 2019.

umd.edu

sadat.umd.edu

America Has a Plan. And, No, It Isn’t One That Israel Would Like. Shibley Telhami, Foreign Policy, 2 maart 2014
November-poll, Via. Gearchiveerd op 20 augustus 2022.
American Views of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict – Critical issues poll. UMCIP, sep-okt 2018
Zie: Americans Are Increasingly Critical of Israel. Shibley Telhami, Foreign Policy, 11 december 2018. Gearchiveerd op 16 mei 2023.

unescwa.org

ESCWA Launches Report on Israeli Practices Towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid. ESCWA, 15 maart 2017
Samenvatting rapport; Hele rapport
"Israel ... has succeeded over the past decades in imposing and maintaining an apartheid regime that works on two levels. First, the political and geographic fragmentation of the Palestinian people ... Secondly, the oppression of all Palestinians through an array of laws, policies and practices that ensure domination of them by a racial group and serve to maintain the regime."

unwatch.org

VN baas, Antonió Guterres, 16 maart 2017, verwerping ESCWA rapport, beschuldiging van Israël als appartheidsstaat

web.archive.org

(en) ‘One State, Two States’ - first chapter book Benny Morris 'One State, Two States: Resolving the Israel/Palestine Conflict' . New York Times (22 mei 2009). Gearchiveerd op 3 december 2018. Geraadpleegd op 7 augustus 2023.
Which Kind of Binational State? Meron Benvenisti, Haaretz, 20 november 2003. Of hier. Gearchiveerd op 1 februari 2022.
The Discriminatory Laws Database. Adalah, update 25 september 2017. Gearchiveerd op 11 juni 2023.
Is the two-state solution in danger? Haaretz, 24 februari 2004
ESCWA Launches Report on Israeli Practices Towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid. ESCWA, 15 maart 2017
Samenvatting rapport; Hele rapport
"Israel ... has succeeded over the past decades in imposing and maintaining an apartheid regime that works on two levels. First, the political and geographic fragmentation of the Palestinian people ... Secondly, the oppression of all Palestinians through an array of laws, policies and practices that ensure domination of them by a racial group and serve to maintain the regime."
British Mandate: A Survey of Palestine, Chapter VI: Population, pag 144 en
American Jewish Year Book Vol. 20 (1918-1919), p. 340. via:
Brief van Chaim Weizmann aan Arthur Balfour, 24 januari 1919, voor de Vredesconferentie van Parijs. Weizmann beweert te spreken namens zowel de zionisten als de non-zionisten (niet de anti-zionisten!). Dit was een onwaarheid. In werkelijkheid waren de non-zionisten juist per definitie uitgesproken tegen een joodse staat, waarom zij dus geen zionisten waren. Gearchiveerd op 26 juni 2023.
UNSCOP-rapport, 3 september 1947 (A/364), Chapter II, par. 127 en 130 (pdf p. 71-72). van origineel
"The Jewish case seeks the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, and Jewish immigration into Palestine both before and after the creation of the Jewish State subject only to the limitations imposed by the economic absorptive capacity of that State. ... On the one hand, the Jewish State is needed in order to assure a refuge for the Jewish immigrants ... On the other hand, a Jewish State would have urgent need of Jewish immigrants in order to affect the present great numerical preponderance of Arabs over Jews in Palestine. The Jewish case frankly recognizes the difficulty involved in creating at the present time a Jewish State in all of Palestine in which Jews would, in fact, be only a minority, ..."
"In their view, the Mandate intended that the natural evolution of Jewish immigration, unrestricted save by economic considerations, might ultimately lead to a commonwealth in which the Jews would be a majority."
De Britse minister Balfour in 1919 over het zionistische programma en het Britse beleid, zoals Balfour zelf had voorgesteld in een memo aan de Premier:
"Palestine should be excluded from the terms of reference because the Powers had committed themselves to the Zionist programme which inevitably excluded numerical self-determination [zelfbestemming voor de Arabische meerderheid was voor de zionisten uitgesloten]. Palestine presented a unique situation. We (de Britse regering) are dealing not with the wishes of an existing community but are consciously seeking to reconstitute a new community and definitely building for a numerical majority in the future ... [We hebben niet te maken met de wensen van een bestaande gemeenschap, maar willen doelbewust een nieuwe (joodse) gemeenschap vestigen met een meerderheid in de toekomst]"
Allied policy on Palestine. Citaat uit een Brits regeringsdocument in: The Origins And Evolution Of The Palestine Problem, 1917-1947 (VN-DPR)
Jewish Alternatives to Zionism. Bennett Muraskin, New Politics Vol. XIV No. 3 (Summer 2013); Whole Number 55. Gearchiveerd op 4 februari 2023.
Greenstein, The Bi-nationalist Perspective in Israel/Palestine during the British Mandate, 1917-1948, Chapter 1. In: Ran Greenstein, Zionism and its Discontents: A century of radical dissent in Israel/Palestine, 2014, pp. 1-49:
"Simon rejected that [(define the solution of the Jewish problem in Palestine as the movement's goal)]. Instead he proposed an explicit renunciation of the demand for a majority, and [proposed] a statement that Zionism – the quest to create a secure basis for the Jewish people in Palestine according to international law – could be realized in a bi-national country, with no need for a Jewish majority. This would alleviate the Arab fear that Zionism was merely a scheme to take over the country and marginalize non-Jews."

In 1931 bevestigde de Zionistische Wereldorganisatie (WZO) dat haar hoofddoel was: de massale en onbeperkte joodse immigratie naar en kolonisatie van Palestina als Groot-Israël (Eretz Israel): Text of Resolution Defining Ultimate Aims of Zionism, 1931

[Albert Hourani] opposed a bi-national state, ... Even if it were possible, a bi-national state would lead to one of two things: “Either to a complete deadlock involving perhaps the intervention of foreign powers, or else to the domination of the whole life of the state by communal considerations.” Above all, Hourani said, the integrity and sincerity of Magnes were not in doubt but he spoke for “a very small section of the Jewish community in Palestine.” His scheme would satisfy his group of supporters “but it would not satisfy the vast majority of Zionists.” If a bi-national state were established, he and his group “would be swept aside and the majority of Zionists would use what Doctor Magnes had obtained for them in order to press their next demands.” Thus, he might become “the first victim of political Zionism.”". Gearchiveerd op 26 juni 2023.
A history of conflict between opposing ideals. Alain Gresh, Le Monde diplomatique, 3 oktober 2010. Gearchiveerd op 29 maart 2023.
United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) — Report to the General Assembly, 3 september 1947 (A/364), Chapter I, par. 75; Chapter IV, par. 8-11; Chapter V, par. 2-6; Chapter VI (p. 110) en VII (p. 136). van origineel
Report of Sub-Committee 2 to the Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian question of the UN General Assembly 1947, Chapter 3, par 84-91
Report of Sub-Committee 2, Chapter I, 11 november 1947 (A/AC.14/32). Hier het origineel
Ontwerp-resolutie. Report Sub-Committee 2, Chapter IV, 11 november 1947 (A/AC.14/32).
Zie hier de resultaten van de lobby-campagne: Vote changes from Ad hoc Committee to General Assembly
Resolution 181 (II). Future government of Palestine.
There is such a thing as 'Israeli'. Haaretz, 5 mei 2014
"... The reasoning for rejecting the petition was that the existence of “an Israeli people” had not been legally proven, Judge Hanan Melcer noted, and “it is not proper to encourage the creation of ‘slivers’ of new peoples.” [...] it is hard not to wonder what exactly the basis was for the court’s determination that there is no such thing as an Israeli nationality [with the Population Registry’s use of the term “nationality” referring not to citizenship but rather to ethnic identity].". Gearchiveerd op 9 december 2021.
Israelis don’t exist. Jonathan Ofir, Mondoweiss, 25 maart 2016. Gearchiveerd op 24 januari 2023.
Israel-Palestine: Time for a bi-national state. Leila Farsakh, The Electronic Intifada, 20 maart 2007. Gearchiveerd op 8 december 2022.
Former US ambassador accuses Israel of ‘creeping annexation’ of the West Bank. The Guardian, 24 feb 2023. Gearchiveerd
Recognise Palestine to preserve the two-state solution, says European Parliament Delegation. Europees Parlement, 23 feb 2017. Gearchiveerd.
"The Delegation witnessed the increasing feeling of hopelessness of Palestinian youth, the creeping annexation now becoming blatantly open annexation in Area C of the West Bank,"
Jewish population in Israel is declining. Haaretz, 4 okt 2010. Gearchiveerd
Truth and reconciliation. Edward Said, Al-Ahram Weekly, Issue No.412, 14-20 january 1999
(en) Lindsey Moore, Ruins, rifts and the remainder: Palestinian memoirs by Edward Said and Raja Shehadeh. Postcolonial Studies, Volume 16, 2013 - Issue 1 (22 juli 2013). Gearchiveerd op 8 juni 2024.
Enquête: Palestina, Israël of geen oplossing. Trouw, 25 juni 2004. Gearchiveerd op 9 april 2019.
Israël en de democratie: gelijke rechten onbespreekbaar in parlement. The Rights Forum, 7 juni 2018
Knesset Presidium disqualifies Balad proposal to legislate “Basic Law: A Country of All Its Citizens,” because it rejects Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. Knesset persbericht van 5 juni 2018. Gearchiveerd op 28 maart 2023.
Public Opinion Poll No (69), p. 2+6+7+18+20. Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), september 2018. via. Gearchiveerd op 25 oktober 2022.
Corbyn’s two-state delusion appears to call for the destruction of Israel. Christians United for Israel, 29 juni 2018. Gearchiveerd op 23 mei 2022.
Roger Cohen scares his readers: ‘the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state’. Joseph Levine, Mondoweiss, 22 april 2018. Gearchiveerd op 6 september 2022.
America Has a Plan. And, No, It Isn’t One That Israel Would Like. Shibley Telhami, Foreign Policy, 2 maart 2014
November-poll, Via. Gearchiveerd op 20 augustus 2022.
American Views of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict – Critical issues poll. UMCIP, sep-okt 2018
Zie: Americans Are Increasingly Critical of Israel. Shibley Telhami, Foreign Policy, 11 december 2018. Gearchiveerd op 16 mei 2023.

wikimedia.org

commons.wikimedia.org

Brief van Chaim Weizmann aan Arthur Balfour, 24 januari 1919, voor de Vredesconferentie van Parijs. Weizmann beweert te spreken namens zowel de zionisten als de non-zionisten (niet de anti-zionisten!). Dit was een onwaarheid. In werkelijkheid waren de non-zionisten juist per definitie uitgesproken tegen een joodse staat, waarom zij dus geen zionisten waren. Gearchiveerd op 26 juni 2023.

yesh-din.org

“Through the Lens of Israel's Interests”: The Civil Administration in the West Bank. Yesh din, 21 januari 2018