Intelligent design (Dutch Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Intelligent design" in Dutch language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Dutch rank

5web.archive.org

1^st place

2ncse.com

low place

1archive.org

6^th place

25^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

28^th place

1nih.gov

4^th place

12^th place

1doi.org

2^nd place

8^th place

1ugent.be

3,695^th place

89^th place

1google.nl

1,423^rd place

17^th place

1aaas.org

9,065^th place

3,541^st place

1wikipedia.org

low place

1udel.edu

4,858^th place

4,133^rd place

1nemokennislink.nl

low place

540^th place

1trouw.nl

1,527^th place

13^th place

1commonsenseatheism.com

low place

aaas.org

De Kitzmiller vs. Dover-zaak pagina 83; AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory; University of New South Wales - News: Intelligent Design is not science; National Center for Science Education: Statements from Scientific and Scholarly Organizations. Zie ook de referenties op het Engelstalige Wikipedia artikel List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design.

archive.org

(en) Boudry, Maarten & Blancke, Stefaan (2010). Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (4): 473–482. ISSN: 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. DOI: 10.1086/656904. Vrije toegang tot hele artikel

commonsenseatheism.com

(en) Luke Muehlhauser Who Designed the Designer?, maart 2011

doi.org

(en) Boudry, Maarten & Blancke, Stefaan (2010). Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (4): 473–482. ISSN: 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. DOI: 10.1086/656904. Vrije toegang tot hele artikel

google.nl

books.google.nl

Jacob Klapwijk (2009). Heeft evolutie een doel? Over schepping en emergente evolutie. Uitgeverij Kok, Kampen, pp. 25. ISBN 9789043516563. Gearchiveerd op 8 augustus 2023.

ncse.com

De Kitzmiller vs. Dover-zaak pagina 83; AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory; University of New South Wales - News: Intelligent Design is not science; National Center for Science Education: Statements from Scientific and Scholarly Organizations. Zie ook de referenties op het Engelstalige Wikipedia artikel List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design.
Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al. (400 F. Supp. 2d 707, Docket no. 4cv2688). "For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the religious nature of ID would be readily apparent to an objective observer, adult or child."

nemokennislink.nl

Minister ontvangt boek over ID op nemokennislink.nl, waarin de weblog wordt geciteerd. Gearchiveerd op 28 november 2022.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

(en) Boudry, Maarten & Blancke, Stefaan (2010). Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (4): 473–482. ISSN: 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. DOI: 10.1086/656904. Vrije toegang tot hele artikel

trouw.nl

Everard De Jong, Katholiek kan best leven met Darwin. Trouw (4 maart 2009).

udel.edu

John H. McDonald: A reducibly complex mousetrap. Gearchiveerd op 5 augustus 2023.

ugent.be

biblio.ugent.be

(en) Boudry, Maarten & Blancke, Stefaan (2010). Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (4): 473–482. ISSN: 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. DOI: 10.1086/656904. Vrije toegang tot hele artikel

web.archive.org

Jacob Klapwijk (2009). Heeft evolutie een doel? Over schepping en emergente evolutie. Uitgeverij Kok, Kampen, pp. 25. ISBN 9789043516563. Gearchiveerd op 8 augustus 2023.
De Kitzmiller vs. Dover-zaak pagina 83; AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory; University of New South Wales - News: Intelligent Design is not science; National Center for Science Education: Statements from Scientific and Scholarly Organizations. Zie ook de referenties op het Engelstalige Wikipedia artikel List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design.
John H. McDonald: A reducibly complex mousetrap. Gearchiveerd op 5 augustus 2023.
Minister ontvangt boek over ID op nemokennislink.nl, waarin de weblog wordt geciteerd. Gearchiveerd op 28 november 2022.
L.C. Palm, Creationisme, Intelligent Design en Protestantisme. protestant.nu (11-12-2012). Gearchiveerd op 16-2-2018. Geraadpleegd op 2-5-2019.

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

De Kitzmiller vs. Dover-zaak pagina 83; AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory; University of New South Wales - News: Intelligent Design is not science; National Center for Science Education: Statements from Scientific and Scholarly Organizations. Zie ook de referenties op het Engelstalige Wikipedia artikel List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design.

worldcat.org

(en) Boudry, Maarten & Blancke, Stefaan (2010). Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (4): 473–482. ISSN: 0033-5770. PMID 21243965. DOI: 10.1086/656904. Vrije toegang tot hele artikel