Select Committee on Economic Affairs, Government Response to the Economics of Climate Change Report. House of Lords (28 november 2005). Gearchiveerd op 21 september 2020. Geraadpleegd op 8 november 2019. "We noted evidence from Professor Paul Reiter of the Institut Pasteur in Paris, which strongly disputed the IPCC’s arguments on the likely spread of malaria as a result of warming (paragraph 32). This is unconvincing. Professor Paul Reiter’s evidence does not accurately represent the current scientific debate on the potential impacts of climate change on health in general, or malaria in particular. He appears to have been quite selective in the references and reports that he has criticised, focusing on those that are neither very recent nor reflective of the current state of knowledge, now or when they were published."
Het groene denken Trouw, 20 april 2007: De film The Great Global Warming Swindle neemt stelling tegen de menselijke broeikashypothese, zoals die door het Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change en veel mainstream-klimatologen wordt aangehangen.
Select Committee on Economic Affairs, Government Response to the Economics of Climate Change Report. House of Lords (28 november 2005). Gearchiveerd op 21 september 2020. Geraadpleegd op 8 november 2019. "We noted evidence from Professor Paul Reiter of the Institut Pasteur in Paris, which strongly disputed the IPCC’s arguments on the likely spread of malaria as a result of warming (paragraph 32). This is unconvincing. Professor Paul Reiter’s evidence does not accurately represent the current scientific debate on the potential impacts of climate change on health in general, or malaria in particular. He appears to have been quite selective in the references and reports that he has criticised, focusing on those that are neither very recent nor reflective of the current state of knowledge, now or when they were published."
