Observer bias (Dutch Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Observer bias" in Dutch language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Dutch rank

1^st place

6^th place

25^th place

1,226^th place

337^th place

2^nd place

8^th place

archive.org

(en) Douglas Mook (1 mei 2001). Psychological Research: The Ideas Behind the Methods. W. W. Norton & Company, New York. ISBN 9780393976205.

(en) A. Hróbjartsson, A.S.S. Thomsen, F. Emanuelsson, B. Tendal, J. Hilden, I. Boutron, et al. (27 februari 2012). Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ 2012 (344). DOI:10.1136/bmj.e1119. "On average, non-blinded assessors of subjective binary outcomes generated substantially biased effect estimates in randomised clinical trials, exaggerating odds ratios by 36%."

(en) A. Hróbjartsson, A.S.S. Thomsen, F. Emanuelsson, B. Tendal, J. Hilden, I. Boutron, et al. (27 februari 2012). Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ 2012 (344). DOI:10.1136/bmj.e1119. "On average, non-blinded assessors of subjective binary outcomes generated substantially biased effect estimates in randomised clinical trials, exaggerating odds ratios by 36%."

D. Bijl (1 maart 2013). 'Observer bias': invloed op de uitkomsten van gerandomiseerd onderzoek. Gearchiveerd op 25 december 2014. Geneesmiddelenbulletin 47 (2): 22-23 "De validiteit van dergelijk onderzoek kan echter worden bedreigd doordat bepalingen van uitkomstmaten systematisch kunnen afwijken van de werkelijkheid vanwege vooringenomenheid bij beoordelaars, door onder meer hoop of verwachtingen."