AnnikaBjörkdahl (1. september 2018). «Republika Srpska: Imaginary, performance and spatialization». Political Geography (på engelsk). 66: 34–43. ISSN0962-6298. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.07.005. Besøkt 12. april 2021. «Already in 1992 the RS leadership sat out to establish a capital, a key requisite of state. A plan was announced for a ‘Serbian Sarajevo’, consisting of the parts of the city under its control and it was declared in the constitution as the capital of RS. This RS capital would form a counterpoint to what they called ‘Muslim Sarajevo’. ‘Serbian Sarajevo’ never became a thriving capital of RS yet the East part of Sarajevo retains explicit claims to separate cityhood (Jansen, 2013).7 Instead, state institutions were eventually set up in the de facto capital Banja Luka where the headquarters of most of the institutions of government still are placed.»
AnnikaBjörkdahl (1. september 2018). «Republika Srpska: Imaginary, performance and spatialization». Political Geography (på engelsk). 66: 34–43. ISSN0962-6298. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.07.005. Besøkt 12. april 2021. «Already in 1992 the RS leadership sat out to establish a capital, a key requisite of state. A plan was announced for a ‘Serbian Sarajevo’, consisting of the parts of the city under its control and it was declared in the constitution as the capital of RS. This RS capital would form a counterpoint to what they called ‘Muslim Sarajevo’. ‘Serbian Sarajevo’ never became a thriving capital of RS yet the East part of Sarajevo retains explicit claims to separate cityhood (Jansen, 2013).7 Instead, state institutions were eventually set up in the de facto capital Banja Luka where the headquarters of most of the institutions of government still are placed.»
AnnikaBjörkdahl (1. september 2018). «Republika Srpska: Imaginary, performance and spatialization». Political Geography (på engelsk). 66: 34–43. ISSN0962-6298. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.07.005. Besøkt 12. april 2021. «Already in 1992 the RS leadership sat out to establish a capital, a key requisite of state. A plan was announced for a ‘Serbian Sarajevo’, consisting of the parts of the city under its control and it was declared in the constitution as the capital of RS. This RS capital would form a counterpoint to what they called ‘Muslim Sarajevo’. ‘Serbian Sarajevo’ never became a thriving capital of RS yet the East part of Sarajevo retains explicit claims to separate cityhood (Jansen, 2013).7 Instead, state institutions were eventually set up in the de facto capital Banja Luka where the headquarters of most of the institutions of government still are placed.»
