Rotblat, J. (mai 1955). «The Hydrogen-Uranium Bomb». Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 5 (på engelsk). 11: 171–172. ISSN0096-3402. doi:10.1080/00963402.1955.11453597. Besøkt 1. januar 2024. «In the following article a British physicist speculates on the composition and possible radiological effects of the superbomb tested in the Pacific last spring. He concludes that it “is a kind of cobalt bomb; in some respects, it is even worse.”»
«Sir Joseph Rotblat». The Independent (på engelsk). 1. september 2005. Besøkt 31. desember 2023. «Looking at the evidence, Rotblat deduced that the bomb had been a three-stage weapon in which the essential fusion reaction was not only initiated by a fission explosion, but was followed by one as well. This meant that it was vastly more "dirty" than the public had been told, and when Rotblat after some delay published this fact there was uproar.»
jstor.org
Kraft, A. (2018). Dissenting Scientists in Early ColdWar Britain: The “Fallout” Controversy and the Origins of Pugwash, 1954–1957. Journal of Cold War Studies, 20(1), 58–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26925761
Rotblat, J. (mai 1955). «The Hydrogen-Uranium Bomb». Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 5 (på engelsk). 11: 171–172. ISSN0096-3402. doi:10.1080/00963402.1955.11453597. Besøkt 1. januar 2024. «In the following article a British physicist speculates on the composition and possible radiological effects of the superbomb tested in the Pacific last spring. He concludes that it “is a kind of cobalt bomb; in some respects, it is even worse.”»
Rotblat, J. (mai 1955). «The Hydrogen-Uranium Bomb». Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 5 (på engelsk). 11: 171–172. ISSN0096-3402. doi:10.1080/00963402.1955.11453597. Besøkt 1. januar 2024. «In the following article a British physicist speculates on the composition and possible radiological effects of the superbomb tested in the Pacific last spring. He concludes that it “is a kind of cobalt bomb; in some respects, it is even worse.”»
