Berkowitz, Roger (2014). Stangneth, Bettina, red. «Did Eichmann Think?». The Good Society. 2. 23: 193–205. ISSN1089-0017. doi:10.5325/goodsociety.23.2.0193. Besøkt 8. april 2021. «Arendt clearly rejects Eichmann’s portrayal of himself while on trial in Jerusalem as a mere cog in the Nazi machinery or as a humble bureaucrat simply following orders. The common misperception that Arendt thought Eichmann was either merely a bureaucrat following orders or simply a cog mindlessly carrying out his duties emerges largely from a conflation of Arendt’s conclusions with those of Stanley Milgram.»
Berkowitz, Roger (2014). Stangneth, Bettina, red. «Did Eichmann Think?». The Good Society. 2. 23: 193–205. ISSN1089-0017. doi:10.5325/goodsociety.23.2.0193. Besøkt 8. april 2021. «Arendt clearly rejects Eichmann’s portrayal of himself while on trial in Jerusalem as a mere cog in the Nazi machinery or as a humble bureaucrat simply following orders. The common misperception that Arendt thought Eichmann was either merely a bureaucrat following orders or simply a cog mindlessly carrying out his duties emerges largely from a conflation of Arendt’s conclusions with those of Stanley Milgram.»
Laqueur, Walter (11. november 1965). «Footnotes to the Holocaust». New York Review of Books (på engelsk). ISSN0028-7504. Besøkt 12. oktober 2021. «The author of the present book clearly thinks that Miss Arendt did not have that essential minimum of factual knowledge. Dr. Robinson’s own credentials are formidable; an eminent authority on international law, he brings great erudition, a knowledge of many languages, and an unrivalled mastery of the sources to this full-scale attempt to refute Miss Arendt.»
Arendt, Hannah (20. januar 1966). «"The Formidable Dr. Robinson": A Reply». New York Review of Books (på engelsk). ISSN0028-7504. Besøkt 12. oktober 2021. «Reviewing Robinson’s “full-scale attempt to refute” my report of the Eichmann trial, Mr. Laqueur was so overwhelmed by his author’s “eminent authority” that he thought it superfluous to acquaint himself with the subject under attack. He accepts Mr. Robinson’s basic distortion, contained in the subtitle of his book, “The Jewish Catastrophe and Hannah Arendt’s Narrative,” which implies that I recounted part of “Jewish contemporary history,” while in fact I have criticized the prosecution for taking the Eichmann Trial as a pretext for doing just that»
Brogaard, Berit (31. mars 2019). «Origin of Evil». Psychology Today (på engelsk). Besøkt 2. april 2021.
snl.no
Aavitsland, Vilde Lid (14. oktober 2020). «Hannah Arendt». Store norske leksikon. Besøkt 26. mai 2021.
theguardian.com
Evans, Richard J. (17. oktober 2014). «Eichmann Before Jerusalem: The Unexamined Life of a Mass Murderer – review». The Guardian (på engelsk). ISSN0261-3077. Besøkt 12. april 2020. «In the conversations he had with Sassen and others, Eichmann was completely unrepentant about the extermination of the Jews, which he saw as historically necessary, a policy he was proud to have carried out in the interests of Germany. The cynicism, inhumanity, lack of pity and moral self‑deception of the conversations are breathtaking. This is a very disturbing book, and every now and then, as you read it, you have to pause in disbelief. Ten years and more after the war's end, Eichmann's lack of realism, typical for a political exile, even persuaded him that he could make a comeback, or that nazism could be rehabilitated, and he planned to launch a public defence of what he saw as its achievements.»
Evans, Richard J. (17. oktober 2014). «Eichmann Before Jerusalem: The Unexamined Life of a Mass Murderer – review». The Guardian (på engelsk). ISSN0261-3077. Besøkt 12. april 2020. «In the conversations he had with Sassen and others, Eichmann was completely unrepentant about the extermination of the Jews, which he saw as historically necessary, a policy he was proud to have carried out in the interests of Germany. The cynicism, inhumanity, lack of pity and moral self‑deception of the conversations are breathtaking. This is a very disturbing book, and every now and then, as you read it, you have to pause in disbelief. Ten years and more after the war's end, Eichmann's lack of realism, typical for a political exile, even persuaded him that he could make a comeback, or that nazism could be rehabilitated, and he planned to launch a public defence of what he saw as its achievements.»
Berkowitz, Roger (2014). Stangneth, Bettina, red. «Did Eichmann Think?». The Good Society. 2. 23: 193–205. ISSN1089-0017. doi:10.5325/goodsociety.23.2.0193. Besøkt 8. april 2021. «Arendt clearly rejects Eichmann’s portrayal of himself while on trial in Jerusalem as a mere cog in the Nazi machinery or as a humble bureaucrat simply following orders. The common misperception that Arendt thought Eichmann was either merely a bureaucrat following orders or simply a cog mindlessly carrying out his duties emerges largely from a conflation of Arendt’s conclusions with those of Stanley Milgram.»
Laqueur, Walter (11. november 1965). «Footnotes to the Holocaust». New York Review of Books (på engelsk). ISSN0028-7504. Besøkt 12. oktober 2021. «The author of the present book clearly thinks that Miss Arendt did not have that essential minimum of factual knowledge. Dr. Robinson’s own credentials are formidable; an eminent authority on international law, he brings great erudition, a knowledge of many languages, and an unrivalled mastery of the sources to this full-scale attempt to refute Miss Arendt.»
Arendt, Hannah (20. januar 1966). «"The Formidable Dr. Robinson": A Reply». New York Review of Books (på engelsk). ISSN0028-7504. Besøkt 12. oktober 2021. «Reviewing Robinson’s “full-scale attempt to refute” my report of the Eichmann trial, Mr. Laqueur was so overwhelmed by his author’s “eminent authority” that he thought it superfluous to acquaint himself with the subject under attack. He accepts Mr. Robinson’s basic distortion, contained in the subtitle of his book, “The Jewish Catastrophe and Hannah Arendt’s Narrative,” which implies that I recounted part of “Jewish contemporary history,” while in fact I have criticized the prosecution for taking the Eichmann Trial as a pretext for doing just that»