Stone, Dan (1. desember 2005). «Raphael Lemkin on the Holocaust». Journal of Genocide Research. 4. 7: 539–550. ISSN1462-3528. doi:10.1080/14623520500349985. Besøkt 20. februar 2021. «In his Thoughts on Nazi Genocide this insistence on law led Lemkin to overemphasize the importance of Hans Frank, leading Nazi lawyer and later General Governor of Poland (the General Government was the part of central Poland occupied by Germany but not incorporated into the Reich). The space that Lemkin devoted to Frank is understandable in terms of Lemkin's legal approach, but does not accurately reflect Frank's (comparative lack of) importance in the regime, especially where Jewish policy was concerned.»
Pedersen, Willy (23. november 2018). «Tiltalebenk i helvete». morgenbladet.no. Besøkt 23. desember 2020. «Den britiske juristen Philippe Sands har skrevet en uforglemmelig fortelling om nazistenes krigsforbrytelser og arbeidet for å håndtere dem i rettssalen.»
Ford, Catherine (29. mai 2020). «Unravelling a troubling Nazi legacy». The Sydney Morning Herald (på engelsk). Besøkt 12. desember 2020. «In Lviv, or Lemberg as his grandfather knew it, Sands came into the orbit of Hans Frank's son, Niklas, with whom he discussed their unimaginably bleak connection and Niklas' book, about the burden shouldered by the son of a mass murderer. The meeting produced an unlikely friendship, and a web of connections.»
Sands, Philippe (22. mai 2016). «How the Nuremberg trials found names for the Nazis' crimes». The Guardian (på engelsk). ISSN0261-3077. Besøkt 9. august 2020. «In studying these materials, Lemkin found a pattern of behaviour to which he gave a label, to describe the crime with which Frank could be charged. He called it ‘genocide’. Unlike Lauterpacht, with his focus on crimes against humanity, which aimed at the protection of individuals, he was more concerned with the protection of groups. He had worked tirelessly to get the crime of genocide into Frank’s trial, but on this last day of the trial he was too unwell to attend.»
«Our fathers the Nazis: film explores the legacy of atrocities». the Guardian (på engelsk). 19. november 2015. Besøkt 19. februar 2021. «Niklas Frank, now 76 and a retired journalist, was seven when his father was hanged by the allies after the Nuremberg trials. He has denounced his father and says he does not regret the execution.»
«East West Street by Philippe Sands review – putting genocide into words». the Guardian (på engelsk). 22. mai 2016. Besøkt 19. februar 2021. «At Treblinka, the death camp the Nazis tried to bury, he sees the stamp of Hans Frank’s general government, which had jurisdiction over Lemberg as well as Treblinka, alongside that of the camp commandant, Franz Stangl. It is “a black sign, indelible and definitive as to the matter of responsibility”. Sands’s portrait of Frank, the lawyer who went wrong, and his trial at Nuremberg supply the final powerful strand of this narrative. Frank’s son, Niklas, became Sands’s friend during the research, and along with Horst, the son of Otto Von Wächter – governor of Galicia and thus the man immediately in charge of the final solution in Lemberg – was the subject of Sands’s film, My Nazi Legacy.»
Hjeltnes, Guri (8. oktober 2018). «Fabelaktig og gripende om andre verdenskrig: Bokanmeldelse: Philippe Sands: «Tilbake til Lemberg»». www.vg.no. Besøkt 19. februar 2021. «Noen sakprosabøker skiller seg rett og slett ut. For en historie, for et grep det er tatt i «Tilbake til Lemberg», og for en forfatter Philippe Sands er! Philippe Sands har regnet ut at bestefarens store familie på mors- og farssiden i Lemberg og Zólkiew talte 70 mennesker før andre verdenskrig. Bare bestefaren Leon overlevde, og omkranset sin fortid med taushet.»
Sylte, Turid (17. september 2020). «Betydningen av oppgjøret». Vårt Land - Norges største kristne dagsavis (på norsk). Besøkt 12. desember 2020. «Sands ble kjent med ham gjennom Hans Franks sønn, Niklas, som er tysk journalist. Frank ga klart uttrykk for sin holdning. Selv om han er imot dødsstraff, var dødsdommen mot faren på sin plass.»
Sands, Philippe (22. mai 2016). «How the Nuremberg trials found names for the Nazis' crimes». The Guardian (på engelsk). ISSN0261-3077. Besøkt 9. august 2020. «In studying these materials, Lemkin found a pattern of behaviour to which he gave a label, to describe the crime with which Frank could be charged. He called it ‘genocide’. Unlike Lauterpacht, with his focus on crimes against humanity, which aimed at the protection of individuals, he was more concerned with the protection of groups. He had worked tirelessly to get the crime of genocide into Frank’s trial, but on this last day of the trial he was too unwell to attend.»
Stone, Dan (1. desember 2005). «Raphael Lemkin on the Holocaust». Journal of Genocide Research. 4. 7: 539–550. ISSN1462-3528. doi:10.1080/14623520500349985. Besøkt 20. februar 2021. «In his Thoughts on Nazi Genocide this insistence on law led Lemkin to overemphasize the importance of Hans Frank, leading Nazi lawyer and later General Governor of Poland (the General Government was the part of central Poland occupied by Germany but not incorporated into the Reich). The space that Lemkin devoted to Frank is understandable in terms of Lemkin's legal approach, but does not accurately reflect Frank's (comparative lack of) importance in the regime, especially where Jewish policy was concerned.»
