Human Rights Service (Norwegian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Human Rights Service" in Norwegian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Norwegian rank
2nd place
9th place
5th place
13th place
1,677th place
6th place
low place
1,783rd place
667th place
5th place
low place
2,578th place
low place
155th place
low place
658th place
849th place
2nd place
222nd place
262nd place
507th place
472nd place

dagbladet.no

doi.org

  • Bangstad, Sindre; Helland, Frode (3. oktober 2019). «The rhetoric of Islamophobia: an analysis of the means of persuasion in Hege Storhaug’s writings on Islam and Muslims». Ethnic and Racial Studies. 13. 42: 2229–2247. ISSN 0141-9870. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1615630. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «Few actors have had a greater impact on the “framing of Muslims” as a social and political “problem” in Norway since 2001 than Hege Storhaug of the government- and corporate billionaire funded civil society organization Human Rights Service (HRS). … Thon has for a number of years provided Storhaug and the HRS office space free of charge. … After Breivik’s terrorist attacks, the HRS’ links with Fjordman and Bawer had become so embarrassing for Storhaug that she now made the – in light of her actual record non-sensical claim that – she had “never been interested in the Eurabia theory”» 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (1. juli 2013). «Eurabia Comes to Norway». Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations. 3. 24: 369–391. ISSN 0959-6410. doi:10.1080/09596410.2013.783969. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «Storhaug, a former newspaper reporter, established the NGO Human Rights Service (HRS) in Oslo in 2001 (Fekete 2009, 93). State subvention for the HRS was initially secured through a special state budgetary allocation initiated by the PP under the Bondevik II Government (2001–5). Storhaug and HRS has since its very inception maintained a close relationship with the populist right-wing PP in Norway, acting as consultants to the PP's Parliamentary Caucus Commission on Immigration and Integration's Report in 2007 (see acknowledgements in Fremskrittspartiet 2007, 1) and for speeches by PP MP Christian Tybring-Gjedde (see Tybring-Gjedde's own admission of input from HRS for a virulently anti-Muslim speech he gave to the PP's national caucus in 2010 in Verdens Gang, May 13, 2011).» 
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika (1. februar 2014). «Hate Speech and Dialogue in Norway: Muslims ‘Speak Back’». Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2. 40: 230–248. ISSN 1369-183X. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.851473. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «However, the HRS's website consists solely of ‘cases’ of Muslim abuses and its message to the general public is that Muslims are unable to share democratic values, implying that they may not be able to integrate.4 Storhaug's colleague in the HRS, Jens Anfindsen, published a document on the Internet in 2007, where he argued that Norway is being ‘Islamised’ through the policy of multiculturalism and proposed that Norwegians» 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (2016). «Norwegian Right-Wing Discourses: Extremism Post-Utøya». I Pratt, Douglas. Fear of Muslims? International Perspectives on Islamophobia (engelsk). Springer International Publishing. s. 231–250. ISBN 978-3-319-29698-2. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29698-2_14. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «HRS has long acted in an advisory capacity to the PP’s parliamentary caucus, and has strong links with Lars Hedegaard and Helle Marie Brix of the International Free Press Society (IFPS) in Denmark, as well as with the Swedish Democrats in Sweden. The HRS website www.rights.no regularly reproduces texts in the Eurabia genre. Bawer, who translated a number of Storhaug’s pamphlets on immigration, integration, Islam and Muslims into English, was employed as a text writer for HRS between 2009 and 2011.» 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (2013). «Inclusion and exclusion in the mediated public sphere: the case of Norway and its Muslims». Social Anthropology. 3 (engelsk). 21: 356–370. ISSN 1469-8676. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12034. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «he Norwegian secular feminist activist, ‘Eurabia’‐propagandist and former newspaper reporter at the tabloid Dagbladet , Hege Storhaug of the state‐subvened and openly anti‐Muslim Human Rights' Service [HRS] furiously declared that Rana was an ‘Islamist’ seeking to introduce shari'a (‘Islamic law’) in Norway» 
  • Razack, Sherene H. (1. oktober 2004). «Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages». Feminist Legal Studies. 2 (engelsk). 12: 129–174. ISSN 1572-8455. doi:10.1023/B:FEST.0000043305.66172.92. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (juli 2013). «Eurabia Comes to Norway». Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations. 3 (engelsk). 24: 369–391. ISSN 0959-6410. doi:10.1080/09596410.2013.783969. Besøkt 4. november 2022. 
  • Fekete, Liz (1. oktober 2006). «Enlightened fundamentalism? Immigration, feminism and the Right». Race & Class. 2 (engelsk). 48: 1–22. ISSN 0306-3968. doi:10.1177/0306396806069519. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «Under the guise of concern about forced marriage, the HRS has fuelled an argument for stricter immigration controls. In Human Visas, HRS’s information director Hege Storhaug generalised about cultural traits within immigrant communities, building, it would seem, on earlier research into ninety instances of forced marriage in which she found that, in all but three cases, the bride had been raped.48 On the untested presumption that marriage is only a pretext for more immigration from such communities, she legitimated her call for immigration controls. Storhaug’s research methods have been criticised as unethical and several interviewees have come forward and stated that, under pressure from Storhaug, they had exaggerated their stories.49» 

filternyheter.no

fritanke.no

nrk.no

snl.no

tandfonline.com

vl.no

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

worldcat.org

  • Bangstad, Sindre; Helland, Frode (3. oktober 2019). «The rhetoric of Islamophobia: an analysis of the means of persuasion in Hege Storhaug’s writings on Islam and Muslims». Ethnic and Racial Studies. 13. 42: 2229–2247. ISSN 0141-9870. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1615630. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «Few actors have had a greater impact on the “framing of Muslims” as a social and political “problem” in Norway since 2001 than Hege Storhaug of the government- and corporate billionaire funded civil society organization Human Rights Service (HRS). … Thon has for a number of years provided Storhaug and the HRS office space free of charge. … After Breivik’s terrorist attacks, the HRS’ links with Fjordman and Bawer had become so embarrassing for Storhaug that she now made the – in light of her actual record non-sensical claim that – she had “never been interested in the Eurabia theory”» 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (1. juli 2013). «Eurabia Comes to Norway». Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations. 3. 24: 369–391. ISSN 0959-6410. doi:10.1080/09596410.2013.783969. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «Storhaug, a former newspaper reporter, established the NGO Human Rights Service (HRS) in Oslo in 2001 (Fekete 2009, 93). State subvention for the HRS was initially secured through a special state budgetary allocation initiated by the PP under the Bondevik II Government (2001–5). Storhaug and HRS has since its very inception maintained a close relationship with the populist right-wing PP in Norway, acting as consultants to the PP's Parliamentary Caucus Commission on Immigration and Integration's Report in 2007 (see acknowledgements in Fremskrittspartiet 2007, 1) and for speeches by PP MP Christian Tybring-Gjedde (see Tybring-Gjedde's own admission of input from HRS for a virulently anti-Muslim speech he gave to the PP's national caucus in 2010 in Verdens Gang, May 13, 2011).» 
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika (1. februar 2014). «Hate Speech and Dialogue in Norway: Muslims ‘Speak Back’». Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2. 40: 230–248. ISSN 1369-183X. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.851473. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «However, the HRS's website consists solely of ‘cases’ of Muslim abuses and its message to the general public is that Muslims are unable to share democratic values, implying that they may not be able to integrate.4 Storhaug's colleague in the HRS, Jens Anfindsen, published a document on the Internet in 2007, where he argued that Norway is being ‘Islamised’ through the policy of multiculturalism and proposed that Norwegians» 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (2013). «Inclusion and exclusion in the mediated public sphere: the case of Norway and its Muslims». Social Anthropology. 3 (engelsk). 21: 356–370. ISSN 1469-8676. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12034. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «he Norwegian secular feminist activist, ‘Eurabia’‐propagandist and former newspaper reporter at the tabloid Dagbladet , Hege Storhaug of the state‐subvened and openly anti‐Muslim Human Rights' Service [HRS] furiously declared that Rana was an ‘Islamist’ seeking to introduce shari'a (‘Islamic law’) in Norway» 
  • Razack, Sherene H. (1. oktober 2004). «Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages». Feminist Legal Studies. 2 (engelsk). 12: 129–174. ISSN 1572-8455. doi:10.1023/B:FEST.0000043305.66172.92. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. 
  • Bangstad, Sindre (juli 2013). «Eurabia Comes to Norway». Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations. 3 (engelsk). 24: 369–391. ISSN 0959-6410. doi:10.1080/09596410.2013.783969. Besøkt 4. november 2022. 
  • Fekete, Liz (1. oktober 2006). «Enlightened fundamentalism? Immigration, feminism and the Right». Race & Class. 2 (engelsk). 48: 1–22. ISSN 0306-3968. doi:10.1177/0306396806069519. Besøkt 21. mai 2020. «Under the guise of concern about forced marriage, the HRS has fuelled an argument for stricter immigration controls. In Human Visas, HRS’s information director Hege Storhaug generalised about cultural traits within immigrant communities, building, it would seem, on earlier research into ninety instances of forced marriage in which she found that, in all but three cases, the bride had been raped.48 On the untested presumption that marriage is only a pretext for more immigration from such communities, she legitimated her call for immigration controls. Storhaug’s research methods have been criticised as unethical and several interviewees have come forward and stated that, under pressure from Storhaug, they had exaggerated their stories.49» 

xn--bodposten-n8a.no