Mannsrettighetsbevegelsen (Norwegian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Mannsrettighetsbevegelsen" in Norwegian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Norwegian rank
3rd place
36th place
2nd place
9th place
2,003rd place
3,545th place
low place
5,034th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
456th place
1,709th place
6th place
42nd place
26th place
107th place
5,158th place
low place
1,948th place
4,849th place
699th place
968th place

archive.org

  • Williams, Rhys H. (1995). «Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources». Social Problems. 42 (1): 134–135. JSTOR 3097008. doi:10.2307/3097008. «Another example of contractual model rhetoric is in the language of the Men's Rights movement. As a countermovement to the feminist movement, it has concentrated on areas generally thought of as family law—especially divorce and child custody laws. The movement charges that maternal preference in child custody decisions is an example of gender prejudice, with men the ones who are systematically disadvantaged... Men's Rights groups... have adopted much of the rhetoric of the early liberal feminist movement... Similarly, along with the appeal to "equal rights for fathers"... the Men's Rights movement also uses a rhetoric of children's "needs"... The needs rhetoric helps offset charges that their rights language is motivated by self-interest alone.» 

books.google.com

doi.org

  • Mills, Martin (2003). «Shaping the boys' agenda: the backlash blockbusters». International Journal of Inclusive Education. 7 (1): 57–73. doi:10.1080/13603110210143644. 
  • Williams, Rhys H. (1995). «Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources». Social Problems. 42 (1): 134–135. JSTOR 3097008. doi:10.2307/3097008. «Another example of contractual model rhetoric is in the language of the Men's Rights movement. As a countermovement to the feminist movement, it has concentrated on areas generally thought of as family law—especially divorce and child custody laws. The movement charges that maternal preference in child custody decisions is an example of gender prejudice, with men the ones who are systematically disadvantaged... Men's Rights groups... have adopted much of the rhetoric of the early liberal feminist movement... Similarly, along with the appeal to "equal rights for fathers"... the Men's Rights movement also uses a rhetoric of children's "needs"... The needs rhetoric helps offset charges that their rights language is motivated by self-interest alone.» 
  • Ruzankina, E.A. (2010). «Men's movements and male subjectivity». Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia. 49 (1): 8–16. doi:10.2753/aae1061-1959490101. 

humanist.no

jhu.edu

muse.jhu.edu

jstor.org

  • Williams, Rhys H. (1995). «Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources». Social Problems. 42 (1): 134–135. JSTOR 3097008. doi:10.2307/3097008. «Another example of contractual model rhetoric is in the language of the Men's Rights movement. As a countermovement to the feminist movement, it has concentrated on areas generally thought of as family law—especially divorce and child custody laws. The movement charges that maternal preference in child custody decisions is an example of gender prejudice, with men the ones who are systematically disadvantaged... Men's Rights groups... have adopted much of the rhetoric of the early liberal feminist movement... Similarly, along with the appeal to "equal rights for fathers"... the Men's Rights movement also uses a rhetoric of children's "needs"... The needs rhetoric helps offset charges that their rights language is motivated by self-interest alone.» 

newcastle.edu.au

newrepublic.com

salon.com

splcenter.org

theweek.co.uk

web.archive.org