The petition project (Norwegian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "The petition project" in Norwegian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Norwegian rank

10worldcat.org

5^th place

13^th place

9doi.org

2^nd place

9^th place

3nb.no

1,595^th place

3^rd place

2sciencedirect.com

149^th place

236^th place

2nih.gov

4^th place

23^rd place

1petitionproject.org

low place

1ieee.org

652^nd place

1,558^th place

1plos.org

2,112^th place

1,475^th place

1newyorker.com

146^th place

443^rd place

1azcentral.com

814^th place

low place

1fivethirtyeight.com

2,031^st place

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

33^rd place

1cnbc.com

220^th place

689^th place

1ntnu.no

7,215^th place

158^th place

1bbc.com

20^th place

44^th place

1forbes.com

54^th place

189^th place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

35^th place

1newscientist.com

774^th place

298^th place

1wiley.com

222^nd place

262^nd place

1an.no

low place

218^th place

1abcnyheter.no

low place

63^rd place

abcnyheter.no

Lene Johansen / ABC Nyheter (1. juni 2008). «Klimakrisen er avlyst». ABC Nyheter. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.

an.no

«Arnfinn Wiksaas og «the petition project»». an.no. 6. august 2021.

azcentral.com

Hinkle, Jeannette. «Trump to be honored by deniers of human-caused climate-change in Tucson». The Arizona Republic (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

bbc.com

Ortiz, Diego Arguedas (14. november 2018). «Could this be the cure for fake news?». www.bbc.com (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

cnbc.com

Schwartz, Brian (2. desember 2019). «Wealthy Mercer family spent millions on conservative causes in 2018 as they distanced themselves from Trump». CNBC (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

doi.org

Schmid-Petri, Hannah; Bürger, Moritz (22. september 2021). «The effect of misinformation and inoculation: Replication of an experiment on the effect of false experts in the context of climate change communication». Public Understanding of Science (engelsk): 09636625211024550. ISSN 0963-6625. doi:10.1177/09636625211024550. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.
Williams, Matt N.; Bond, Christina M. C. (1. august 2020). «A preregistered replication of “Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change”». Journal of Environmental Psychology (engelsk). 70: 101456. ISSN 0272-4944. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101456. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021. «A notable example of misinformation about climate change is the “Oregon petition”—a petition arguing that there is no evidence that greenhouse gas emissions could cause disruption to the Earth's climate (“Global warming petition project,” n.d.). The petition claims to have over 31,000 signatories—although the summary of signatories by qualification on the petition website indicates that just 39 of these signatories have a formal educational qualification in climatology.»
Lahsen, Myanna (juni 2020). «Should AI be Designed to Save Us From Ourselves?: Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability». IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 2. 39: 60–67. ISSN 1937-416X. doi:10.1109/MTS.2020.2991502. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.
Cook, John; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H. (5. mai 2017). «Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence». PLOS ONE. 5 (engelsk). 12: e0175799. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5419564 . PMID 28475576. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)
Nakajima, Nina (1. oktober 2001). «Green Advertising and Green Public Relations as Integration Propaganda». Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 5 (engelsk). 21: 334–348. ISSN 0270-4676. doi:10.1177/027046760102100502. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.
Lavik, Trygve (26. oktober 2016). «Climate change denial, freedom of speech and global justice». Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics. 2 (engelsk): 75–90. ISSN 1890-4009. doi:10.5324/eip.v10i2.1923. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. «The Oregon petition was long ago exposed as a fraud. Most of the signers were not scientists at all, and many of them did not know that their names were on the list. Despite this, the Oregon petition is still very much alive (Monbiot 2006: 29-31). The Oregon petition is one example of the so-called “denial industry”.»
Lewandowsky, Stephan; van der Linden, Sander (3. juli 2021). «Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking». European Review of Social Psychology. 2. 32: 348–384. ISSN 1046-3283. doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. «One potent online climate misinformation campaign is the “Global Warming Petition Project” (Cook et al., 2018). The petition engendered a viral misinformation story on social media in 2016 claiming that “tens of thousands of scientists have declared global warming a hoax” (Readfearn, 2016). In actuality, the petition was meaningless. The list contains no affiliations, making verification of signatories problematic (e.g., Charles Darwin and the Spice Girls were among the signatories; van der Linden, Leiserowitz, et al., 2017). .... Although the petition has been debunked repeatedly, it continues to sow confusion. In a national probability sample of the United States population, van der Linden, Leiserowitz, et al. (2017) found that amongst a wide range of fake claims, Americans were most persuaded by the debunked Oregon petition.»
Linden, Sander van der; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Rosenthal, Seth; Maibach, Edward (2017). «Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change». Global Challenges. 2. 1: 1600008. ISSN 2056-6646. PMC 6607159 . PMID 31565263. doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Cook, John (1. desember 2017). «Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era». Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4 (engelsk). 6: 353–369. ISSN 2211-3681. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

fivethirtyeight.com

Engber, Daniel (12. oktober 2017). «The Grandfather Of Alt-Science». FiveThirtyEight (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

forbes.com

Walton, Alice G. (23. januar 2017). «'Psychological Vaccine' May Protect Against Fake News, Alternative Facts». Forbes (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

ieee.org

ieeexplore.ieee.org

Lahsen, Myanna (juni 2020). «Should AI be Designed to Save Us From Ourselves?: Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability». IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 2. 39: 60–67. ISSN 1937-416X. doi:10.1109/MTS.2020.2991502. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.

nb.no

urn.nb.no

Såkalte miljøbiler. Rogalands Avis 2007.09.08. s. 23.
Klima og miljø. Fiskeribladet Fiskaren 2010.02.03. s. 19.
Klimabløffen. Harstad Tidende 2015.08.10. s. 14.

newscientist.com

Marshall, Michael Le Page and Michael (14. desember 2009). «Deniergate: Turning the tables on climate sceptics». New Scientist (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

newyorker.com

Nast, Condé (17. mars 2017). «The Reclusive Hedge-Fund Tycoon Behind the Trump Presidency». The New Yorker (engelsk). Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Cook, John; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H. (5. mai 2017). «Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence». PLOS ONE. 5 (engelsk). 12: e0175799. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5419564 . PMID 28475576. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)
Linden, Sander van der; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Rosenthal, Seth; Maibach, Edward (2017). «Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change». Global Challenges. 2. 1: 1600008. ISSN 2056-6646. PMC 6607159 . PMID 31565263. doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)

ntnu.no

Lavik, Trygve (26. oktober 2016). «Climate change denial, freedom of speech and global justice». Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics. 2 (engelsk): 75–90. ISSN 1890-4009. doi:10.5324/eip.v10i2.1923. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. «The Oregon petition was long ago exposed as a fraud. Most of the signers were not scientists at all, and many of them did not know that their names were on the list. Despite this, the Oregon petition is still very much alive (Monbiot 2006: 29-31). The Oregon petition is one example of the so-called “denial industry”.»

nytimes.com

Pogrebin, Robin (17. januar 2017). «Museum Trustee, a Trump Donor, Supports Groups That Deny Climate Change». The New York Times (engelsk). ISSN 0362-4331. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

petitionproject.org

The petition project

plos.org

journals.plos.org

Cook, John; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H. (5. mai 2017). «Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence». PLOS ONE. 5 (engelsk). 12: e0175799. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5419564 . PMID 28475576. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)

sciencedirect.com

Williams, Matt N.; Bond, Christina M. C. (1. august 2020). «A preregistered replication of “Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change”». Journal of Environmental Psychology (engelsk). 70: 101456. ISSN 0272-4944. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101456. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021. «A notable example of misinformation about climate change is the “Oregon petition”—a petition arguing that there is no evidence that greenhouse gas emissions could cause disruption to the Earth's climate (“Global warming petition project,” n.d.). The petition claims to have over 31,000 signatories—although the summary of signatories by qualification on the petition website indicates that just 39 of these signatories have a formal educational qualification in climatology.»
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Cook, John (1. desember 2017). «Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era». Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4 (engelsk). 6: 353–369. ISSN 2211-3681. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.

theguardian.com

«Doubt over climate science is a product with an industry behind it | Graham Readfearn». the Guardian (engelsk). 5. mars 2015. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Linden, Sander van der; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Rosenthal, Seth; Maibach, Edward (2017). «Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change». Global Challenges. 2. 1: 1600008. ISSN 2056-6646. PMC 6607159 . PMID 31565263. doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)

worldcat.org

Schmid-Petri, Hannah; Bürger, Moritz (22. september 2021). «The effect of misinformation and inoculation: Replication of an experiment on the effect of false experts in the context of climate change communication». Public Understanding of Science (engelsk): 09636625211024550. ISSN 0963-6625. doi:10.1177/09636625211024550. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.
Williams, Matt N.; Bond, Christina M. C. (1. august 2020). «A preregistered replication of “Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change”». Journal of Environmental Psychology (engelsk). 70: 101456. ISSN 0272-4944. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101456. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021. «A notable example of misinformation about climate change is the “Oregon petition”—a petition arguing that there is no evidence that greenhouse gas emissions could cause disruption to the Earth's climate (“Global warming petition project,” n.d.). The petition claims to have over 31,000 signatories—although the summary of signatories by qualification on the petition website indicates that just 39 of these signatories have a formal educational qualification in climatology.»
Lahsen, Myanna (juni 2020). «Should AI be Designed to Save Us From Ourselves?: Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability». IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 2. 39: 60–67. ISSN 1937-416X. doi:10.1109/MTS.2020.2991502. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.
Cook, John; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H. (5. mai 2017). «Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence». PLOS ONE. 5 (engelsk). 12: e0175799. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5419564 . PMID 28475576. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)
Pogrebin, Robin (17. januar 2017). «Museum Trustee, a Trump Donor, Supports Groups That Deny Climate Change». The New York Times (engelsk). ISSN 0362-4331. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.
Nakajima, Nina (1. oktober 2001). «Green Advertising and Green Public Relations as Integration Propaganda». Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 5 (engelsk). 21: 334–348. ISSN 0270-4676. doi:10.1177/027046760102100502. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.
Lavik, Trygve (26. oktober 2016). «Climate change denial, freedom of speech and global justice». Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics. 2 (engelsk): 75–90. ISSN 1890-4009. doi:10.5324/eip.v10i2.1923. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. «The Oregon petition was long ago exposed as a fraud. Most of the signers were not scientists at all, and many of them did not know that their names were on the list. Despite this, the Oregon petition is still very much alive (Monbiot 2006: 29-31). The Oregon petition is one example of the so-called “denial industry”.»
Lewandowsky, Stephan; van der Linden, Sander (3. juli 2021). «Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking». European Review of Social Psychology. 2. 32: 348–384. ISSN 1046-3283. doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. «One potent online climate misinformation campaign is the “Global Warming Petition Project” (Cook et al., 2018). The petition engendered a viral misinformation story on social media in 2016 claiming that “tens of thousands of scientists have declared global warming a hoax” (Readfearn, 2016). In actuality, the petition was meaningless. The list contains no affiliations, making verification of signatories problematic (e.g., Charles Darwin and the Spice Girls were among the signatories; van der Linden, Leiserowitz, et al., 2017). .... Although the petition has been debunked repeatedly, it continues to sow confusion. In a national probability sample of the United States population, van der Linden, Leiserowitz, et al. (2017) found that amongst a wide range of fake claims, Americans were most persuaded by the debunked Oregon petition.»
Linden, Sander van der; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Rosenthal, Seth; Maibach, Edward (2017). «Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change». Global Challenges. 2. 1: 1600008. ISSN 2056-6646. PMC 6607159 . PMID 31565263. doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. CS1-vedlikehold: PMC-format (link)
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Cook, John (1. desember 2017). «Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era». Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4 (engelsk). 6: 353–369. ISSN 2211-3681. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021.