Thor Heyerdahl (Norwegian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Thor Heyerdahl" in Norwegian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Norwegian rank
1st place
1st place
9,737th place
4,150th place
low place
2,293rd place
667th place
5th place
1,779th place
7th place
26th place
107th place
774th place
298th place
222nd place
262nd place
1,293rd place
829th place
1,322nd place
48th place
2,995th place
72nd place
104th place
101st place
low place
313th place
1,622nd place
455th place
low place
155th place
low place
low place
2,613th place
27th place
low place
2,166th place
12th place
35th place
234th place
369th place
low place
61st place
low place
3,617th place
1,177th place
4th place
low place
2,870th place
36th place
119th place
low place
2,181st place
low place
low place
9,485th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,012th place
782nd place
1,325th place
low place
58th place

aftenposten.no

azer.com

brockhaus.de

canterbury.ac.nz

geol.canterbury.ac.nz

cgiar.org

forskning.no

geni.com

hanahou.com

  • Alison Clare Steingold (august–september 2008). «The Uber Tuber». Hana Hou!, Vol. 11, No. 4, s. 2). Arkivert fra originalen . Besøkt 11. september 2014. 

heyerdahl-institute.no

independent.co.uk

isabart.org

cs.isabart.org

  • Kunstarkivet, abART person-ID 78975, besøkt 1. april 2021[Hentet fra Wikidata]

jstor.org

  • Force, Roland W. (1959). «[uten navn]». American Anthropologist. 61 (4): 708-710.  «Though it purports to convey scientific facts, it is in fact an adventure story»
  • Smith, Marian W. (1958). «The Enigma of Easter Island». The Geographical Journal. 124 (3): 384-386.  «Heyerdahl's success has been achieved by rigorous attention to primary sources, that is, by sound application of anthropological method. But, as the same review indicates, his historical hypothesis goes beyond his data and because of some of its implications may receive what must seem to the non-anthropologist to be unreasonably violent repudiation. [...] Scientists are glad to accept Heyerdahl's facts and willing to revise their theories accordingly. But they are highly sceptical, and frankly suspicious, of that bearded redhead in the background. Such a theory needs more than the usual burden of proof to carry conviction.»

kon-tiki.no

nature.com

newscientist.com

novus.no

op.no

oslo.kommune.no

ordforeren.oslo.kommune.no

plosbiology.org

pnas.org

rederi.no

skepsis.no

snl.no

snl.no

nbl.snl.no

sweetpotatoknowledge.org

theguardian.com

ucla.edu

botgard.ucla.edu

uio.no

apollon.uio.no

unesco.org

vg.no

vl.no

web.archive.org

wikidata-externalid-url.toolforge.org

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com