Elton, Lars; dagsavisen.no (28. april 2017). «Det er ikke er hevnlyst som er grunnen til at jeg ikke er like imponert denne gangen.». Dagsavisen(norsk). Besøkt 20. september 2022. «Sand penslet ut offiserene klart inspirert av Krøyers «Hip hip hurra! Kunstnerfest på Skagen» (1888). Det var sterkt, ikke minst fordi Sand gjorde en bevisst historieforfalskning ved å fremstille utryddelsesplanleggerne i en lystig sommeridyll selv om den historiske konferansen foregikk i januar 1942.»
Zukier, Henri (1. desember 2013). «Diversity and Design: The “Twisted Road” and the Regional Turn in Holocaust History». Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 3 (engelsk). 27: 387–410. ISSN8756-6583. doi:10.1093/hgs/dct057. Besøkt 18. november 2019. ««The metaphor of the “twisted road” plausibly refuted the then-dominant first-generation intentionalist accounts of a “straight-and-narrow” trajectory of the Holocaust. Lucy S. Dawidowicz, for instance, had written of the “line of antisemitic descent from Martin Luther to Adolf Hitler,” and Gerald Fleming had emphasized that “the line that leads” from Hitler's early antisemitism to the Final Solution was “direct,” with a “striking” and “unbroken” continuity.28 The “twisted road” metaphor, by contrast, suggested that diversity was a process and a major cause of anti-Jewish policies. Most significantly, however, the new trope framed a paradigm of diversity that has tacitly and spuriously informed all sides of the debates on Holocaust intentionality. The metaphor set up a dichotomy between a “twisted” and a “straight-and-narrow” road to the Final Solution.»
Kulka, Otto Dov (2017). Jasch, Hans-Christian; Christoph, Kreuttzmüller, red. «Foreword». The Participants: The Men of the Wannsee Conference (1 utg.). Berghahn Books: xi–xix. ISBN978-1-78533-671-3. doi:10.2307/j.ctvw0498r.4.
Gerlach, Christian (1998). «The Wannsee Conference, the Fate of German Jews, and Hitler's Decision in Principle to Exterminate All European Jews». The Journal of Modern History. 4. 70: 759–812. ISSN0022-2801. doi:10.1086/235167. Besøkt 18. november 2019. «“The most remarkable thing about the meeting at Wannsee (which was not called the ‘Wannsee Conference’ until after the war) is that we do not know why it took place.” So wrote the celebrated German historian Eberhard Jackel in 1992. … Since we still know too little about the central planning for the extermination of the Jews, the relative significance of the Wannsee meeting is difficult to gauge.»
Jäckel, E. (2019). On the purpose of the Wannsee conference. In James S Pacy & Alan Wertheimer (red): Perspectives on the Holocaust. Essays in Honor of Raul Hilberghttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429301513 (pp. 39-49). Routledge.
George C. Browder (2013). «Hitler's Hangman: The Life of Heydrich, Robert Gerwarth». Holocaust and Genocide Studies. doi:10.1093/hgs/dct005. Besøkt 2. februar 2022. «Benefiting from several generations of distance, the availability of probably every surviving piece of relevant evidence, the scholarly syntheses that emerged from debates over the origins of the Holocaust, and the more recent, sophisticated insights from Taterforschung, Robert Gerwarth has given us what probably will be the definitive study of the man.»
Lipner, Sandra (29. april 2022). «Wannsee: The Road to the Final Solution». German History. 3. 40: 461–462. ISSN0266-3554. doi:10.1093/gerhis/ghac025. Besøkt 15. september 2022. «Longerich’s reading expands his argument that the Wannsee minutes ‘provide a snapshot of a stage reached in a process in the course of which the SS leadership had shifted its perspective away from the idea of a post-war “final solution” to the new aim of implementing ever more stages of the “Final Solution” during the war’ (Holocaust, p. 309).»
Brenden, Jo E. (20. november 2016). «Sand popper opp i kulturhuset». Hamar Dagblad(norsk). Besøkt 20. september 2022. «– Jeg brukte maleriske grep og teknikker for å vise sider ved andre verdenskrig som ikke filmen eller litteraturen kan. For eksempel har jeg brukt impresjonisme, som vi vanligvis oppfatter som noe idyllisk og vakkert og harmonisk, til å skildre ondskap [Sand].»
Gerlach, Christian (1998). «The Wannsee Conference, the Fate of German Jews, and Hitler's Decision in Principle to Exterminate All European Jews». The Journal of Modern History. 4. 70: 759–812. ISSN0022-2801. doi:10.1086/235167. Besøkt 18. november 2019. «“The most remarkable thing about the meeting at Wannsee (which was not called the ‘Wannsee Conference’ until after the war) is that we do not know why it took place.” So wrote the celebrated German historian Eberhard Jackel in 1992. … Since we still know too little about the central planning for the extermination of the Jews, the relative significance of the Wannsee meeting is difficult to gauge.»
Zukier, Henri (1. desember 2013). «Diversity and Design: The “Twisted Road” and the Regional Turn in Holocaust History». Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 3 (engelsk). 27: 387–410. ISSN8756-6583. doi:10.1093/hgs/dct057. Besøkt 18. november 2019. ««The metaphor of the “twisted road” plausibly refuted the then-dominant first-generation intentionalist accounts of a “straight-and-narrow” trajectory of the Holocaust. Lucy S. Dawidowicz, for instance, had written of the “line of antisemitic descent from Martin Luther to Adolf Hitler,” and Gerald Fleming had emphasized that “the line that leads” from Hitler's early antisemitism to the Final Solution was “direct,” with a “striking” and “unbroken” continuity.28 The “twisted road” metaphor, by contrast, suggested that diversity was a process and a major cause of anti-Jewish policies. Most significantly, however, the new trope framed a paradigm of diversity that has tacitly and spuriously informed all sides of the debates on Holocaust intentionality. The metaphor set up a dichotomy between a “twisted” and a “straight-and-narrow” road to the Final Solution.»
George C. Browder (2013). «Hitler's Hangman: The Life of Heydrich, Robert Gerwarth». Holocaust and Genocide Studies. doi:10.1093/hgs/dct005. Besøkt 2. februar 2022. «Benefiting from several generations of distance, the availability of probably every surviving piece of relevant evidence, the scholarly syntheses that emerged from debates over the origins of the Holocaust, and the more recent, sophisticated insights from Taterforschung, Robert Gerwarth has given us what probably will be the definitive study of the man.»
paul-mommertz.de
Paul Mommertz. «Werkeverzeichnis». www.paul-mommertz.de. Besøkt 4. januar 2022.
riskommunal.net
root.riskommunal.net
Program med innhold Besøkt 7. oktober 2012 "Ein Schauspiel von Paul Mommertz. | Inszenierung im Rahmen der Landesausstellung "Wert des Lebens"."
Solonari, V. (2002). From silence to justification?: Moldovan historians on the holocaust of bessarabian and transnistrian jews. Nationalities Papers, 30(3), 435-457. «Mass murder of local Jews accompanied the “liberation” of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina in 1941 by Romanian and German troops. Most remaining Jews were incarcerated in ghettos and concentration camps and deported to Transnistria by the Romanian authorities, where about half of them died. In addition, the Romanians liquidated at least 130,000 Jews from Transnistria between 1941 and 1944, which brought the total number killed outright or dead through inhumane treatment to some 250,000. This makes Transnistria one of the worst sites of the Holocaust in Europe, and Romania’s contribution to this tragedy quite outstanding.»
taz.de
Gryglewski, Marcus (17. januar 2020). «NS-Täterin auf der Wannseekonferenz: Eichmanns Sekretärin». Die Tageszeitung: taz(tysk). ISSN0931-9085. Besøkt 12. september 2022. «15 Männer besprachen auf der Wannsee-Konferenz 1942 die „Endlösung“. Jetzt gerät eine Frau in den Fokus: die Stenografin Ingeburg Werlemann.»
theguardian.com
Ascherson, Neal (22. mai 2004). «Observer review: The Origins of the Final Solution by Christopher Browning». The Observer(engelsk). ISSN0029-7712. Besøkt 17. november 2019. «Browning shows that this is wrong. The decisive impulse was not defeat but the euphoria of victory in Russia, in the summer of 1941. It was the sense that they were invincible which persuaded the Nazis that the genocide of Soviet Jews, which they were already carrying out, could be extended to the Jews of every nation they controlled.»
Snyder, Timothy (16. september 2015). «Hitler’s world may not be so far away | Timothy Snyder». The Guardian(engelsk). ISSN0261-3077. Besøkt 19. mai 2019. «It was this double assault upon state institutions in the Baltic states and eastern Poland, at first by the Soviet Union and then by Nazi Germany, that created the special field of experimentation where ideas of a Final Solution became the practice of mass murder. The Germans found political allies among antisemites and people who wished to restore statehood or undo the humiliation of national defeat. They found pragmatic allies, and these were likely more numerous, among people who wished to shift the burden of their own prior collaboration with the Soviets upon the Jewish minority. The Germans also found that they themselves, far more than their leaders expected, were capable of shooting Jews in cold blood. Not only the Einsatzgruppen but German police and soldiers killed Jews in huge mass shootings over pits.»
Roseman, Mark (5. januar 2002). «Cognac and genocide». the Guardian(engelsk). Besøkt 16. september 2022.
ushmm.org
encyclopedia.ushmm.org
«The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia». encyclopedia.ushmm.org(engelsk). Besøkt 11. februar 2020. «The partition of Czechoslovakia in 1938–1939 determined the fate of its Jews during World War II. After the breakup of Czechoslovakia, approximately 118,310 persons defined as Jews lived in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. Before 1941, approximately 26,000 Jews were able to emigrate.»
«Wannsee Protocol». encyclopedia.ushmm.org(engelsk). Besøkt 1. januar 2022.
Zukier, Henri (1. desember 2013). «Diversity and Design: The “Twisted Road” and the Regional Turn in Holocaust History». Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 3 (engelsk). 27: 387–410. ISSN8756-6583. doi:10.1093/hgs/dct057. Besøkt 18. november 2019. ««The metaphor of the “twisted road” plausibly refuted the then-dominant first-generation intentionalist accounts of a “straight-and-narrow” trajectory of the Holocaust. Lucy S. Dawidowicz, for instance, had written of the “line of antisemitic descent from Martin Luther to Adolf Hitler,” and Gerald Fleming had emphasized that “the line that leads” from Hitler's early antisemitism to the Final Solution was “direct,” with a “striking” and “unbroken” continuity.28 The “twisted road” metaphor, by contrast, suggested that diversity was a process and a major cause of anti-Jewish policies. Most significantly, however, the new trope framed a paradigm of diversity that has tacitly and spuriously informed all sides of the debates on Holocaust intentionality. The metaphor set up a dichotomy between a “twisted” and a “straight-and-narrow” road to the Final Solution.»
Ascherson, Neal (22. mai 2004). «Observer review: The Origins of the Final Solution by Christopher Browning». The Observer(engelsk). ISSN0029-7712. Besøkt 17. november 2019. «Browning shows that this is wrong. The decisive impulse was not defeat but the euphoria of victory in Russia, in the summer of 1941. It was the sense that they were invincible which persuaded the Nazis that the genocide of Soviet Jews, which they were already carrying out, could be extended to the Jews of every nation they controlled.»
Snyder, Timothy (16. september 2015). «Hitler’s world may not be so far away | Timothy Snyder». The Guardian(engelsk). ISSN0261-3077. Besøkt 19. mai 2019. «It was this double assault upon state institutions in the Baltic states and eastern Poland, at first by the Soviet Union and then by Nazi Germany, that created the special field of experimentation where ideas of a Final Solution became the practice of mass murder. The Germans found political allies among antisemites and people who wished to restore statehood or undo the humiliation of national defeat. They found pragmatic allies, and these were likely more numerous, among people who wished to shift the burden of their own prior collaboration with the Soviets upon the Jewish minority. The Germans also found that they themselves, far more than their leaders expected, were capable of shooting Jews in cold blood. Not only the Einsatzgruppen but German police and soldiers killed Jews in huge mass shootings over pits.»
Gerlach, Christian (1998). «The Wannsee Conference, the Fate of German Jews, and Hitler's Decision in Principle to Exterminate All European Jews». The Journal of Modern History. 4. 70: 759–812. ISSN0022-2801. doi:10.1086/235167. Besøkt 18. november 2019. «“The most remarkable thing about the meeting at Wannsee (which was not called the ‘Wannsee Conference’ until after the war) is that we do not know why it took place.” So wrote the celebrated German historian Eberhard Jackel in 1992. … Since we still know too little about the central planning for the extermination of the Jews, the relative significance of the Wannsee meeting is difficult to gauge.»
Gryglewski, Marcus (17. januar 2020). «NS-Täterin auf der Wannseekonferenz: Eichmanns Sekretärin». Die Tageszeitung: taz(tysk). ISSN0931-9085. Besøkt 12. september 2022. «15 Männer besprachen auf der Wannsee-Konferenz 1942 die „Endlösung“. Jetzt gerät eine Frau in den Fokus: die Stenografin Ingeburg Werlemann.»
Lipner, Sandra (29. april 2022). «Wannsee: The Road to the Final Solution». German History. 3. 40: 461–462. ISSN0266-3554. doi:10.1093/gerhis/ghac025. Besøkt 15. september 2022. «Longerich’s reading expands his argument that the Wannsee minutes ‘provide a snapshot of a stage reached in a process in the course of which the SS leadership had shifted its perspective away from the idea of a post-war “final solution” to the new aim of implementing ever more stages of the “Final Solution” during the war’ (Holocaust, p. 309).»
