Center for Open Science (Polish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Center for Open Science" in Polish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Polish rank

4osf.io

7,153^rd place

low place

3doi.org

2^nd place

6^th place

2cos.io

low place

2centerforopenscience.org

low place

2archive.today

14^th place

2,392^nd place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2nih.gov

4^th place

7^th place

1docs.google.com

1,047^th place

925^th place

1fastgrants.org

low place

1einsteinfoundation.de

low place

1nature.com

234^th place

204^th place

1keele.ac.uk

low place

1virginia.edu

1,041^st place

2,661^st place

archive.today

Reproducibility Initiative Receives $1.3M Grant to Validate 50 Landmark Cancer Studies. [dostęp 2015-01-29]. [zarchiwizowane z tego adresu (2015-01-29)].
Fast Grants. Fast Grants. [dostęp 2023-05-21]. [zarchiwizowane z tego adresu (2021-12-23)]. (ang.).

centerforopenscience.org

Center for Open Science. [dostęp 2013-07-11].
Reproducibility Initiative Receives $1.3M Grant to Validate 50 Landmark Cancer Studies. [dostęp 2015-01-29]. [zarchiwizowane z tego adresu (2015-01-29)].

cos.io

Our Sponsors. cos.io. [dostęp 2017-03-16]. (ang.).
A Brief History of COS 2013-2017. cos.io. [dostęp 2017-03-16]. (ang.).

docs.google.com

Center for Open Science. Business Plan, styczeń 2013. [dostęp 2013-07-11].

doi.org

dx.doi.org

ChristopherCh. Anderson ChristopherCh., Do normative scientific practices and incentive structures produce a biased body of research evidence?, OSF, 2022, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EZCUJ .
Open Science Collaboration, Estimating the reproducibility of Psychological Science, „Science”, 6251, 349, 2015, aac4716, DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716, PMID: 26315443 .

doi.org

Ed Yong. Replication studies: Bad copy. „Nature”. 485 (7398), s. 298–300, 16 May 2012. DOI: 10.1038/485298a. PMID: 22596136. [zarchiwizowane z adresu].

einsteinfoundation.de

Einstein Foundation Award Recipients and Finalists: Center for Open Science. Einstein Foundation Berlin. [dostęp 2023-05-10].

fastgrants.org

Fast Grants. Fast Grants. [dostęp 2023-05-21]. [zarchiwizowane z tego adresu (2021-12-23)]. (ang.).

keele.ac.uk

eprints.keele.ac.uk

Open Science Collaboration, Estimating the reproducibility of Psychological Science, „Science”, 6251, 349, 2015, aac4716, DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716, PMID: 26315443 .

nature.com

Ed Yong. Replication studies: Bad copy. „Nature”. 485 (7398), s. 298–300, 16 May 2012. DOI: 10.1038/485298a. PMID: 22596136. [zarchiwizowane z adresu].

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ed Yong. Replication studies: Bad copy. „Nature”. 485 (7398), s. 298–300, 16 May 2012. DOI: 10.1038/485298a. PMID: 22596136. [zarchiwizowane z adresu].
Open Science Collaboration, Estimating the reproducibility of Psychological Science, „Science”, 6251, 349, 2015, aac4716, DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716, PMID: 26315443 .

osf.io

OSF | Home. osf.io. [dostęp 2017-04-01]. (ang.).
ChristopherCh. Anderson ChristopherCh., Do normative scientific practices and incentive structures produce a biased body of research evidence?, OSF, 2022, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EZCUJ .
OSF Preprints. cos.io. [dostęp 2018-03-27]. (ang.).
Search preprints. osf.io. [dostęp 2021-02-26]. [zarchiwizowane z tego adresu (2017-02-14)].

virginia.edu

news.virginia.edu

Jane Kelly: Psychology Professor Releases Free, Open-Source, Preprint Software. UVA Today, 8 December 2016. [dostęp 2018-07-16]. (ang.).

web.archive.org

Ed Yong. Replication studies: Bad copy. „Nature”. 485 (7398), s. 298–300, 16 May 2012. DOI: 10.1038/485298a. PMID: 22596136. [zarchiwizowane z adresu].
Search preprints. osf.io. [dostęp 2021-02-26]. [zarchiwizowane z tego adresu (2017-02-14)].