Wywiad ustrukturyzowany (Polish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Wywiad ustrukturyzowany" in Polish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Polish rank

2^nd place

6^th place

5^th place

2^nd place

222^nd place

228^th place

228^th place

997^th place

6,973^rd place

149^th place

1,220^th place

1,025^th place

2,656^th place

65^th place

apa.org

Nathan R.N.R. Kuncel Nathan R.N.R. i inni, Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: A meta-analysis., „Journal of Applied Psychology”, 98 (6), 2013, s. 1060–1072, DOI: 10.1037/a0034156, ISSN 1939-1854 [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).

Cynthia KayC.K. Stevens Cynthia KayC.K., Structure interviews to recruit and hire the best people., [w:] Edwin A.E.A. Locke (red.), Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior: Indispensable Knowledge for Evidence‐Based Management, s. 41-56, DOI: 10.1002/9781119206422 .
Don C.D.C. Zhang Don C.D.C., Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment, „Journal of Business and Psychology”, 37 (1), 2022, s. 215–233, DOI: 10.1007/s10869-021-09740-9, ISSN 1573-353X [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).
ScottS. Highhouse ScottS., Christopher D.Ch.D. Nye Christopher D.Ch.D., Don C.D.C. Zhang Don C.D.C., Dark Motives and Elective Use of Brainteaser Interview Questions: Dark Motives, „Applied Psychology”, 68 (2), 2019, s. 311–340, DOI: 10.1111/apps.12163 [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).
Paul E.P.E. Meehl Paul E.P.E., Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence., 1954, DOI: 10.1037/11281-000 [dostęp 2023-06-24] .
Nathan R.N.R. Kuncel Nathan R.N.R. i inni, Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: A meta-analysis., „Journal of Applied Psychology”, 98 (6), 2013, s. 1060–1072, DOI: 10.1037/a0034156, ISSN 1939-1854 [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).

Cyrkot, T., Gawęda, Ł., Szczepanowski, R., Wywiad ustrukturyzowany w ocenie zaburzeń psychotycznych na przykładzie kwestionariusza SANS i SAPS, „Psychologiczne Zeszyty Naukowe. Półrocznik Instytutu Psychologii Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego”, 2016, nr 2 http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-d21371e1-2815-4d6e-b2eb-57e0fb798ce6

DanielD. Kahneman DanielD., Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym [online], 2012 (pol.).

AdamA. Pasick AdamA., Google Finally Admits That Its Infamous Brainteasers Were Completely Useless for Hiring [online], The Atlantic, 20 czerwca 2013 [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).

ScottS. Highhouse ScottS., Christopher D.Ch.D. Nye Christopher D.Ch.D., Don C.D.C. Zhang Don C.D.C., Dark Motives and Elective Use of Brainteaser Interview Questions: Dark Motives, „Applied Psychology”, 68 (2), 2019, s. 311–340, DOI: 10.1111/apps.12163 [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).

Don C.D.C. Zhang Don C.D.C., Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment, „Journal of Business and Psychology”, 37 (1), 2022, s. 215–233, DOI: 10.1007/s10869-021-09740-9, ISSN 1573-353X [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).
Nathan R.N.R. Kuncel Nathan R.N.R. i inni, Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: A meta-analysis., „Journal of Applied Psychology”, 98 (6), 2013, s. 1060–1072, DOI: 10.1037/a0034156, ISSN 1939-1854 [dostęp 2023-06-24] (ang.).