Bongbong Marcos (Portuguese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Bongbong Marcos" in Portuguese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Portuguese rank

9inquirer.net

437^th place

2,631^st place

3rappler.com

874^th place

5,289^th place

2scmp.com

362^nd place

807^th place

2reuters.com

49^th place

88^th place

2washingtonpost.com

34^th place

86^th place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

2doi.org

2^nd place

4^th place

1smh.com.au

132^nd place

270^th place

1npr.org

92^nd place

225^th place

1globo.com

62^nd place

2^nd place

1uol.com.br

74^th place

3^rd place

1biznewsasia.com

low place

1gmanetwork.com

824^th place

4,577^th place

1abs-cbn.com

528^th place

3,395^th place

1google.com.br

622^nd place

10^th place

1upi.com

290^th place

682^nd place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1cnnphilippines.com

2,993^rd place

low place

1nikkei.com

211^th place

3,971^st place

1r7.com

1,567^th place

26^th place

1philstar.com

563^rd place

3,443^rd place

1cmfr-phil.org

low place

1facebook.com

77^th place

141^st place

1archive.ph

756^th place

162^nd place

1bloomberg.com

99^th place

191^st place

abs-cbn.com

news.abs-cbn.com

A romance that began with deception; news.abs-cbn.com

archive.ph

«Enrile apologizes to Martial Law victims, blames 'unlucid intervals' …». archive.ph. 31 de outubro de 2018. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

biznewsasia.com

BizNewsAsia. «Bongbong Marcos: His track record». biznewsasia.com (em inglês). Consultado em 17 de janeiro de 2023

bloomberg.com

«Philippines' Marcos Tests Positive for Covid-19». Bloomberg.com (em inglês). 8 de julho de 2022. Consultado em 17 de janeiro de 2023

cmfr-phil.org

March 10, CMFR Staff Posted on:; 2016; March 10, 5:46 am Updated on:; 2016; Am, 6:44 (10 de março de 2016). «EDSA People Power: Inadequate Challenge to Marcos Revisionism». CMFR (em inglês). Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

cnnphilippines.com

https://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2021/12/9/LIST-Bongbong-Marcos-petitions-2022-bid-Comelec.html

doi.org

Chaikin, David; Sharman, J. C. (2009). Chaikin, David; Sharman, J. C., eds. «The Marcos Kleptocracy». New York: Palgrave Macmillan US (em inglês): 153–186. ISBN 978-0-230-62245-6. doi:10.1057/9780230622456_7. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

dx.doi.org

Chaikin, David; Sharman, J. C. (2009). Chaikin, David; Sharman, J. C., eds. «The Marcos Kleptocracy». New York: Palgrave Macmillan US (em inglês): 153–186. ISBN 978-0-230-62245-6. doi:10.1057/9780230622456_7. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

facebook.com

«UP Departamento ng Kasaysayan - Statement of the UP History Department: "MALAKAS AT MAGANDA: Marcos Reign, Myth-Making and Deception in History" Matakot sa kasaysayan pagkat walang lihim itong di nahahayag. (Fear history for it respects no secrets.) --Gregoria de Jesus, Lakambini ng Katipunan The darkness of dictatorship descended upon the Philippines when Ferdinand E. Marcos declared martial law in 1972 and the dictator ruled the nation with impunity. Great danger now lurks behind a deceptive nostalgia for a past that never really existed--that the Marcos years were a period of peace and prosperity. This is patently Marcos myth and deception. Under martial law, the country was plunged into a climate of repression and plunder and then into a social crisis that exploded in the 1980s. Marcos myth-making and deception are not new. Martial law itself was set up by grand deception. Marcos raised the Red scare to justify martial rule, but the communist movement then was still in its infancy; it was in fact under martial law that the communist and Moro rebellions grew in leaps and bounds. Marcos claimed to break up an old oligarchy, but martial law instead created a new type under his control, a crony oligarchy. Marcos also couched his dictatorship in deceptive legalese--"constitutional authoritarianism," but it only served his yearning for perpetuity in power. The fact is martial law rudely preempted the 1971 constitutional convention, which sought to prohibit Marcos from extending his hold on power. He thereafter ruled for 14 years until he was ousted. To prop up authoritarian control, the Marcos propaganda machine contrived deceptive images of Philippine society as in the slogans "New Society" and "City of Man," which sought to paint a picture of a "compassionate society"; but Imelda Marcos actually put up whitewashed fences to hide urban blight and squalor from foreign tourists. The Marcoses also portrayed themselves in the likenesses of the legendary personae of Malakas at Maganda in the Filipino origin myth, which made them appear as fount of life in murals and photographic visuals. But the dictatorship actually engendered some of the darkest and direst years of Philippine history. Economic crises characterized the Marcos years, as economists have consistently revealed, the most telling indicator was the extent of poverty. Poverty incidence grew from 41% in the 1960s to 59% in the 1980s. Vaunted growth was far from inclusive and driven by debt, which further weighed down on the nation. From 1970 to 1983, foreign debt increased twelve times and reached $20 billion (Dr. Manuel Montes, 1984). It grew at an average rate of 25% from 1970 to 1981. Much went to unproductive expenses like the Bataan Nuclear Plant, which was unsound and wasteful. The Marcos regime then imposed an International Monetary Fund debt-repayment program that resulted in new taxes, massive lay-offs and a towering inflation that stood at 54% in 1984. While wages nominally rose by 29%, prices increased by 92% and the economy declined by 5.5% in 1984. BusinessWorld Research (2016) reckoned for 1984 the highest misery index (inflation + unemployment rates) between 1966 and 2015. From the mid70s, the situation resulted in the massive outflow of labor overseas. The grinding poverty of the majority showed in a sharp increase in two areas, infant mortality and insurgency. Crime rates increased; rebellion surged. Even as inflation cut away at the allocations for health and education, there was an obvious increase in the military budget. Government also increased its contribution to government corporations held by favored friends. Monopolies were created in the sugar and coconut industries that pampered a select group. Marcos cronies made a lot of money through behest loans, which were repaid by tax money. Meantime the international media documented shopping sprees, not to mention lavish parties, by the Marcoses that gave scandal due to the scale of wanton spending. Marcos thus earned an infamous Guinness entry as a man believed to have stolen the most from a single country. To say then that EDSA interrupted our becoming like Singapore is a big joke, a malicious lie. Marcos had mismanaged the economy; it was in shambles long before the EDSA revolt. From 1970 to 1980, among East Asian and Southeast Asian countries, the Philippines registered the lowest GDP per capita at 3.4% (An Analysis of Economic Crisis, ed. Dr. Emmanuel de Dios, 1984). Peace and order, a spurious claim, actually meant an iron-fisted clampdown on civil liberties. Through presidential decree and executive order backed by the full force of the military apparatus, Marcos padlocked Congress, jailed the opposition, gagged media, emasculated unions, and banned student councils. Thousands were jailed without warrant and due process, not to mention countless killings and disappeared. Yet the national crime rate climbed continuously from 183 in 1976 to 279 (per 100,000) in 1980 (De Dios, ed. 1984 citing Philippine Constabulary data). In 14 long years, repression had also stunted the growth of independent-minded new leaders from the younger generation. Today the Filipino people continue to seek peace and prosperity as the social structuress that gave rise to inequities, debt-dependence, poverty, corruption, human rights violations, rebellion, and criminality have remained after the EDSA revolt. What we ought to do is to expand the spaces for people empowerment and inclusive socio-economic development, uphold selfless public service, seek truth and justice in all corridors of government, render our obligations to Inang Bayan, and make sure that the tyranny of the past will never be written out of history. We need to critically evaluate the past so that we do not blindly look for solutions to problems of underdevelopment from those who prospered under the dictatorship or those who allow the same sources of social inequities and injustice. We enjoy greater freedoms today precisely because we fought the Marcos regime and the purveyors of Marcos values that, once in the past, bled this nation dry. The sad thing indeed that could happen is to fall for the trap of seeking a better society from a mythical "golden" past. In that past, Marcos myth-making served to hide the power grab and greed of a Malakas at Maganda. Today Marcos deception seeks to evade accountability. We reject deception and demand accountability! Department of History College of Social Sciences and Philosophy University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City March 28, 2016 | Facebook». www.facebook.com. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

globo.com

g1.globo.com

«Família Marcos volta ao poder nas Filipinas». G1. Consultado em 12 de maio de 2022

gmanetwork.com

News, By AMITA O. LEGASPI, GMA. «Where was Bongbong Marcos when martial law was declared in 1972?». GMA News Online (em inglês). Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

google.com.br

books.google.com.br

Garcia, Myles (31 de março de 2016). Thirty Years Later . . . Catching Up with the Marcos-Era Crimes (em inglês). [S.l.]: eBookIt.com

inquirer.net

newsinfo.inquirer.net

Gonzales, Cathrine (5 de fevereiro de 2022). «Bongbong Marcos maintains he's a graduate of Oxford». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022
Mercado, Neil Arwin (16 de novembro de 2021). «It's official: Bongbong Marcos, Sara Duterte running in tandem in 2022 elections». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022
Corrales, Nestor (17 de novembro de 2021). «Bongbong Marcos: No legal basis to disqualify me». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022
Mercado, Neil Arwin (14 de março de 2022). «Bongbong Marcos shuns Comelec debates, cites 'preferred mode of communication with people'». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022
Galvez, Daphne (22 de abril de 2022). «Pacquiao keen on attending Comelec debate, if Bongbong Marcos shows up». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022
Galvez, Daphne (25 de maio de 2022). «VP-elect Sara Duterte mum on why family members absent during proclamation». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022
Mercado, Neil Arwin (20 de junho de 2022). «Bongbong Marcos to head agriculture department in concurrent post». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022
«LOOK: Bongbong Marcos hosts Christmas party for online supporters». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). 15 de dezembro de 2016. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

globalnation.inquirer.net

Inquirer, Philippine Daily (29 de outubro de 2012). «Marcoses lose US appeal». INQUIRER.net (em inglês). Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

nikkei.com

asia.nikkei.com

«Marcos officially declared Philippines' next president». Nikkei Asia (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022

npr.org

Press, The Associated (10 de maio de 2022). «The son of late dictator Marcos has won the Philippines' presidential election». NPR (em inglês). Consultado em 12 de maio de 2022

philstar.com

Romero, Paolo. «Pimentel seeks probe on failure to collect Marcos estate tax». Philstar.com. Consultado em 14 de maio de 2022

r7.com

noticias.r7.com

«Filho do ditador Ferdinand Marcos assume a Presidência das Filipinas». R7.com. 30 de junho de 2022. Consultado em 3 de julho de 2022

rappler.com

«Why is it difficult for Bongbong Marcos to apologize?». RAPPLER (em inglês). 14 de abril de 2016. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022
«Bongbong Marcos asked Cambridge Analytica to 'rebrand' family image». RAPPLER (em inglês). 15 de julho de 2020. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022
«Solid North still a rock for Bongbong Marcos, but some students speaking up». RAPPLER (em inglês). 8 de novembro de 2021. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

reuters.com

Allard, Tom (11 de maio de 2022). «Analysis: Marcos as Philippine president a boon for China, awkward for U.S.». Reuters (em inglês). Consultado em 17 de janeiro de 2023
Morales, Neil Jerome (25 de maio de 2022). «Philippines Congress proclaims Marcos as next president». Reuters (em inglês). Consultado em 30 de junho de 2022

scmp.com

«Will Marcos Jnr be the first Philippine president who cannot visit the US?». South China Morning Post (em inglês). 2 de maio de 2022. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022
«Marcos heir loses bid to overturn Philippine VP election loss». South China Morning Post (em inglês). 16 de fevereiro de 2021. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

smh.com.au

«"A dynasty on steroids"». The Sydney Morning Herald (em inglês). 23 de novembro de 2012. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

uol.com.br

noticias.uol.com.br

«Filho do ex-ditador Marcos vence eleição presidencial nas Filipinas». noticias.uol.com.br. Consultado em 12 de maio de 2022

upi.com

«U.S. auditors to examine documents related to Philippines' alleged diverted funds». UPI (em inglês). Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

washingtonpost.com

«How the Philippines' brutal history is being whitewashed for voters». Washington Post (em inglês). 12 de abril de 2022. Consultado em 14 de maio de 2022
Parry, John (26 de março de 1986). «Swiss Freeze Marcos' Bank Accounts, Citing Withdrawal Attempt Monday». Washington Post (em inglês). ISSN 0190-8286. Consultado em 14 de maio de 2022

web.archive.org

«Politicians». web.archive.org. 18 de novembro de 2015. Consultado em 9 de maio de 2022

worldcat.org

Manapat, Ricardo; Bughaw (Firm) (2020). Some are smarter than others: the history of Marcos' crony capitalism. [S.l.: s.n.] OCLC 1226800054
Parry, John (26 de março de 1986). «Swiss Freeze Marcos' Bank Accounts, Citing Withdrawal Attempt Monday». Washington Post (em inglês). ISSN 0190-8286. Consultado em 14 de maio de 2022