Bush v. Gore (Portuguese Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Bush v. Gore" in Portuguese language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Portuguese rank
1st place
1st place
332nd place
526th place
1,697th place
3,625th place
7th place
14th place
2,917th place
low place
3rd place
6th place
34th place
86th place
95th place
346th place
107th place
302nd place
3,811th place
low place
230th place
169th place
low place
low place
569th place
1,198th place
1,478th place
4,210th place
5th place
5th place
378th place
861st place
2,318th place
2,173rd place
low place
low place
3,332nd place
5,251st place
312th place
1,283rd place
9,814th place
low place
low place
low place
55th place
656th place
2,909th place
4,426th place
228th place
292nd place
179th place
198th place
6,093rd place
low place
books.google.com
- Drehle, David Von; Nakashima, Ellen (8 de março de 2001). Deadlock the Inside Story of America's Closest Election. [S.l.]: Washington Post Company. pp. 230–234. ISBN 9781586480806
- Lund, Nelson. "The Unbearable Rightness of Bush v. Gore" in The Longest Night: Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000, page 176 (University of California Press, Arthur Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld, eds. 2002).
- Fried, Charles. "An Unreasonable Reaction to a Reasonable Decision" in Bush V. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy, page 12 (Yale University Press, Bruce Ackerman ed. 2002): "The outrage against the stay by 673 law professors is, to say the least, overwrought. If the decision on the merits was justified, the stay becomes irrelevant. Yes, it did shut down the counting three and a half days earlier, but by hypothesis that counting was being done in an unconstitutional way."
chicagotribune.com
- «Why Roberts did it». Chicago Tribune. 2 de junho de 2012. Cópia arquivada em 3 de junho de 2019
- Glanton, Dahleen (27 de abril de 2013). «O'Connor questions court's decision to take Bush v. Gore». Chicago Tribune. Consultado em 29 de abril de 2013. Arquivado do original em 4 de abril de 2013
cnn.com
archives.cnn.com
- «Scalia and Stevens clash over recount stay in Bush v. Gore». CNN. 11 de dezembro de 2000. Consultado em 27 de abril de 2010. Arquivado do original em 8 de maio de 2009
cornell.edu
law.cornell.edu
- «BUSH v. GORE»
- «BUSH v. GORE»
- «Bush v. Gore». Legal Information Institute. 12 de dezembro de 2000. Consultado em 21 de abril de 2019
- «BUSH v. GORE»
- «BUSH v. GORE concurrence»
straylight.law.cornell.edu
- «Bush v. Gore, US Supreme Court Opinion» Id. 5th paragraph in Part I.
- «Bush v. Gore, US Supreme Court Opinion» (6th paragraph from end of Part II-B).
doi.org
dx.doi.org
- Balkin, Jack M. (2001). «Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics». The Yale Law Journal. 110 (8): 1407–1458. ISSN 0044-0094. JSTOR 797581. doi:10.2307/797581
- Balkin, Jack M. (junho de 2001). «Bush v. Gore and the Boundary Between Law and Politics». Yale Law Journal. 110 (8): 1407–1458. JSTOR 797581. doi:10.2307/797581
electionstudies.org
- «Data Files – NORC Files, Media Group Files». 2000 Florida Ballots Project. American National Election Studies. Consultado em 16 de novembro de 2016. Arquivado do original em 9 de abril de 2017
findlaw.com
caselaw.findlaw.com
- «Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-2431 Gore v. Harris 772 S2d 1243». Findlaw. 8 de dezembro de 2000. Consultado em 24 de novembro de 2020
flcourts.gov
supremecourt.flcourts.gov
- «Opinions». Supreme Court (em inglês). Consultado em 12 de fevereiro de 2024
floridalawreview.com
- Lund, Nelson (2009). «Bush v. Gore at the Dawning of the Age of Obama» (PDF). Florida Law Review. 61: 1001–1010
georgetown.edu
scholarship.law.georgetown.edu
- Cole, David (2006). «The Liberal Legacy of Bush v. Gore». Georgetown University Law Center
gmu.edu
law.gmu.edu
- Lund, Nelson. «A Very Streamlined Introduction to Bush v. Gore» (PDF). George Mason University School of Law. Consultado em 2 de agosto de 2023
hofstra.edu
scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu
- Neumann, Richard K. Jr. (2003). «Conflicts of interest in Bush v. Gore: Did some justices vote illegally?». Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. 16: 375
huffpost.com
- Gershman, Bennet L. (18 de fevereiro de 2016). «Justice Scalia's Faux Originalism». HuffPost. Consultado em 15 de abril de 2020
jstor.org
- Balkin, Jack M. (2001). «Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics». The Yale Law Journal. 110 (8): 1407–1458. ISSN 0044-0094. JSTOR 797581. doi:10.2307/797581
- Balkin, Jack M. (junho de 2001). «Bush v. Gore and the Boundary Between Law and Politics». Yale Law Journal. 110 (8): 1407–1458. JSTOR 797581. doi:10.2307/797581
newspapers.com
- Engelhardt, Joel; McCabe, Scott; Stapleton, Christine (27 de janeiro de 2001). «Disputed Palm Beach ballots held potential gains for Gore». Palm Beach Post. West Palm Beach, Florida, United States. p. 1A
nytimes.com
- Greenhouse, Linda (20 de fevereiro de 2001). «Bush v Gore: a special report». The New York Times. p. A1
- «Bush's Team: The First Choices». The New York Times. 23 de janeiro de 1989. p. A00020
- Fessenden, Ford; Broder, John M. (12 de novembro de 2001). «Examining the Vote: the Overview». The New York Times
- Fessenden, Ford. "Ballots Cast by Blacks and Older Voters Were Tossed in Far Greater Numbers", The New York Times (November 12, 2001).
oyez.org
- Transcript and audio of oral arguments in Bush v. Gore, via Oyez.org. Retrieved 2008-06-05.
- «Bush v. Gore». Oyez Project. Consultado em 22 de janeiro de 2011 "Noting that the Equal Protection clause guarantees individuals that their ballots cannot be devalued by 'later arbitrary and disparate treatment,' the per curiam opinion held that the Florida Supreme Court's scheme for recounting ballots was unconstitutional."
politico.com
- «GOP effort to block 'cured' Pennsylvania ballots gets chilly reception from judge». POLITICO. 4 de novembro de 2020
post-gazette.com
- «Election 2000 Timeline». PG Publishing Co., Inc. 17 de dezembro de 2000. Consultado em 28 de outubro de 2006
scholar.google.com
- Lemons v. Bradbury, 538 F.3d (2008).
- Stewart v. Blackwell, 444 F.3d (2006).
- Bennett v. Mollis, 590 F. Supp. 2d (2008).
- State ex rel. Skaggs v. Brunner, 588 F. Supp. 2d (2008).
- ACLU v. Santillanes, 506 F. Supp. 2d (2007).
slate.com
- Hasen, Richard L. (3 de dezembro de 2010). «The real legacy of Bush v. Gore». Slate
ssrn.com
- Lund, Nelson (26 de abril de 2001). «The Unbearable Rightness of Bush v. Gore». Cardozo Law Review. 23 (4): 1221. SSRN 267874
- Tribe, Laurence H., "The Unbearable Wrongness of Bush v. Gore". George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-33; Harvard Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 72. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=431080
stanford.edu
election2000.law.stanford.edu
- «Bush v. Gore, On Application for Stay» (PDF). Consultado em 29 de julho de 2018. Arquivado do original (PDF) em 14 de novembro de 2016
state.fl.us
leg.state.fl.us
- See Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4). «The 2000 Florida Statutes, Title IX, Chapter 102, Section 141». Arquivado do original em 1 de abril de 2005 (This archived version of the Florida statute is dated July 2, 2001, and is from Archive.org.)
- See Fla. Stat. § 102.166. «The 2000 Florida Statutes, Title IX, Chapter 102, Section 166». Arquivado do original em 1 de abril de 2005 (This archived version of the Florida statute is dated July 2, 2001, and is from Archive.org.)
- See Fla. Stat. § 102.112. «The 2000 Florida Statutes, Title IX, Chapter 102, Section 112». Arquivado do original em 21 de abril de 2001 (This archived version of the Florida statute is dated April 21, 2001, and is from Archive.org.)
supremecourt.gov
- «Search – Supreme Court of the United States». www.supremecourt.gov
theatlantic.com
- «Just How Bad Was Bush v. Gore?». The Atlantic. 29 de novembro de 2010
theweek.com
- «The legacy of Bush v. Gore». The Week. 9 de dezembro de 2010
uchicago.edu
norc.uchicago.edu
- «Florida Ballots Project». National Opinion Research Center. Consultado em 28 de abril de 2010. Cópia arquivada em 17 de dezembro de 2001
ucla.edu
today.ucla.edu
- Spillenger, Clyde. «Supreme court fails to argue recount ruling». UCLA Today. Consultado em 28 de outubro de 2006. Arquivado do original em 1 de dezembro de 2008
ucsb.edu
presidency.ucsb.edu
- Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1220 (November 21, 2000). Late-filing criteria are at note 5. See The American Presidency Project for other documents related to the 2000 election dispute.
- «Leon County Judge Rules on Certification» (PDF). Consultado em 28 de setembro de 2006
- «Text: Florida Recount Results». Consultado em 28 de setembro de 2006
- «Bush v. Gore, Brief for Petitioners» (PDF) "The Equal Protection Clause prohibits government officials from implementing an electoral system that gives the votes of similarly situated voters different effect based on the happenstance of the county or district in which those voters live." Paragraph 2 in Argument, Part III-A.
- «Bush v. Gore, Brief of Respondent» (PDF) "The court below was quite insistent that the counting of ballots must be governed by a single uniform standard: the intent of the voter must control." Paragraph 3 in Argument, Part III-A.
- «Bush v. Gore, Brief of Respondent» (PDF) "[T]he appropriate remedy for either an Equal Protection Clause or Due Process Clause violation would not be to cancel all recounts, but rather to order that the recounts be undertaken under a uniform standard." Footnote 28.
- «Bush v. Gore, Brief for Petitioners» (PDF) "By rewriting that statutory scheme—thus arrogating to itself the power to decide the manner in which Florida's electors are chosen—the Florida Supreme Court substituted its judgment for that of the legislature in violation of Article II. Such a usurpation of constitutionally delegated power defies the Framers' plan." Paragraph 2 in Argument, Part I.
- «Bush v. Gore, Brief of Respondent» (PDF) "Even apart from the absurd theory that McPherson requires everything relevant to a state's process for choosing electors to be packed into a specialized presidential electoral code, the very premise of petitioner's argument is fatally flawed because the Florida Legislature re-enacted the contest statute in 1999 against the settled background rule that decisions of circuit courts in contest actions are subject to appellate review." Paragraph 5 in Argument, Part I.
umd.edu
bsos.umd.edu
- Fliter, John. «Review of The Rehnquist Court: Judicial Activism on the Right». Arquivado do original em 16 de abril de 2006
umn.edu
conservancy.umn.edu
- Tribe, Laurence H. (2002). «Lost at the Equal Protection Carnival: Nelson Lund's Carnival of Mirrors» (PDF). Constitutional Commentary. 19. 619 páginas
vanderbilt.edu
scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu
- Michael Abramowicz and, Maxwell L. Stearns (outubro de 2001). «Beyond Counting Votes: The Political Economy of Bush v. Gore». Vanderbilt Law Review. Consultado em 2 de agosto de 2023
vanityfair.com
- Margolick, David (outubro de 2004). «The Path to Florida». Vanity Fair. Condé Nast
washingtonmonthly.com
- Raskin, Jamin (março de 2001). «Bandits in Black Robes». Washington Monthly. Consultado em 28 de outubro de 2006. Arquivado do original em 19 de outubro de 2006
washingtonpost.com
- Von, David (3 de fevereiro de 2001). «Anxious Moments In the Final Stretch». The Washington Post. Consultado em 21 de abril de 2017
- Keating, Dan; Balz, Dan (12 de dezembro de 2001). «Florida Recounts Would Have Favored Bush». The Washington Post
web.archive.org
- «Florida Ballots Project». National Opinion Research Center. Consultado em 28 de abril de 2010. Cópia arquivada em 17 de dezembro de 2001
- «Data Files – NORC Files, Media Group Files». 2000 Florida Ballots Project. American National Election Studies. Consultado em 16 de novembro de 2016. Arquivado do original em 9 de abril de 2017
- Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1220 (November 21, 2000). Late-filing criteria are at note 5. See The American Presidency Project for other documents related to the 2000 election dispute.
- See Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4). «The 2000 Florida Statutes, Title IX, Chapter 102, Section 141». Arquivado do original em 1 de abril de 2005 (This archived version of the Florida statute is dated July 2, 2001, and is from Archive.org.)
- See Fla. Stat. § 102.166. «The 2000 Florida Statutes, Title IX, Chapter 102, Section 166». Arquivado do original em 1 de abril de 2005 (This archived version of the Florida statute is dated July 2, 2001, and is from Archive.org.)
- See Fla. Stat. § 102.112. «The 2000 Florida Statutes, Title IX, Chapter 102, Section 112». Arquivado do original em 21 de abril de 2001 (This archived version of the Florida statute is dated April 21, 2001, and is from Archive.org.)
- «Scalia and Stevens clash over recount stay in Bush v. Gore». CNN. 11 de dezembro de 2000. Consultado em 27 de abril de 2010. Arquivado do original em 8 de maio de 2009
- Weinberg, Louise. Arquivado em setembro 17, 2004, no Wayback Machine in When Courts Decide Elections: The Constitutionality of Bush v. Gore, 82 Boston University Law Review 609 (2002), p. 33.
In Bush v. Gore, on the contrary, the Court actively prevented the completion of a halted state recount, never having ruled on the merits either of the challenge or the election and never having adjudicated the validity of Bush's certification or Gore's request for a recount. Instead, the Court selected the next President of the United States in the absence of a completed election—the ultimate political act. A meaningful remand in Bush v. Gore, or completing the election under the Court's own supervision, would have preserved the Constitution from this assault.
- Fliter, John. «Review of The Rehnquist Court: Judicial Activism on the Right». Arquivado do original em 16 de abril de 2006
- Lund, Nelson. «The Unbearable Rightness of Bush v. Gore» (PDF). Arquivado do original (PDF) em 17 de outubro de 2005
- Spillenger, Clyde. «Supreme court fails to argue recount ruling». UCLA Today. Consultado em 28 de outubro de 2006. Arquivado do original em 1 de dezembro de 2008
- «Why Roberts did it». Chicago Tribune. 2 de junho de 2012. Cópia arquivada em 3 de junho de 2019
- «Bush v. Gore, On Application for Stay» (PDF). Consultado em 29 de julho de 2018. Arquivado do original (PDF) em 14 de novembro de 2016
- Raskin, Jamin (março de 2001). «Bandits in Black Robes». Washington Monthly. Consultado em 28 de outubro de 2006. Arquivado do original em 19 de outubro de 2006
- Glanton, Dahleen (27 de abril de 2013). «O'Connor questions court's decision to take Bush v. Gore». Chicago Tribune. Consultado em 29 de abril de 2013. Arquivado do original em 4 de abril de 2013
worldcat.org
- Balkin, Jack M. (2001). «Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics». The Yale Law Journal. 110 (8): 1407–1458. ISSN 0044-0094. JSTOR 797581. doi:10.2307/797581
yale.edu
digitalcommons.law.yale.edu
- Balkin, Jack M. (2001). «Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics». The Yale Law Journal. 110 (8): 1407–1458. ISSN 0044-0094. JSTOR 797581. doi:10.2307/797581
yu.edu
cardozo.yu.edu
- Lund, Nelson. «The Unbearable Rightness of Bush v. Gore» (PDF). Arquivado do original (PDF) em 17 de outubro de 2005