Falácia informal (Portuguese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Falácia informal" in Portuguese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Portuguese rank
1,865th place
892nd place
2nd place
4th place
179th place
198th place
462nd place
521st place
3rd place
6th place
1,379th place
775th place
low place
8,234th place
1,425th place
2,869th place
1,523rd place
3,490th place
5th place
5th place
710th place
502nd place
1st place
1st place
79th place
212th place
305th place
293rd place
92nd place
225th place
269th place
490th place
low place
9,511th place

books.google.com

cambridge.org

dictionary.cambridge.org

degruyter.com

  • Woods, John; Walton, Douglas (1989). «Chapter 17. What is Informal Logic?». Fallacies (em inglês). [S.l.]: De Gruyter Mouton. ISBN 978-3-11-081608-2 

doi.org

dx.doi.org

encyclopedia.com

  • Stump, David J. «Fallacy, Logical». www.encyclopedia.com. Consultado em 20 de março de 2021 
  • Mackie, J. L. (1967). «Fallacies». www.encyclopedia.com. Consultado em 19 de março de 2021 

escholarship.org

fallacyfiles.org

meiner.de

newsweek.com

  • Trudolyubov, Maxim (15 de janeiro de 2017), «How Putin succeeded in undermining our institutions», Newsweek, consultado em 3 de julho de 2017, The way the Kremlin has always reacted to reports about corruption or arbitrary police rule, or the state of Russia's penal institutions, is by generating similar reports about the West. Whatever the other party says the answer is always the same: 'Look who's talking.' This age-old technique, dubbed 'whataboutism', is in essence an appeal to hypocrisy; its only purpose is to discredit the opponent, not to refute the original argument. 

npr.org

oxforddictionaries.com

en.oxforddictionaries.com

philpapers.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Hansen, Hans (2020). «Fallacies». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Consultado em 18 de março de 2021 
  • Groarke, Leo (2020). «Informal Logic: 4. Assessing Arguments». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Consultado em 20 de março de 2021 
  • Bartha, Paul (2019). «Analogy and Analogical Reasoning». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Consultado em 21 de janeiro de 2021 

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

  • Dowden, Bradley. «Fallacies». Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Consultado em 19 de março de 2021 

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

wsj.com

  • Zimmer, Ben (9 de junho de 2017). «The Roots of the 'What About?' Ploy». The Wall Street Journal. Consultado em 22 de julho de 2017. "Whataboutism" is another name for the logical fallacy of "tu quoque" (Latin for "you also"), in which an accusation is met with a counter-accusation, pivoting away from the original criticism. The strategy has been a hallmark of Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda, and some commentators have accused President Donald Trump of mimicking Mr. Putin's use of the technique.