Gnose (Portuguese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Gnose" in Portuguese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Portuguese rank

5tufts.edu

155^th place

163^rd place

4books.google.com

3^rd place

6^th place

2loc.gov

70^th place

170^th place

2doi.org

2^nd place

4^th place

2jstor.org

26^th place

65^th place

1britannica.com

40^th place

17^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

1psyche.gr

low place

books.google.com

Kurt Rudolph (2001). Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism. [S.l.]: A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-567-08640-2
Brakke, David (2010). The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 18–51. ISBN 9780674066038. JSTOR j.ctvjnrvhh.6
Andrew Phillip Smith (2009). A Dictionary of Gnosticism. [S.l.]: Quest Books. ISBN 978-0-8356-0869-5
Green, Michael. 2 Peter & Jude. [S.l.]: Eerdman's

britannica.com

Williams, Michael (20 de julho de 1998). «Gnosticism». Encyclopædia Britannica. Edinburgh: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Arquivado do original em 4 de janeiro de 2021

doi.org

dx.doi.org

Porter, Stanley E. (2016). «What Do We Mean by Speaking of Paul and Gnosis/Knowledge? A Semantic and Frequency Investigation». In: Porter; Yoon. Paul and Gnosis. Col: Pauline Studies. 9. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 7–22. ISBN 978-90-04-31668-3. LCCN 2016009435. doi:10.1163/9789004316690_003
May, Gerhard (2008). «Part V: The Shaping of Christian Theology - Monotheism and creation». In: Mitchell, Margaret M. Mitchell; Young. The Cambridge History of Christianity, Volume 1: Origins to Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 434–451, 452–456. ISBN 9781139054836. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521812399.026

jstor.org

Brakke, David (2010). The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 18–51. ISBN 9780674066038. JSTOR j.ctvjnrvhh.6
Kvam; Schearing; Ziegler, eds. (1999). «Early Christian Interpretations (50–450 CE)». Eve and Adam: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Readings on Genesis and Gender. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. pp. 108–155. ISBN 9780253212719. JSTOR j.ctt2050vqm.8

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

Porter, Stanley E. (2016). «What Do We Mean by Speaking of Paul and Gnosis/Knowledge? A Semantic and Frequency Investigation». In: Porter; Yoon. Paul and Gnosis. Col: Pauline Studies. 9. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 7–22. ISBN 978-90-04-31668-3. LCCN 2016009435. doi:10.1163/9789004316690_003
Ehrman, Bart D. (2005) [2003]. «Christians "In The Know": The Worlds of Early Christian Gnosticism». Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 113–134. ISBN 978-0-19-518249-1. LCCN 2003053097

psyche.gr

Faith And Science In Orthodox Gnosiology And Methodology por George Metallinos "O cientista e professor do conhecimento do Incriado, na Tradição Ortodoxa, é o Geron Starets (o Ancião ou Pai Espiritual), o guia ou “mestre do deserto”. O registro de ambos os tipos de conhecimento pressupõe o conhecimento empírico do fenômeno. O mesmo vale para o campo da ciência, onde apenas o especialista entende as pesquisas de outros cientistas da mesma área. A adoção de conclusões ou achados de um ramo científico por não especialistas (ou seja, aqueles que são incapazes de examinar experimentalmente as pesquisas dos especialistas) é baseada na confiança da credibilidade dos especialistas. Caso contrário, não haveria progresso científico. O mesmo se aplica à ciência da fé. O conhecimento empírico dos Santos, Profetas, Apóstolos, Pais e Mães de todas as idades é adotado e fundamentado na mesma confiança. A tradição patrística e os Concílios da Igreja funcionam sobre esta experiência comprovada. Não há Concílio Ecumênico sem a presença dos glorificados/deificados (theoumenoi), aqueles que vêem o divino (este é o problema dos concílios de hoje!). A doutrina ortodoxa resulta dessa relação." University of Athens - Department of Theology

tufts.edu

perseus.tufts.edu

Liddell Scott entry γνῶσις, εως, ἡ, A. seeking to know, inquiry, investigation, esp. judicial, "τὰς τῶν δικαστηρίων γ." D.18.224; "τὴν κατὰ τοῦ διαιτητοῦ γdeetr." Id.21.92, cf. 7.9, Lycurg.141; "γ. περὶ τῆς δίκης" PHib.1.92.13 (iii B. C.). 2. result of investigation, decision, PPetr.3p.118 (iii B. C.). II. knowing, knowledge, Heraclit.56; opp. ἀγνωσίη, Hp. Vict.1.23 (dub.); opp. ἄγνοια, Pl.R.478c; "ἡ αἴσθησις γ. τις" Arist.GA731a33: pl., "Θεὸς γνώσεων κύριος" LXX 1 Ki.2.3. b. higher, esoteric knowledge, 1 Ep.Cor.8.7,10, Ep.Eph.3.19, etc.; "χαρισάμενος ἡμῖν νοῦν, λόγον, γνῶσιν" PMag.Par.2.290. 2. acquaintance with a person, "πρός τινα" Test. ap.Aeschin.1.50; "τῶν Σεβαστῶν" IPE1.47.6 (Olbia). 3. recognizing, Th.7.44. 4. means of knowing, "αἱ αἰσθήσεις] κυριώταται τῶν καθ᾽ ἕκαστα γ." Arist.Metaph.981b11. III. being known, "γνῶσιν ἔχει τι", = "γνωστόν ἐστι", Pl.Tht.206b. 2. fame, credit, Hdn.7.5.5, Luc.Herod.3. IV. means of knowing: hence, statement in writing, PLond.5.1708, etc. (vi A. D.). V. = γνῶμα, Hsch. s. h. v.
LSJ entry γνωστ-ικός, ή, όν, A. of or for knowing, cognitive: ἡ -κή (sc. ἐπιστήμη), theoretical science (opp. πρακτική), Pl.Plt.258b.c., etc.; τὸ γ. ib.261b; "ἕξεις γ." Arist.AP0.100a11 (Comp.); "γ. εἰκόνες" Hierocl.in CA25p.475M.: c. gen., able to discern, Ocell. 2.7. Adv. "-κῶς" Procl.Inst.39, Dam.Pr.79, Phlp.in Ph.241.22.
In Perseus databank 10x Plato, Cratylus, Theaetetus, Sophist, Statesman 2x Plutarch, Compendium libri de animae procreatione + De animae procreatione in Timaeo, 2x Pseudo-Plutarch, De musica
Plato. Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 12 translated by Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1921.
feminine nominative adjective

worldcat.org

Buckley, Jorunn Jacobsen (2002). The Mandaeans: ancient texts and modern people. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515385-5. OCLC 65198443