Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Jacamim-de-costas-escuras" in Portuguese language version.
Traditionally, three ‘biological’ species of Psophia have been widely recognized. Our genetic and museum-based analyses, however, confirm that two of these are not monophyletic and the third includes several distinct taxa. Our data instead identify eight diagnosably distinct phylogenetic species, each endemic in a major area of endemism.
Traditionally, three ‘biological’ species of Psophia have been widely recognized. Our genetic and museum-based analyses, however, confirm that two of these are not monophyletic and the third includes several distinct taxa. Our data instead identify eight diagnosably distinct phylogenetic species, each endemic in a major area of endemism.
Traditionally, three ‘biological’ species of Psophia have been widely recognized. Our genetic and museum-based analyses, however, confirm that two of these are not monophyletic and the third includes several distinct taxa. Our data instead identify eight diagnosably distinct phylogenetic species, each endemic in a major area of endemism.
Traditionally, three ‘biological’ species of Psophia have been widely recognized. Our genetic and museum-based analyses, however, confirm that two of these are not monophyletic and the third includes several distinct taxa. Our data instead identify eight diagnosably distinct phylogenetic species, each endemic in a major area of endemism.
